5,643 research outputs found

    Ontology based Scene Creation for the Development of Automated Vehicles

    Full text link
    The introduction of automated vehicles without permanent human supervision demands a functional system description, including functional system boundaries and a comprehensive safety analysis. These inputs to the technical development can be identified and analyzed by a scenario-based approach. Furthermore, to establish an economical test and release process, a large number of scenarios must be identified to obtain meaningful test results. Experts are doing well to identify scenarios that are difficult to handle or unlikely to happen. However, experts are unlikely to identify all scenarios possible based on the knowledge they have on hand. Expert knowledge modeled for computer aided processing may help for the purpose of providing a wide range of scenarios. This contribution reviews ontologies as knowledge-based systems in the field of automated vehicles, and proposes a generation of traffic scenes in natural language as a basis for a scenario creation.Comment: Accepted at the 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 8 pages, 10 figure

    ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ ํ•˜ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ฒฝํ—˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค ์ˆ˜์ค€ ๋ฐ ์ฃผ์˜ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฐจ์ด ๋น„๊ต

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์ธ๋ฌธ๋Œ€ํ•™ ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ์ธ์ง€๊ณผํ•™์ „๊ณต, 2021. 2. ์œค๋ช…ํ™˜.The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in stress-level and attentional functions between experienced and non-experienced drivers during intersection-related hazard situations. A simulation experiment was conducted to twenty-one licensed drivers (15 males and 6 females, mean age 27.71 ยฑ 3.62) which were categorized into two groups, experienced and novice, based on the frequency and length of their driving experience. The participants were asked to drive on the same lane at a constant speed for 9 randomized trials with three different conditions (no hazard, low hazard, high hazard). ECG, GSR and eye-tracking data were collected throughout the whole session and a subjective questionnaire measuring perceived stress and attention load was administered after every trial. Mixed-ANOVA showed significant variations in driving performance across conditions (p < 0.001 for both lane and speed deviation), but not in between groups. Similarly, GSR metrics (SCR, Sum of Amplitudes, Phasic Max) showed a progressive increase in stress from hazard conditions 1 to 3, but no differences were found between groups. In contrast, ECG measures (STD RR, RMSSD, HF) revealed that experienced drivers exhibited greater stress during intersection-related hazard situations than novices. In terms of attention, both AOI-based and non-AOI-based measures (fixation count, mean fixation duration, time-to-first-fixation and horizontal dispersion) demonstrate significant differences in attention functions across conditions, but group effects were only evident in time-to-first fixation metrics. It was revealed that experienced drivers were faster to attend to the hazard stimulus than novices. In addition, an interaction was also found between experience and condition in mean fixation duration. Experienced drivers showed proportional attention allocation to both the primary task and hazard stimulus during high hazard situations than novice drivers. The overall result of the psychophysiological measures was further affirmed by the results from the subjective questionnaire whereby experienced drivers exhibited more changes in stress-level and attention load as the condition changed. The results suggest that experienced drivers are more sensitive, in terms of stress and attention functions, to changes in driving conditions than novices. The results of this study may be applied in designing more effective training modules and driver support systems that would help drivers specifically during intersection-related hazard situations.๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๊ต์ฐจ๋กœ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ ํ•˜์—์„œ ์šด์ „ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ฐ„ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค ์ˆ˜์ค€๊ณผ ์ฃผ์˜ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์šด์ „ ๋นˆ๋„ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ˆ™๋ จ๋œ ์šด์ „์ž์™€ ๋ฏธ์ˆ™ํ•œ ์šด์ „์ž์˜ ๋‘ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋œ ์šด์ „๋ฉดํ—ˆ ์ž๊ฒฉ์„ ๋ณด์œ ํ•œ 21๋ช…์˜ ์šด์ „์ž๋“ค (๋‚จ์„ฑ 15๋ช…, ์—ฌ์„ฑ 6๋ช…, ํ‰๊ท  27.71 ยฑ 3.62์„ธ)์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋“ค์€ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ ์กฐ๊ฑด(๋ฌด์œ„ํ—˜, ์ €์œ„ํ—˜, ๊ณ ์œ„ํ—˜)์ด ์ž„์˜๋กœ ์ œ์‹œ๋˜๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋™์ผ ์ฐจ์„ ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ •์† ์ฃผํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์—…์„ 9ํšŒ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ณผ์—…์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ECG, GSR, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์‹œ์„  ์ถ”์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ๊ณผ์—… ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ์ข…๋ฃŒ ํ›„ ์ฃผ๊ด€์  ์„ค๋ฌธ์ง€๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธ์ง€๋œ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค ๋ฐ ์ฃผ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ•˜๊ฐ€ ์ธก์ •๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. Mixed-ANOVA ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์šด์ „ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋„๋Š” ์ฐจ์„  ์ดํƒˆ ๋ฐ ์†๋„ ์ดํƒˆ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ณ„ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜(p < 0.001), ์šด์ „ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, GSR ์ฒ™๋„(SCR, Sum of Amplitudes, Phasic Max)๋Š” ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ ์ˆ˜์ค€์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค๊ฐ€ ์ ์ง„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์šด์ „ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ECG ์ฒ™๋„(STD RR, RMSSD, HF)๋Š” ์ˆ™๋ จ๋œ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน์ด ๋ฏธ์ˆ™ํ•œ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ต์ฐจ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ จ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ ๋™์•ˆ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ, ์ฃผ์˜ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ AOI์™€ non-AOI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹œ์„  ์ถ”์  ์ฒ™๋„(fixation count, mean fixation duration, time-to-first-fixation and horizontal dispersion)๋Š” ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ณ„ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์šด์ „ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” time-to-first-fixation์—์„œ๋งŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ˆ™๋ จ๋œ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน์ด ๋ฏธ์ˆ™ํ•œ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน๋ณด๋‹ค ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ž๊ทน์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ ์†ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ฒŒ๋‹ค๊ฐ€, mean fixation duration์—์„œ๋Š” ์šด์ „ ๊ฒฝํ—˜๊ณผ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ๊ตํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ํšจ๊ณผ ๋˜ํ•œ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ™๋ จ๋œ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน์€ ๋ฏธ์ˆ™ํ•œ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ณ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ ํ•˜์—์„œ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ณผ์—…๊ณผ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ž๊ทน ๋ชจ๋‘์— ๋น„๋ก€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฃผ์˜๋ฅผ ํ• ๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ˆ™๋ จ๋œ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน์ด ๋ฏธ์ˆ™ํ•œ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน๋ณด๋‹ค ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ๋ณ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค ์ˆ˜์ค€๊ณผ ์ฃผ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ•˜์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋” ์‹ฌํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์‹ฌ๋ฆฌ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์ฒ™๋„๋“ค์˜ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ฃผ๊ด€์  ์„ค๋ฌธ์ง€์˜ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ™•์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ๊ด€์  ์„ค๋ฌธ์ง€์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋˜ํ•œ ์ˆ™๋ จ๋œ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน์ด ๋ฏธ์ˆ™ํ•œ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน๋ณด๋‹ค ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค์™€ ์ฃผ์˜ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ˆ™๋ จ๋œ ์šด์ „์ž์™€ ๋ฏธ์ˆ™ํ•œ ์šด์ „์ž์˜ ๋‘ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ„ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ–ฅํ›„ ๊ต์ฐจ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ จ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ ํ•˜์—์„œ ์šด์ „์ž์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์— ๋„์›€์„ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ง€์› ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณผ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ํ›ˆ๋ จ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.Abstract i Contents ii List of Tables iv List of Figures v Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research Objectives 4 1.3 Organization of the Thesis 4 Chapter 2 Literature Review 5 2.1 Overview 5 2.2 Driving Experience and Performance 5 2.3 Stress 8 2.3.1 Stress and Driving 9 2.3.2 Driving Experience and Stress Susceptibility 11 2.3.3 Psychophysiological Measures of Stress 12 2.3.4 Subjective Measures of Stress 14 2.4 Attentional Functions 15 2.4.1 Attention and Driving 16 2.4.2 Driving Experience and Attention 18 2.4.3 Eye-tracking Measures of Attention 20 2.4.4 Subjective Measures of Attention 21 Chapter 3 Driving Simulation Experiment 22 3.1 Overview and Hypotheses 22 3.2 Methods 23 3.2.1 Participants 23 3.2.2 Apparatus 24 3.2.3 Measures 26 3.2.4 Experimental Design 27 3.2.5 Experimental Procedure 29 3.2.6 Data Analysis 30 3.3 Results 31 Chapter 4 Discussion 58 4.1 Driving Performance 58 4.2 Stress Level 59 4.3 Attentional Functions 62 Chapter 5 Conclusion 65 5.1 Conclusion 65 5.2 Future Direction 65 Bibliography 66 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 77Maste

