1,330 research outputs found

    The Dynamics of Food Web Model with Defensive Switching Property

    Get PDF
    In this paper, a food web model consisting of two-predator one-prey with the defensive switching of predation avoidance is proposed and analyzed. It is assumed that the prey growth logistically in the absence of predators and defends itself from relatively abundant predator species by switching to another habitat with relatively rare predator species. Sufficient conditions for the stability of the non-trivial equilibrium point are obtained. The Lyapunov function is constructed to establish the global asymptotic stability of the non-trivial equilibrium point when the intensity of defensive switching equal one. Numerical simulations for different sets of parameter values and for different sets of initial conditions are carried out. It has been shown that the system has a globally asymptotically stable non-trivial point when the two predators have the same mortality rates

    Why Punish: Social Reciprocity and the Enforcement of Prosocial Norms

    Get PDF
    Recently economists have become interested in why people who face social dilemmas in the experimental lab use the seemingly incredible threat of punishment to deter free riding. Three theories with evolvutionary microfoundations have been developed to explain punishment. We survey these theories and use behavioral data from surveys and experiments to show that the theory called social reciprocity in which people punish norm violators indiscriminately explains punishment best.social dilemma, punishment, norm, evolutionary game theory, experiment

    Defended fortresses or moving targets? Another model of inducible defenses inspired by military metaphors

    Get PDF
    Journal ArticleWe use a common framework to compare three models of plant strategies to confront herbivory: constitutive defense, optimal inducible defense, and the "moving target." Plants with constitutive defenses retain a fixed defensive phenotype. Plants with optimal inducible defenses respond to attack by increasing defenses. Plants following the moving target strategy respond to attack by altering phenotype

    Foraging for foundations in decision neuroscience: insights from ethology

    Get PDF
    Modern decision neuroscience offers a powerful and broad account of human behaviour using computational techniques that link psychological and neuroscientific approaches to the ways that individuals can generate near-optimal choices in complex controlled environments. However, until recently, relatively little attention has been paid to the extent to which the structure of experimental environments relates to natural scenarios, and the survival problems that individuals have evolved to solve. This situation not only risks leaving decision-theoretic accounts ungrounded but also makes various aspects of the solutions, such as hard-wired or Pavlovian policies, difficult to interpret in the natural world. Here, we suggest importing concepts, paradigms and approaches from the fields of ethology and behavioural ecology, which concentrate on the contextual and functional correlates of decisions made about foraging and escape and address these lacunae

    ๊ณค์ถฉ์˜ ์„ญ์‹ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ˜ํฌ์‹ ํ–‰๋™์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ์œ ์—ฐ์ „๋žต๊ณผ ๊ณ ์ •์ „๋žต

