1,242 research outputs found
Exploiting citation networks for large-scale author name disambiguation
We present a novel algorithm and validation method for disambiguating author
names in very large bibliographic data sets and apply it to the full Web of
Science (WoS) citation index. Our algorithm relies only upon the author and
citation graphs available for the whole period covered by the WoS. A pair-wise
publication similarity metric, which is based on common co-authors,
self-citations, shared references and citations, is established to perform a
two-step agglomerative clustering that first connects individual papers and
then merges similar clusters. This parameterized model is optimized using an
h-index based recall measure, favoring the correct assignment of well-cited
publications, and a name-initials-based precision using WoS metadata and
cross-referenced Google Scholar profiles. Despite the use of limited metadata,
we reach a recall of 87% and a precision of 88% with a preference for
researchers with high h-index values. 47 million articles of WoS can be
disambiguated on a single machine in less than a day. We develop an h-index
distribution model, confirming that the prediction is in excellent agreement
with the empirical data, and yielding insight into the utility of the h-index
in real academic ranking scenarios.Comment: 14 pages, 5 figure
Effective Unsupervised Author Disambiguation with Relative Frequencies
This work addresses the problem of author name homonymy in the Web of
Science. Aiming for an efficient, simple and straightforward solution, we
introduce a novel probabilistic similarity measure for author name
disambiguation based on feature overlap. Using the researcher-ID available for
a subset of the Web of Science, we evaluate the application of this measure in
the context of agglomeratively clustering author mentions. We focus on a
concise evaluation that shows clearly for which problem setups and at which
time during the clustering process our approach works best. In contrast to most
other works in this field, we are sceptical towards the performance of author
name disambiguation methods in general and compare our approach to the trivial
single-cluster baseline. Our results are presented separately for each correct
clustering size as we can explain that, when treating all cases together, the
trivial baseline and more sophisticated approaches are hardly distinguishable
in terms of evaluation results. Our model shows state-of-the-art performance
for all correct clustering sizes without any discriminative training and with
tuning only one convergence parameter.Comment: Proceedings of JCDL 201
- …