132,629 research outputs found
Equal Opportunity in Online Classification with Partial Feedback
We study an online classification problem with partial feedback in which
individuals arrive one at a time from a fixed but unknown distribution, and
must be classified as positive or negative. Our algorithm only observes the
true label of an individual if they are given a positive classification. This
setting captures many classification problems for which fairness is a concern:
for example, in criminal recidivism prediction, recidivism is only observed if
the inmate is released; in lending applications, loan repayment is only
observed if the loan is granted. We require that our algorithms satisfy common
statistical fairness constraints (such as equalizing false positive or negative
rates -- introduced as "equal opportunity" in Hardt et al. (2016)) at every
round, with respect to the underlying distribution. We give upper and lower
bounds characterizing the cost of this constraint in terms of the regret rate
(and show that it is mild), and give an oracle efficient algorithm that
achieves the upper bound.Comment: The Conference version of this paper appears in the Proceedings of
NeurIPS 2019. 29 page
Equal Opportunity in Online Classification with Partial Feedback
We study an online classification problem with partial feedback in which individuals arrive one at a time from a fixed but unknown distribution, and must be classified as positive or negative. Our algorithm only observes the true label of an individual if they are given a positive classification. This setting captures many classification problems for which fairness is a concern: for example, in criminal recidivism prediction, recidivism is only observed if the inmate is released; in lending applications, loan repayment is only observed if the loan is granted. We require that our algorithms satisfy common statistical fairness constraints (such as equalizing false positive or negative rates --- introduced as "equal opportunity" in Hardt et al. (2016)) at every round, with respect to the underlying distribution. We give upper and lower bounds characterizing the cost of this constraint in terms of the regret rate (and show that it is mild), and give an oracle efficient algorithm that achieves the upper bound
Online learning in repeated auctions
Motivated by online advertising auctions, we consider repeated Vickrey
auctions where goods of unknown value are sold sequentially and bidders only
learn (potentially noisy) information about a good's value once it is
purchased. We adopt an online learning approach with bandit feedback to model
this problem and derive bidding strategies for two models: stochastic and
adversarial. In the stochastic model, the observed values of the goods are
random variables centered around the true value of the good. In this case,
logarithmic regret is achievable when competing against well behaved
adversaries. In the adversarial model, the goods need not be identical and we
simply compare our performance against that of the best fixed bid in hindsight.
We show that sublinear regret is also achievable in this case and prove
matching minimax lower bounds. To our knowledge, this is the first complete set
of strategies for bidders participating in auctions of this type
Cooperative Online Learning: Keeping your Neighbors Updated
We study an asynchronous online learning setting with a network of agents. At
each time step, some of the agents are activated, requested to make a
prediction, and pay the corresponding loss. The loss function is then revealed
to these agents and also to their neighbors in the network. Our results
characterize how much knowing the network structure affects the regret as a
function of the model of agent activations. When activations are stochastic,
the optimal regret (up to constant factors) is shown to be of order
, where is the horizon and is the independence
number of the network. We prove that the upper bound is achieved even when
agents have no information about the network structure. When activations are
adversarial the situation changes dramatically: if agents ignore the network
structure, a lower bound on the regret can be proven, showing that
learning is impossible. However, when agents can choose to ignore some of their
neighbors based on the knowledge of the network structure, we prove a
sublinear regret bound, where is the clique-covering number of the network
Taking over someone else's design: implications for the tutor's role in networked learning
The experience of taking over an already designed Web-based course helps us to investigate the claims in the literature about the role that tutors have more generally in networked learning. This paper addresses this issue through a case study and brings together the tutor's experience and her reflective diary, as well as the interview data from a JISC/CALT phenomenographic study of tutors' and students' experiences. This particular case study raises issues about the tutors' role, teaching activity, design and the value of content resources and knowledge representation. Finally the paper reflects on the implications for the tutor in this situation and provides suggestions for future practice
Sequential learning without feedback
In many security and healthcare systems a sequence of features/sensors/tests are used for detection and diagnosis. Each test outputs a prediction of the latent state, and carries with it inherent costs. Our objective is to {\it learn} strategies for selecting tests to optimize accuracy \& costs. Unfortunately it is often impossible to acquire in-situ ground truth annotations and we are left with the problem of unsupervised sensor selection (USS). We pose USS as a version of stochastic partial monitoring problem with an {\it unusual} reward structure (even noisy annotations are unavailable). Unsurprisingly no learner can achieve sublinear regret without further assumptions. To this end we propose the notion of weak-dominance. This is a condition on the joint probability distribution of test outputs and latent state and says that whenever a test is accurate on an example, a later test in the sequence is likely to be accurate as well. We empirically verify that weak dominance holds on real datasets and prove that it is a maximal condition for achieving sublinear regret. We reduce USS to a special case of multi-armed bandit problem with side information and develop polynomial time algorithms that achieve sublinear regret
Sequential learning without feedback
In many security and healthcare systems a sequence of features/sensors/tests are used for detection and diagnosis. Each test outputs a prediction of the latent state, and carries with it inherent costs. Our objective is to {\it learn} strategies for selecting tests to optimize accuracy \& costs. Unfortunately it is often impossible to acquire in-situ ground truth annotations and we are left with the problem of unsupervised sensor selection (USS). We pose USS as a version of stochastic partial monitoring problem with an {\it unusual} reward structure (even noisy annotations are unavailable). Unsurprisingly no learner can achieve sublinear regret without further assumptions. To this end we propose the notion of weak-dominance. This is a condition on the joint probability distribution of test outputs and latent state and says that whenever a test is accurate on an example, a later test in the sequence is likely to be accurate as well. We empirically verify that weak dominance holds on real datasets and prove that it is a maximal condition for achieving sublinear regret. We reduce USS to a special case of multi-armed bandit problem with side information and develop polynomial time algorithms that achieve sublinear regret
- …