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์ž์—ฐ๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ƒ๋ช…๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ํ”ผ์˜คํŠธ๋ฅด ์•ผ๋ธŒ์›์Šคํ‚ค.This dissertation presents my theoretical and empirical studies of flexibility focused on two topics of insect ethology. The first topic is the collective foraging strategy of the ants. Army ants were chosen as an example of extremely low behavioral flexibility in foraging; and on the other hand, carpenter ants were used to study mechanisms of extraordinarily high flexibility. My second interest is the behavioral control of aposematism, the phenomenon in which a defended prey animal gives a warning signal to predators who may recognize its advertised unprofitability. In my first study, I investigated theoretical benefits potentially associated with the evolution of specialized foraging behavior performed by army ants. It is known that a typical colony of Neotropical army ants (subfamily Ecitoninae) regularly raids a large area around their bivouac by forming a narrow directional column that can reach up to one hundred meters in length. Then the raid is finished and then relaunched 12โ€“17 times, each time toward different orientations before the colony relocates to a new area. A hypothetical alternative to this foraging mode is raiding radially and symmetrically by expanding the search front in every direction like a circular bubble. Using an existing agent-based modeling software that simulates army ants behavior, I compared the two possible modes of foraging in different food distributions. Regardless of the food patch abundance, the radial raiding was superior to the directional raiding when food patches had low quality, and the directional raiding was favored when the patches were rich. In terms of energy efficiency, the radial raiding was the better strategy in a wide range of conditions. In contrast, the directional raiding tended to yield more food per coverage area. Based on this model, I suggest that the directional raiding by army ants is an adaptation to the habitats with the abundance of high-quality food patches. This is the first theoretical argument for the adaptive value of the army ant behavioral syndrome which agrees with cumulated body of existing empirical measurements and descriptive models. This conclusion fits well with the known ecological conditions of army ants and their habitat. In the second study, I conducted field experiments using wild colonies of carpenter ants (Camponotus japonicus). Unlike the army ants which obligatorily maintain their tight marching column, C. japonicus shows considerable variation in the coherence when foraging in a group. My investigation on this variability was centered on three sub-questions. First, I observed if higher group dispersion resulted in the lower chances of reaching the food source. As a dispersed group would cover a wider search area collectively, I believed that there would be some balancing disadvantage that can explain the coexistence of coherent and dispersed foraging behaviors. Second, I explored if there is any correlation between the group coherence and the behavior of the scout, the key individual that first discovers the food source and subsequently summons multiple nestmates to the site. As the scouts of related species were known to have central control over their groups of recruits in various ways, I hypothesized that C. japonicus scouts would be also involved in the determination of group behavior. Third, I tested what would happen if I remove the scout from a group. I believed that the lack of scout pheromone would signal dispersion, as the scout seemed to be the source of coherence signals. After my analysis, I reached the following conclusions. First, higher group dispersion leads to lower success rates in correctly finding the food source. Second, the mobility of the scout in the pre-recruitment stage, her characteristic stroking behavior during recruitment, and the dispersion of the recruited group were correlated to each other. Third, the simple lack of scout signal was not adequate to explain the observed variable reactions of the abandoned followers, and their response was linked to the pre-recruitment behaviors of the scout. I believe that C. japonicus possesses one of the most complicated recruitment strategy among the entire Formicidae, and the above findings rendered this species one of the best-understood ants in terms of mechanisms through which the flexible group foraging is controlled. From the above two studies, I revealed each one of the ultimate and proximate mechanisms that maintain different levels of flexibility in ants foraging strategy. My final topic, the behaviorally