    Autonomous navigation in interaction-based environments - a case of non-signalised roundabouts

    Get PDF
    To reduce the number of collision fatalities at crossroads intersections many countries have started replacing intersections with non-signalised roundabouts, forcing the drivers to be more situationally aware and to adapt their behaviours according to the scenario. A non-signalised roundabout adds to the autonomous vehicle planning challenge, as navigating such interaction dependent scenarios safely, efficiently and comfortably has been a challenge even for human drivers. Unlike traffic signal controlled roundabouts where the merging order is centrally controlled, driving a non-signalised roundabout requires the individual actor to make the decision to merge based on the movement of other interacting actors. Most traditional autonomous planning approaches use rule-based speed assignment for generating admissible motion trajectories, which work successfully in non-interaction-based driving scenarios. They, however, are less effective in interaction-based scenarios as they lack the necessary ability to adapt the vehicle's motion according to the evolving driving scenario. In this paper, we demonstrate an Adaptive Tactical Behaviour Planner (ATBP) for an autonomous vehicle that is capable of planning human-like motion behaviours for navigating a non-signalised roundabout, combining naturalistic behaviour planning and tactical decision-making algorithm. The human driving simulator experiment used to learn the behaviour planning approach and ATBP design are described in the paper

    Human Motion Trajectory Prediction: A Survey

    Full text link
    With growing numbers of intelligent autonomous systems in human environments, the ability of such systems to perceive, understand and anticipate human behavior becomes increasingly important. Specifically, predicting future positions of dynamic agents and planning considering such predictions are key tasks for self-driving vehicles, service robots and advanced surveillance systems. This paper provides a survey of human motion trajectory prediction. We review, analyze and structure a large selection of work from different communities and propose a taxonomy that categorizes existing methods based on the motion modeling approach and level of contextual information used. We provide an overview of the existing datasets and performance metrics. We discuss limitations of the state of the art and outline directions for further research.Comment: Submitted to the International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR), 37 page

    The Impact of First-Person Perspective Text and Images on Driversโ€™ Comprehension, Learning Judgments, Attitudes, and Intentions Related to Safe Road-Sharing Behaviors

    Get PDF
    Drivers and cyclists lack an alignment of road sharing knowledge, attitudes, and expectations, resulting in unnecessary fatalities. Educational countermeasures need to present information that captures driversโ€™ interest by being personally relevant, facilitate elaboration and synthesis of new information with existing knowledge, and change attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Well-documented health-related communication methods were employed to determine their effectiveness in a transportation domain. Health countermeasure designers use first-person perspective to improve narrative instruction outcomes, based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM; Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). Exploring narrative perspective-taking as a design tool requires the integration of multiple disciplines. Our design case stems from the existing Virginia road-sharing safety educational handbook. The first study evaluated the effects of text-based information written from a first- and third-person perspective on cognitive and affective learning outcomes. The Theory of Planned Behavior framework (TPB; Ajzen, 1991) was used to interpret the following outcome measurements that are predictive of behavior: comprehension, judgments of learning, attitudes, and intentions. The second study employed the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML; Mayer, 1997) to understand the interactions between text and visual perspectives on cognitive and affective learning outcomes. In addition, cognitive load, multiple knowledge types, and three behavioral intention components were also considered when evaluating the efficacy of first-person perspective. It was found that the first-person perspective effect used in the health domain does not transfer to a transportation domain. The data were explored further and discussed, as well as key limitations and possible future directions

    Mobility and Aging: Older Driversโ€™ Visual Searching, Lane Keeping and Coordination

    Get PDF
    This thesis examined older driversโ€™ mobility and behaviour through comprehensive measurements of driver-vehicle-environment interaction and investigated the associations between driving behaviour and cognitive functions. Data were collected and analysed for 50 older drivers using eye tracking, GNSS tracking, and GIS. Results showed that poor selective attention, spatial ability and executive function in older drivers adversely affect lane keeping, visual search and coordination. Visual-motor coordination measure is sensitive and effective for driving assessment in older drivers
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore