11 research outputs found

    A PRG for Lipschitz Functions of Polynomials with Applications to Sparsest Cut

    Full text link
    We give improved pseudorandom generators (PRGs) for Lipschitz functions of low-degree polynomials over the hypercube. These are functions of the form psi(P(x)), where P is a low-degree polynomial and psi is a function with small Lipschitz constant. PRGs for smooth functions of low-degree polynomials have received a lot of attention recently and play an important role in constructing PRGs for the natural class of polynomial threshold functions. In spite of the recent progress, no nontrivial PRGs were known for fooling Lipschitz functions of degree O(log n) polynomials even for constant error rate. In this work, we give the first such generator obtaining a seed-length of (log n)\tilde{O}(d^2/eps^2) for fooling degree d polynomials with error eps. Previous generators had an exponential dependence on the degree. We use our PRG to get better integrality gap instances for sparsest cut, a fundamental problem in graph theory with many applications in graph optimization. We give an instance of uniform sparsest cut for which a powerful semi-definite relaxation (SDP) first introduced by Goemans and Linial and studied in the seminal work of Arora, Rao and Vazirani has an integrality gap of exp(\Omega((log log n)^{1/2})). Understanding the performance of the Goemans-Linial SDP for uniform sparsest cut is an important open problem in approximation algorithms and metric embeddings and our work gives a near-exponential improvement over previous lower bounds which achieved a gap of \Omega(log log n)

    Deterministic search for CNF satisfying assignments in almost polynomial time

    Full text link
    We consider the fundamental derandomization problem of deterministically finding a satisfying assignment to a CNF formula that has many satisfying assignments. We give a deterministic algorithm which, given an nn-variable poly(n)\mathrm{poly}(n)-clause CNF formula FF that has at least ε2n\varepsilon 2^n satisfying assignments, runs in time nO~(loglogn)2 n^{\tilde{O}(\log\log n)^2} for ε1/polylog(n)\varepsilon \ge 1/\mathrm{polylog}(n) and outputs a satisfying assignment of FF. Prior to our work the fastest known algorithm for this problem was simply to enumerate over all seeds of a pseudorandom generator for CNFs; using the best known PRGs for CNFs [DETT10], this takes time nΩ~(logn)n^{\tilde{\Omega}(\log n)} even for constant ε\varepsilon. Our approach is based on a new general framework relating deterministic search and deterministic approximate counting, which we believe may find further applications

    Pseudorandomness via the discrete Fourier transform

    Full text link
    We present a new approach to constructing unconditional pseudorandom generators against classes of functions that involve computing a linear function of the inputs. We give an explicit construction of a pseudorandom generator that fools the discrete Fourier transforms of linear functions with seed-length that is nearly logarithmic (up to polyloglog factors) in the input size and the desired error parameter. Our result gives a single pseudorandom generator that fools several important classes of tests computable in logspace that have been considered in the literature, including halfspaces (over general domains), modular tests and combinatorial shapes. For all these classes, our generator is the first that achieves near logarithmic seed-length in both the input length and the error parameter. Getting such a seed-length is a natural challenge in its own right, which needs to be overcome in order to derandomize RL - a central question in complexity theory. Our construction combines ideas from a large body of prior work, ranging from a classical construction of [NN93] to the recent gradually increasing independence paradigm of [KMN11, CRSW13, GMRTV12], while also introducing some novel analytic machinery which might find other applications

    Quantified Derandomization of Linear Threshold Circuits

    Full text link
    One of the prominent current challenges in complexity theory is the attempt to prove lower bounds for TC0TC^0, the class of constant-depth, polynomial-size circuits with majority gates. Relying on the results of Williams (2013), an appealing approach to prove such lower bounds is to construct a non-trivial derandomization algorithm for TC0TC^0. In this work we take a first step towards the latter goal, by proving the first positive results regarding the derandomization of TC0TC^0 circuits of depth d>2d>2. Our first main result is a quantified derandomization algorithm for TC0TC^0 circuits with a super-linear number of wires. Specifically, we construct an algorithm that gets as input a TC0TC^0 circuit CC over nn input bits with depth dd and n1+exp(d)n^{1+\exp(-d)} wires, runs in almost-polynomial-time, and distinguishes between the case that CC rejects at most 2n11/5d2^{n^{1-1/5d}} inputs and the case that CC accepts at most 2n11/5d2^{n^{1-1/5d}} inputs. In fact, our algorithm works even when the circuit CC is a linear threshold circuit, rather than just a TC0TC^0 circuit (i.e., CC is a circuit with linear threshold gates, which are stronger than majority gates). Our second main result is that even a modest improvement of our quantified derandomization algorithm would yield a non-trivial algorithm for standard derandomization of all of TC0TC^0, and would consequently imply that NEXP⊈TC0NEXP\not\subseteq TC^0. Specifically, if there exists a quantified derandomization algorithm that gets as input a TC0TC^0 circuit with depth dd and n1+O(1/d)n^{1+O(1/d)} wires (rather than n1+exp(d)n^{1+\exp(-d)} wires), runs in time at most 2nexp(d)2^{n^{\exp(-d)}}, and distinguishes between the case that CC rejects at most 2n11/5d2^{n^{1-1/5d}} inputs and the case that CC accepts at most 2n11/5d2^{n^{1-1/5d}} inputs, then there exists an algorithm with running time 2n1Ω(1)2^{n^{1-\Omega(1)}} for standard derandomization of TC0TC^0.Comment: Changes in this revision: An additional result (a PRG for quantified derandomization of depth-2 LTF circuits); rewrite of some of the exposition; minor correction

    Hardness Results for Agnostically Learning Low-Degree Polynomial Threshold Functions

    Full text link
    corecore