controlled aposematism, is a variant of aposematism in which the defended prey animal can choose to give different levels of anti-predatory warning signals depending on the circumstances. This switching may occur in reaction to predators approach (pre-attack signals) or attack (post-attack signals). The switchable aposematism has been relatively poorly studied, but it could possess a variety of benefits. First, the switching could startle the predators (deimatism). Second, it could facilitate the aversive learning. Third, it could minimize the exposure or energetic expense, as the signal can be switched off. These potential benefits might offset the cost of developing, maintaining and utilizing the switchable traits. Here I focused on the third benefit of switchability, the cost-saving aspect, and developed an individual-based computer simulation of predators and prey. In 88 128 model runs, I observed the evolution of permanent, pre-attack, or post-attack aposematic signals of varying strength. I found that, in general, the pre-attack switchable aposematism may require moderate predator learning speed, high basal detectability, and moderate to high signal cost. On the other hand, the post-attack signals may arise under slow predator learning, low basal detectability, and high signal cost. When predator population turnover is fast, it may lead to the evolution of post-attack aposematic signals that are not conforming to the above tendency. I also suggest that the high switching cost may exert different pressure on the pre-attack and post-attack switchable strategies. To my knowledge, these are the first theoretical attempts to systematically explore the evolution of the switchable aposematism relative to permanent aposematism in defended prey. These findings in common provided novel view into the proximate and ultimate mechanisms of behavioral flexibility found in insects. In addition, they exposed limitations of our understanding that called for future studies. First, I expect agonistic interactions with competitors or prey animals would considerably affect the collective foraging, aposematism, and food aversion, but I could not successfully provide universal background for such effects within the currently available datasets and literature in spite of many efforts. Second, the qualitative difference of food items such as carbohydrate- or protein-richness is known to be pivotal in insect trophic ecology, but the scarcity of information and logistical limitations left me being unable to incorporate relevant enquiries into this dissertation. I predict that further discussions and experiments regarding these questions will reveal valuable information about the balance between the needs of resource exploitation and defense, which might greatly influence the behavioral flexibility of insects observed in the ecosystem.์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๊ณค์ถฉ ํ–‰๋™ํ•™์ƒ์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ด๋ก ์  ๋ฐ ์‹คํ—˜์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ฃผ์ œ๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์˜ ์ง‘๋‹จ์  ์„ญ์‹ ์ „๋žต์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋จน์ด์ฐพ๊ธฐ ํ–‰๋™์—์„œ ๋งค์šฐ ๋‚ฎ์€ ํ–‰๋™์  ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ์˜ˆ์‹œ๋กœ ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’์€ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ „์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•  ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์™•๊ฐœ๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ํƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ฃผ์ œ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์–ด๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ˜ ํ”ผ์‹๋™๋ฌผ์ด ํฌ์‹์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ฃผ์–ด ๊ทธ ๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ์•Œ๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ, ์ฆ‰ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ (aposematism) ์˜ ํ–‰๋™์  ํ†ต์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์˜ ํŠนํ™”๋œ ์„ญ์‹ ํ–‰๋™์ด ์ง„ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ํ•œ ์ด๋ก ์ ์ธ ์ด์ ๋“ค์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹ ์—ด๋Œ€๊ตฌ ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ (Ecitoninae์•„๊ณผ) ์˜ ์ง‘๋ฝ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ 100์—ฌ ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์— ์ด๋ฅด๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Š๋‹ค๋ž€ ํ–‰๋ ฌ์„ ํŠน์ • ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ง€ํ–ฅํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜์†Œ (bivouac) ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ๊ด‘ํ™œํ•œ ์ง€์—ญ์„ ๊ฐ•์Šตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฐ•์Šต ํ–‰๋™์ด ๋งค๋ฒˆ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ 12-17๋ฒˆ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต๋œ ํ›„ ์ง‘๋ฝ์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ง€์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์ฃผํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋จน์ด์ฐพ๊ธฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๊ฐ€์„ค์ ์ธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์€ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์ , ๋Œ€์นญ์ ์ธ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ๊ฐ•์Šตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์ƒ‰๋Œ€์˜ ์ตœ์ „์„ ์ด ์ ์ฐจ ํ™•์žฅ๋˜๋Š” ์›ํ˜•์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๋„๋ก ์ „์ง„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋จน์ด์ฐพ๊ธฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋จน์ด์ž์› ๋ถ„ํฌ ํ•˜์—์„œ ๋น„๊ตํ•ด๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์˜ ํ–‰๋™์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ฐœ์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋จน์ดํŒจ์น˜์˜ ์งˆ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋จน์ดํŒจ์น˜์˜ ํ’๋ถ€๋„์™€ ๋ฌด๊ด€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํ˜• ๊ฐ•์Šต ํ–‰๋™์€ ์ง€ํ–ฅ์„ฑ ๊ฐ•์Šต๋ณด๋‹ค ์šฐ์›”ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ๋จน์ดํŒจ์น˜์˜ ์งˆ์ด ๋†’์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ง€ํ–ฅ์„ฑ ๊ฐ•์Šต์ด ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํšจ์œจ์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๊ฑธ์ณ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํ˜• ๊ฐ•์Šต์ด ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์ „๋žต์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ์— ๋ฐ˜ํ•ด, ์ง€ํ–ฅ์„ฑ ๊ฐ•์Šต์€ ํƒ์ƒ‰ ๋ฉด์  ๋‹น ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋จน์ด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์˜ ์ง€ํ–ฅ์„ฑ ๊ฐ•์Šต ํ–‰๋™์ด ์–‘์งˆ์˜ ๋จน์ดํŒจ์น˜๊ฐ€ ํ’๋ถ€ํ•œ ์„œ์‹์ง€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ์ ์‘ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ž„์„ ์ฃผ์žฅํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ˆ„์ ๋œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ์ธก์ •๊ฐ’ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค๊ณผ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ ํ–‰๋™๊ตฐ (behavioral syndrome) ์˜ ์ ์‘์  ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋Š” ์ตœ์ดˆ์˜ ์ด๋ก ์  ๋…ผ์ฆ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์€ ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์™€ ๊ทธ ์„œ์‹์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ธฐ์กด์— ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ์ƒํƒœํ•™์  ์ง€์‹๊ณผ ์ž˜ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์™•๊ฐœ๋ฏธ (Camponotus japonicus)์˜ ์•ผ์ƒ ์ง‘๋ฝ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•ผ์™ธ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‘์ง‘๋œ ํ–‰์ง„ ๋Œ€์—ด๋งŒ์„ ์ ˆ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ์ˆ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์™€ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ, C. japonicus๋Š” ์ง‘๋‹จ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋จน์ด๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์„ ๋•Œ ์‘์ง‘๋„์˜ ๋ณ€์‚ฐ์ด ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ํฌ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ์˜ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•˜์œ„ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ด ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ง‘๋‹จ์˜ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์œผ๋ฉด ๋จน์ด์›์— ์ด๋ฅด๋Š” ์„ฑ๊ณต๋ฅ ์ด ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง€๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋Š”๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋œ ์ง‘๋‹จ์€ ์ „์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์•˜์„ ๋•Œ ๋” ๋„“์€ ๋ฉด์ ์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ๊ฐ์•ˆํ•  ๋•Œ, ๊ทธ์— ๋Œ€์‘๋˜๋Š” ๋‹จ์ ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ์‘์ง‘ํ˜• ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์‚ฐํ˜• ์ง‘๋‹จ์ด ๊ณต์กดํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฆฌ๋ผ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์ฒ˜์Œ์œผ๋กœ ๋จน์ด์›์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์ดํ›„์— ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ๋™๋ฃŒ๋“ค์„ ๋ถˆ๋Ÿฌ๋ชจ์œผ๋Š” ์ค‘์‹ฌ ๊ฐœ์ฒด์ธ ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘์˜ ํ–‰๋™์ด ์ง‘๋‹จ์  ์‘์ง‘๋„์™€ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๋Š”์ง€ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทผ์—ฐ์ข…์˜ ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘๋“ค์ด ์†Œ์ง‘๋œ ์ง‘๋‹จ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ํ†ต์ œ๋ ฅ์„ ํ–‰์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ, C. japonicus ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘ ์—ญ์‹œ ์ง‘๋‹จ ํ–‰๋™์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์„ค์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์ง‘๋‹จ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์–ด๋–ค ๋ฐ˜์‘์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š”์ง€ ์‹œํ—˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘์ด ์‘์ง‘ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ๊ทผ์›์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘ ํŽ˜๋กœ๋ชฌ์˜ ๋ถ€์žฌ๋Š” ๊ณง ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋กœ ํ•ด์„๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ๋“ค์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ง‘๋‹จ์˜ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์œผ๋ฉด ๋จน์ด์›์„ ์˜ฌ๋ฐ”๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ฐพ์•„๋‚ด๋Š” ์„ฑ๊ณต๋ฅ ์ด ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง„๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์†Œ์ง‘ ์ „๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘์˜ ์ด๋™์„ฑ, ์†Œ์ง‘ ์ค‘ ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘์˜ ํš๊ธ‹๊ธฐ ํ–‰๋™, ์†Œ์ง‘๋œ ์ง‘๋‹จ์˜ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋„๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‘ ์„œ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ด€๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ๋‹จ์ˆœ ๋ถ€์žฌ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๋‚จ๊ฒจ์ง„ ์ถ”์ข…์ž๋“ค์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋“ค์˜ ๋ฐ˜์‘์€ ์†Œ์ง‘ ์ „๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘์ด ๋ณด์˜€๋˜ ํ–‰๋™๊ณผ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. C. japonicus๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ‹€์–ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์†Œ์ง‘์ „๋žต์„ ์ง€๋‹Œ ์ข… ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์œ„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ง‘๋‹จ์  ์„ญ์‹ํ–‰๋™์˜ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ทธ ์ œ์–ด๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์ด ์ข…์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋„๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ ์ค‘ ์ตœ๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ์ด๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ„์˜ ๋‘ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์˜ ์„ญ์‹ ์ „๋žต์—์„œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์ด ์œ ์ง€๋˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ถ๊ทน์  ๋ฐ ์ง์ ‘์  ๊ธฐ์ „ ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ง€์”ฉ์„ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰ ์ฃผ์ œ๋Š” ํ–‰๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ†ต์ œ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ, ์ฆ‰ ๋ฐฉ์–ด๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ˜ ํ”ผ์‹๋™๋ฌผ์ด ์ƒํ™ฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋ฐ˜ํฌ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ํƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ์ „ํ™˜ ์€ ํฌ์‹์ž์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ์— ๋Œ€์‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ๊ณ  (๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ „ ์‹ ํ˜ธ) ๋˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์— ๋Œ€์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ผ ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค (๊ณต๊ฒฉํ›„ ์‹ ํ˜ธ). ์ „ํ™˜๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Š” ๋น„๊ต์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ž˜ ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋‚˜, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ด์ ์„ ์ง€๋‹ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ „ํ™˜ ํ–‰๋™ ์ž์ฒด๊ฐ€ ํฌ์‹์ž๋ฅผ ๋†€๋ผ๊ฒŒ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ํšŒํ”ผ ํ•™์Šต์„ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๊บผ ๋†“์Œ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ถˆํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋…ธ์ถœ์ด๋‚˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ๋ชจ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ž ์žฌ์ ์ธ ์ด์ ๋“ค์€ ์ „ํ™˜ํ˜• ํ˜•์งˆ์„ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ƒ์‡„ํ•  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ „ํ™˜๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์˜ ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์จฐ ์ด์ , ์ฆ‰ ๋น„์šฉ ์ ˆ๊ฐ ์ธก๋ฉด์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”์–ด ํฌ์‹์ž์™€ ํ”ผ์‹์ž์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 88,128ํšŒ์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ตฌ๋™์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ ์˜๊ตฌ์ , ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ „ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๊ฒฉํ›„ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ์ง„ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ, ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ „ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Š” ์ค‘๋“ฑ๋„์˜ ํฌ์‹์ž ํ•™์Šต์†๋„, ๋†’์€ ๊ธฐ์ € ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋ฅ , ์ค‘๋“ฑ๋„์—์„œ ๊ณ ๋„์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋ฆฌ๋ผ๋Š” ์ ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ์— ๋ฐ˜ํ•ด ๊ณต๊ฒฉํ›„ ์ง„ํ˜ธ๋Š” ๋‚ฎ์€ ํฌ์‹์ž ํ•™์Šต์†๋„, ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ธฐ์ € ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋ฅ , ๋†’์€ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋น„์šฉ ํ•˜์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. ํฌ์‹์ž ๊ฐœ์ฒด๊ตฐ์˜ ํšŒ์ „์ด ๋น ๋ฅธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์œ„์˜ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚œ ๊ณต๊ฒฉํ›„ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ์ง„ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋†’์€ ์ „ํ™˜๋น„์šฉ์ด ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ „ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๊ฒฉํ›„ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ „๋žต์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์••๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ฆฌ๋ผ๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋“ค์€ ๋ฐฉ์–ด๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ํ”ผ์‹๋™๋ฌผ์—์„œ ์˜๊ตฌ์  ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ „ํ™˜๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ์ง„ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ ์ตœ์ดˆ์˜ ์ด๋ก ์  ์‹œ๋„์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋“ค์€ ๊ณตํ†ต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณค์ถฉ์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ํ–‰๋™์  ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์˜ ์ง์ ‘์  ๋ฐ ๊ถ๊ทน์  ๊ธฐ์ „์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‹œ๊ฐ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ํ›„์† ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ดํ•ด์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋…ธ์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์ž๋‚˜ ํ”ผ์‹์ž์™€์˜ ์ ๋Œ€์  ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์ด ์ง‘๋‹จ์„ญ์‹, ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๋ฐ ํšŒํ”ผํ•™์Šต์— ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ผ์น  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋˜๋‚˜, ๋งŽ์€ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ํ˜„์žฌ ๊ฐ€์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ฌธํ—Œ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์ด๊ฐ™์€ ํšจ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ฒ”์šฉ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์ง€์‹์„ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ํƒ„์ˆ˜ํ™”๋ฌผ ๋˜๋Š” ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋จน์ด์ž์›์˜ ์งˆ์  ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ณค์ถฉ์˜ ์˜์–‘์ƒํƒœ์— ์ค‘๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ค€๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ •๋ณด์˜ ํฌ๋ฐ•ํ•จ๊ณผ ์ž์›์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์— ํฌํ•จ์‹œํ‚ค์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์งˆ๋ฌธ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๋…ผ์˜์™€ ์‹คํ—˜์ด ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„๋‹ค๋ฉด, ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„์—์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜๋Š” ๊ณค์ถฉ์˜ ํ–‰๋™์  ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ์„ ์ž์› ํš๋“๊ณผ ๋ฐฉ์–ด์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์น˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ •๋ณด๋“ค์ด ๋ฐํ˜€์ง€๋ฆฌ๋ผ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค.CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1. 1 Opening remarks 1 1. 2 Behavioral flexibility in ant foraging 3 1. 3 Behavioral flexibility in aposematism 5 CHAPTER 2. WHY DO ARMY ANTS, AND ONLY ARMY ANTS, FORAGE IN COLUMNS? 7 2. 1 Introduction 8 2. 2 Methods 9 2. 3 Results 11 2. 4 Discussion 12 CHAPTER 3. COLUMNAR FORAGING WITH VARYING COHESIVENESS: BEHAVIOR OF Camponotus japonicus 20 3. 1 Introduction 20 3. 2 Methods 24 3. 3 Results 33 3. 4 Discussion 35 CHAPTER 4. SWITCHABLE APOSEMATISM: A BEHAVIORALLY CONTROLLED WARNING SIGNAL 65 4. 1 Introduction 66 4. 2 Methods 71 4. 3 Results 90 4. 4 Discussion 93 4. 5 Appendix 122 CHAPTER 5. GENERAL CONCLUSION 140 REFERENCES 145 ๊ตญ ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ ๋ก 159 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 164Docto

