Separations of Matroid Freeness Properties

Properties of Boolean functions on the hypercube invariant with respect to linear transformations of the domain are among the most well-studied properties in the context of property testing. In this paper, we study the fundamental class of linear-invariant properties called matroid freeness properties. These properties have been conjectured to essentially coincide with all testable linear-invariant properties, and a recent sequence of works has established testability for increasingly larger subclasses. One question left open, however, is whether the infinitely many syntactically different properties recently shown testable in fact correspond to new, semantically distinct ones. This is a crucial issue since it has also been shown that there exist subclasses of these properties for which an infinite set of syntactically different representations collapse into one of a small, finite set of properties, all previously known to be testable. An important question is therefore to understand the semantics of matroid freeness properties, and in particular when two syntactically different properties are truly distinct. We shed light on this problem by developing a method for determining the relation between two matroid freeness properties P and Q. Furthermore, we show that there is a natural subclass of matroid freeness properties such that for any two properties P and Q from this subclass, a strong dichotomy must hold: either P is contained in Q or the two properties are "well separated." As an application of this method, we exhibit new, infinite hierarchies of testable matroid freeness properties such that at each level of the hierarchy, there are functions that are far from all functions lying in lower levels of the hierarchy. Our key technical tool is an apparently new notion of maps between linear matroids, called matroid homomorphisms, that might be of independent interest

Testing Linear-Invariant Non-Linear Properties

We consider the task of testing properties of Boolean functions that are invariant under linear transformations of the Boolean cube. Previous work in property testing, including the linearity test and the test for Reed-Muller codes, has mostly focused on such tasks for linear properties. The one exception is a test due to Green for "triangle freeness": a function f:\cube^{n}\to\cube satisfies this property if $f(x),f(y),f(x+y)$ do not all equal 1, for any pair x,y\in\cube^{n}. Here we extend this test to a more systematic study of testing for linear-invariant non-linear properties. We consider properties that are described by a single forbidden pattern (and its linear transformations), i.e., a property is given by $k$ points v_{1},...,v_{k}\in\cube^{k} and f:\cube^{n}\to\cube satisfies the property that if for all linear maps L:\cube^{k}\to\cube^{n} it is the case that $f(L(v_{1})),...,f(L(v_{k}))$ do not all equal 1. We show that this property is testable if the underlying matroid specified by $v_{1},...,v_{k}$ is a graphic matroid. This extends Green's result to an infinite class of new properties. Our techniques extend those of Green and in particular we establish a link between the notion of "1-complexity linear systems" of Green and Tao, and graphic matroids, to derive the results.Comment: This is the full version; conference version appeared in the proceedings of STACS 200

Testing Low Complexity Affine-Invariant Properties

Invariance with respect to linear or affine transformations of the domain is arguably the most common symmetry exhibited by natural algebraic properties. In this work, we show that any low complexity affine-invariant property of multivariate functions over finite fields is testable with a constant number of queries. This immediately reproves, for instance, that the Reed-Muller code over F_p of degree d < p is testable, with an argument that uses no detailed algebraic information about polynomials except that low degree is preserved by composition with affine maps. The complexity of an affine-invariant property P refers to the maximum complexity, as defined by Green and Tao (Ann. Math. 2008), of the sets of linear forms used to characterize P. A more precise statement of our main result is that for any fixed prime p >=2 and fixed integer R >= 2, any affine-invariant property P of functions f: F_p^n -> [R] is testable, assuming the complexity of the property is less than p. Our proof involves developing analogs of graph-theoretic techniques in an algebraic setting, using tools from higher-order Fourier analysis.Comment: 38 pages, appears in SODA '1

Property Testing via Set-Theoretic Operations

Given two testable properties $\mathcal{P}_{1}$ and $\mathcal{P}_{2}$, under what conditions are the union, intersection or set-difference of these two properties also testable? We initiate a systematic study of these basic set-theoretic operations in the context of property testing. As an application, we give a conceptually different proof that linearity is testable, albeit with much worse query complexity. Furthermore, for the problem of testing disjunction of linear functions, which was previously known to be one-sided testable with a super-polynomial query complexity, we give an improved analysis and show it has query complexity O(1/\eps^2), where \eps is the distance parameter.Comment: Appears in ICS 201

The Empirical Implications of Privacy-Aware Choice

This paper initiates the study of the testable implications of choice data in settings where agents have privacy preferences. We adapt the standard conceptualization of consumer choice theory to a situation where the consumer is aware of, and has preferences over, the information revealed by her choices. The main message of the paper is that little can be inferred about consumers' preferences once we introduce the possibility that the consumer has concerns about privacy. This holds even when consumers' privacy preferences are assumed to be monotonic and separable. This motivates the consideration of stronger assumptions and, to that end, we introduce an additive model for privacy preferences that does have testable implications