Cut-Matching Games on Directed Graphs

We give O(log^2 n)-approximation algorithm based on the cut-matching framework of [10, 13, 14] for computing the sparsest cut on directed graphs. Our algorithm uses only O(log^2 n) single commodity max-flow computations and thus breaks the multicommodity-flow barrier for computing the sparsest cut on directed graph

Gap Amplification for Small-Set Expansion via Random Walks

In this work, we achieve gap amplification for the Small-Set Expansion problem. Specifically, we show that an instance of the Small-Set Expansion Problem with completeness $\epsilon$ and soundness $\frac{1}{2}$ is at least as difficult as Small-Set Expansion with completeness $\epsilon$ and soundness $f(\epsilon)$, for any function $f(\epsilon)$ which grows faster than $\sqrt{\epsilon}$. We achieve this amplification via random walks -- our gadget is the graph with adjacency matrix corresponding to a random walk on the original graph. An interesting feature of our reduction is that unlike gap amplification via parallel repetition, the size of the instances (number of vertices) produced by the reduction remains the same

Many Sparse Cuts via Higher Eigenvalues

Cheeger's fundamental inequality states that any edge-weighted graph has a vertex subset $S$ such that its expansion (a.k.a. conductance) is bounded as follows: \phi(S) \defeq \frac{w(S,\bar{S})}{\min \set{w(S), w(\bar{S})}} \leq 2\sqrt{\lambda_2} where $w$ is the total edge weight of a subset or a cut and $\lambda_2$ is the second smallest eigenvalue of the normalized Laplacian of the graph. Here we prove the following natural generalization: for any integer $k \in [n]$, there exist $ck$ disjoint subsets $S_1, ..., S_{ck}$, such that $$\max_i \phi(S_i) \leq C \sqrt{\lambda_{k} \log k}$$ where $\lambda_i$ is the $i^{th}$ smallest eigenvalue of the normalized Laplacian and $c0$ are suitable absolute constants. Our proof is via a polynomial-time algorithm to find such subsets, consisting of a spectral projection and a randomized rounding. As a consequence, we get the same upper bound for the small set expansion problem, namely for any $k$, there is a subset $S$ whose weight is at most a \bigO(1/k) fraction of the total weight and $\phi(S) \le C \sqrt{\lambda_k \log k}$. Both results are the best possible up to constant factors. The underlying algorithmic problem, namely finding $k$ subsets such that the maximum expansion is minimized, besides extending sparse cuts to more than one subset, appears to be a natural clustering problem in its own right

Partitioning into Expanders

Let G=(V,E) be an undirected graph, lambda_k be the k-th smallest eigenvalue of the normalized laplacian matrix of G. There is a basic fact in algebraic graph theory that lambda_k > 0 if and only if G has at most k-1 connected components. We prove a robust version of this fact. If lambda_k>0, then for some 1\leq \ell\leq k-1, V can be {\em partitioned} into l sets P_1,\ldots,P_l such that each P_i is a low-conductance set in G and induces a high conductance induced subgraph. In particular, \phi(P_i)=O(l^3\sqrt{\lambda_l}) and \phi(G[P_i]) >= \lambda_k/k^2). We make our results algorithmic by designing a simple polynomial time spectral algorithm to find such partitioning of G with a quadratic loss in the inside conductance of P_i's. Unlike the recent results on higher order Cheeger's inequality [LOT12,LRTV12], our algorithmic results do not use higher order eigenfunctions of G. If there is a sufficiently large gap between lambda_k and lambda_{k+1}, more precisely, if \lambda_{k+1} >= \poly(k) lambda_{k}^{1/4} then our algorithm finds a k partitioning of V into sets P_1,...,P_k such that the induced subgraph G[P_i] has a significantly larger conductance than the conductance of P_i in G. Such a partitioning may represent the best k clustering of G. Our algorithm is a simple local search that only uses the Spectral Partitioning algorithm as a subroutine. We expect to see further applications of this simple algorithm in clustering applications

Approximating Non-Uniform Sparsest Cut via Generalized Spectra

We give an approximation algorithm for non-uniform sparsest cut with the following guarantee: For any $\epsilon,\delta \in (0,1)$, given cost and demand graphs with edge weights $C, D$ respectively, we can find a set $T\subseteq V$ with $\frac{C(T,V\setminus T)}{D(T,V\setminus T)}$ at most $\frac{1+\epsilon}{\delta}$ times the optimal non-uniform sparsest cut value, in time 2^{r/(\delta\epsilon)}\poly(n) provided $\lambda_r \ge \Phi^*/(1-\delta)$. Here $\lambda_r$ is the $r$'th smallest generalized eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrices of cost and demand graphs; $C(T,V\setminus T)$ (resp. $D(T,V\setminus T)$) is the weight of edges crossing the $(T,V\setminus T)$ cut in cost (resp. demand) graph and $\Phi^*$ is the sparsity of the optimal cut. In words, we show that the non-uniform sparsest cut problem is easy when the generalized spectrum grows moderately fast. To the best of our knowledge, there were no results based on higher order spectra for non-uniform sparsest cut prior to this work. Even for uniform sparsest cut, the quantitative aspects of our result are somewhat stronger than previous methods. Similar results hold for other expansion measures like edge expansion, normalized cut, and conductance, with the $r$'th smallest eigenvalue of the normalized Laplacian playing the role of $\lambda_r$ in the latter two cases. Our proof is based on an l1-embedding of vectors from a semi-definite program from the Lasserre hierarchy. The embedded vectors are then rounded to a cut using standard threshold rounding. We hope that the ideas connecting $\ell_1$-embeddings to Lasserre SDPs will find other applications. Another aspect of the analysis is the adaptation of the column selection paradigm from our earlier work on rounding Lasserre SDPs [GS11] to pick a set of edges rather than vertices. This feature is important in order to extend the algorithms to non-uniform sparsest cut.Comment: 16 page