    Neighborhood size-effects shape growing population dynamics in evolutionary public goods games

    Get PDF
    An evolutionary game emerges when a subset of individuals incur costs to provide benefits to all individuals. Public goods games (PGG) cover the essence of such dilemmas in which cooperators are prone to exploitation by defectors. We model the population dynamics of a non-linear\ua0PGG and consider density-dependence on the global level, while the game occurs within local neighborhoods. At low cooperation, increases in the public good provide increasing returns. At high cooperation, increases provide diminishing returns. This mechanism leads to diverse evolutionarily stable strategies, including monomorphic and polymorphic populations, and neighborhood-size-driven state changes, resulting in hysteresis between equilibria. Stochastic or strategy-dependent variations in neighborhood sizes favor coexistence by destabilizing monomorphic states. We integrate our model with experiments of cancer cell growth and confirm that our framework describes PGG dynamics observed in cellular populations. Our findings advance the understanding of how neighborhood-size effects in PGG shape the dynamics of growing populations. \ua9 2019, The Author(s)

    Foraging for foundations in decision neuroscience: insights from ethology

    Get PDF
    Modern decision neuroscience offers a powerful and broad account of human behaviour using computational techniques that link psychological and neuroscientific approaches to the ways that individuals can generate near-optimal choices in complex controlled environments. However, until recently, relatively little attention has been paid to the extent to which the structure of experimental environments relates to natural scenarios, and the survival problems that individuals have evolved to solve. This situation not only risks leaving decision-theoretic accounts ungrounded but also makes various aspects of the solutions, such as hard-wired or Pavlovian policies, difficult to interpret in the natural world. Here, we suggest importing concepts, paradigms and approaches from the fields of ethology and behavioural ecology, which concentrate on the contextual and functional correlates of decisions made about foraging and escape and address these lacunae

    Influence of Vectors' Risk-Spreading Strategies and Environmental Stochasticity on the Epidemiology and Evolution of Vector-Borne Diseases: The Example of Chagas' Disease

    Get PDF
    Insects are known to display strategies that spread the risk of encountering unfavorable conditions, thereby decreasing the extinction probability of genetic lineages in unpredictable environments. To what extent these strategies influence the epidemiology and evolution of vector-borne diseases in stochastic environments is largely unknown. In triatomines, the vectors of the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiological agent of Chagas' disease, juvenile development time varies between individuals and such variation most likely decreases the extinction risk of vector populations in stochastic environments. We developed a simplified multi-stage vector-borne SI epidemiological model to investigate how vector risk-spreading strategies and environmental stochasticity influence the prevalence and evolution of a parasite. This model is based on available knowledge on triatomine biodemography, but its conceptual outcomes apply, to a certain extent, to other vector-borne diseases. Model comparisons between deterministic and stochastic settings led to the conclusion that environmental stochasticity, vector risk-spreading strategies (in particular an increase in the length and variability of development time) and their interaction have drastic consequences on vector population dynamics, disease prevalence, and the relative short-term evolution of parasite virulence. Our work shows that stochastic environments and associated risk-spreading strategies can increase the prevalence of vector-borne diseases and favor the invasion of more virulent parasite strains on relatively short evolutionary timescales. This study raises new questions and challenges in a context of increasingly unpredictable environmental variations as a result of global climate change and human interventions such as habitat destruction or vector control.Centro de Estudios Parasitolรณgicos y de Vectore

    Influence of Vectors' Risk-Spreading Strategies and Environmental Stochasticity on the Epidemiology and Evolution of Vector-Borne Diseases: The Example of Chagas' Disease

    Get PDF
    Insects are known to display strategies that spread the risk of encountering unfavorable conditions, thereby decreasing the extinction probability of genetic lineages in unpredictable environments. To what extent these strategies influence the epidemiology and evolution of vector-borne diseases in stochastic environments is largely unknown. In triatomines, the vectors of the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiological agent of Chagas' disease, juvenile development time varies between individuals and such variation most likely decreases the extinction risk of vector populations in stochastic environments. We developed a simplified multi-stage vector-borne SI epidemiological model to investigate how vector risk-spreading strategies and environmental stochasticity influence the prevalence and evolution of a parasite. This model is based on available knowledge on triatomine biodemography, but its conceptual outcomes apply, to a certain extent, to other vector-borne diseases. Model comparisons between deterministic and stochastic settings led to the conclusion that environmental stochasticity, vector risk-spreading strategies (in particular an increase in the length and variability of development time) and their interaction have drastic consequences on vector population dynamics, disease prevalence, and the relative short-term evolution of parasite virulence. Our work shows that stochastic environments and associated risk-spreading strategies can increase the prevalence of vector-borne diseases and favor the invasion of more virulent parasite strains on relatively short evolutionary timescales. This study raises new questions and challenges in a context of increasingly unpredictable environmental variations as a result of global climate change and human interventions such as habitat destruction or vector control.Centro de Estudios Parasitolรณgicos y de Vectore
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore