A Review of Control Strategies in Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetic Systems

It has been widely recognized that closed-loop neuroprosthetic systems achieve more favourable outcomes for users then equivalent open-loop devices. Improved performance of tasks, better usability and greater embodiment have all been reported in systems utilizing some form of feedback. However the interdisciplinary work on neuroprosthetic systems can lead to miscommunication due to similarities in well established nomenclature in different fields. Here we present a review of control strategies in existing experimental, investigational and clinical neuroprosthetic systems in order to establish a baseline and promote a common understanding of different feedback modes and closed loop controllers. The first section provides a brief discussion of feedback control and control theory. The second section reviews the control strategies of recent Brain Machine Interfaces, neuromodulatory implants, neuroprosthetic systems and assistive neurorobotic devices. The final section examines the different approaches to feedback in current neuroprosthetic and neurorobotic systems

Sci Transl Med

Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) are artificial systems that aim to restore sensation and movement to paralyzed patients. So far, BMIs have enabled only one arm to be moved at a time. Control of bimanual arm movements remains a major challenge. We have developed and tested a bimanual BMI that enables rhesus monkeys to control two avatar arms simultaneously. The bimanual BMI was based on the extracellular activity of 374 to 497 neurons recorded from several frontal and parietal cortical areas of both cerebral hemispheres. Cortical activity was transformed into movements of the two arms with a decoding algorithm called a fifth-order unscented Kalman filter (UKF). The UKF was trained either during a manual task performed with two joysticks or by having the monkeys passively observe the movements of avatar arms. Most cortical neurons changed their modulation patterns when both arms were engaged simultaneously. Representing the two arms jointly in a single UKF decoder resulted in improved decoding performance compared with using separate decoders for each arm. As the animals' performance in bimanual BMI control improved over time, we observed widespread plasticity in frontal and parietal cortical areas. Neuronal representation of the avatar and reach targets was enhanced with learning, whereas pairwise correlations between neurons initially increased and then decreased. These results suggest that cortical networks may assimilate the two avatar arms through BMI control. These findings should help in the design of more sophisticated BMIs capable of enabling bimanual motor control in human patients.F31 NS081931/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United StatesDP1MH099903/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United StatesR01NS073952/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United StatesDP1 MH099903/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United StatesR01 NS073952/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States2014-11-06T00:00:00Z24197735PMC3967722vault:237

Brain-Machine Interface for Reaching: Accounting for Target Size, Multiple Motor Plans, and Bimanual Coordination

<p>Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) offer the potential to assist millions of people worldwide suffering from immobility due to loss of limbs, paralysis, and neurodegenerative diseases. BMIs function by decoding neural activity from intact cortical brain regions in order to control external devices in real-time. While there has been exciting progress in the field over the past 15 years, the vast majority of the work has focused on restoring of motor function of a single limb. In the work presented in this thesis, I first investigate the expanded role of primary sensory (S1) and motor (M1) cortex during reaching movements. By varying target size during reaching movements, I discovered the cortical correlates of the speed-accuracy tradeoff known as Fitts' law. Similarly, I analyzed cortical motor processing during tasks where the motor plan is quickly reprogrammed. In each study, I found that parameters relevant to the reach, such as target size or alternative movement plans, could be extracted by neural decoders in addition to simple kinematic parameters such as velocity and position. As such, future BMI functionality could expand to account for relevant sensory information and reliably decode intended reach trajectories, even amidst transiently considered alternatives.</p><p> The second portion of my thesis work was the successful development of the first bimanual brain-machine interface. To reach this goal, I expanded the neural recordings system to enable bilateral, multi-site recordings from approximately 500 neurons simultaneously. In addition, I upgraded the experiment to feature a realistic virtual reality end effector, customized primate chair, and eye tracking system. Thirdly, I modified the tuning function of the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) to conjointly represent both arms in a single 4D model. As a result of widespread cortical plasticity in M1, S1, supplementary motor area (SMA), and posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the bimanual BMI enabled rhesus monkeys to simultaneously control two virtual limbs without any movement of their own body. I demonstrate the efficacy of the bimanual BMI in both a subject with prior task training using joysticks and a subject naïve to the task altogether, which simulates a common clinical scenario. The neural decoding algorithm was selected as a result of a methodical comparison between various neural decoders and decoder settings. I lastly introduce a two-stage switching model with a classify step and predict step which was designed and tested to generalize decoding strategies to include both unimanual and bimanual movements.</p>Dissertatio