455 research outputs found
On Linear Congestion Games with Altruistic Social Context
We study the issues of existence and inefficiency of pure Nash equilibria in
linear congestion games with altruistic social context, in the spirit of the
model recently proposed by de Keijzer {\em et al.} \cite{DSAB13}. In such a
framework, given a real matrix specifying a particular
social context, each player aims at optimizing a linear combination of the
payoffs of all the players in the game, where, for each player , the
multiplicative coefficient is given by the value . We give a broad
characterization of the social contexts for which pure Nash equilibria are
always guaranteed to exist and provide tight or almost tight bounds on their
prices of anarchy and stability. In some of the considered cases, our
achievements either improve or extend results previously known in the
literature
On Existence and Properties of Approximate Pure Nash Equilibria in Bandwidth Allocation Games
In \emph{bandwidth allocation games} (BAGs), the strategy of a player
consists of various demands on different resources. The player's utility is at
most the sum of these demands, provided they are fully satisfied. Every
resource has a limited capacity and if it is exceeded by the total demand, it
has to be split between the players. Since these games generally do not have
pure Nash equilibria, we consider approximate pure Nash equilibria, in which no
player can improve her utility by more than some fixed factor through
unilateral strategy changes. There is a threshold (where
is a parameter that limits the demand of each player on a specific
resource) such that -approximate pure Nash equilibria always exist for
, but not for . We give both
upper and lower bounds on this threshold and show that the
corresponding decision problem is -hard. We also show that the
-approximate price of anarchy for BAGs is . For a restricted
version of the game, where demands of players only differ slightly from each
other (e.g. symmetric games), we show that approximate Nash equilibria can be
reached (and thus also be computed) in polynomial time using the best-response
dynamic. Finally, we show that a broader class of utility-maximization games
(which includes BAGs) converges quickly towards states whose social welfare is
close to the optimum
Efficient computation of approximate pure Nash equilibria in congestion games
Congestion games constitute an important class of games in which computing an
exact or even approximate pure Nash equilibrium is in general {\sf
PLS}-complete. We present a surprisingly simple polynomial-time algorithm that
computes O(1)-approximate Nash equilibria in these games. In particular, for
congestion games with linear latency functions, our algorithm computes
-approximate pure Nash equilibria in time polynomial in the
number of players, the number of resources and . It also applies to
games with polynomial latency functions with constant maximum degree ;
there, the approximation guarantee is . The algorithm essentially
identifies a polynomially long sequence of best-response moves that lead to an
approximate equilibrium; the existence of such short sequences is interesting
in itself. These are the first positive algorithmic results for approximate
equilibria in non-symmetric congestion games. We strengthen them further by
proving that, for congestion games that deviate from our mild assumptions,
computing -approximate equilibria is {\sf PLS}-complete for any
polynomial-time computable
On the Impact of Fair Best Response Dynamics
In this work we completely characterize how the frequency with which each
player participates in the game dynamics affects the possibility of reaching
efficient states, i.e., states with an approximation ratio within a constant
factor from the price of anarchy, within a polynomially bounded number of best
responses. We focus on the well known class of congestion games and we show
that, if each player is allowed to play at least once and at most times
any best responses, states with approximation ratio times the
price of anarchy are reached after best
responses, and that such a bound is essentially tight also after exponentially
many ones. One important consequence of our result is that the fairness among
players is a necessary and sufficient condition for guaranteeing a fast
convergence to efficient states. This answers the important question of the
maximum order of needed to fast obtain efficient states, left open by
[9,10] and [3], in which fast convergence for constant and very slow
convergence for have been shown, respectively. Finally, we show
that the structure of the game implicitly affects its performances. In
particular, we show that in the symmetric setting, in which all players share
the same set of strategies, the game always converges to an efficient state
after a polynomial number of best responses, regardless of the frequency each
player moves with
- …