Efficient Generation of Parallel Spin-images Using Dynamic Loop Scheduling

High performance computing (HPC) systems underwent a significant increase in their processing capabilities. Modern HPC systems combine large numbers of homogeneous and heterogeneous computing resources. Scalability is, therefore, an essential aspect of scientific applications to efficiently exploit the massive parallelism of modern HPC systems. This work introduces an efficient version of the parallel spin-image algorithm (PSIA), called EPSIA. The PSIA is a parallel version of the spin-image algorithm (SIA). The (P)SIA is used in various domains, such as 3D object recognition, categorization, and 3D face recognition. EPSIA refers to the extended version of the PSIA that integrates various well-known dynamic loop scheduling (DLS) techniques. The present work: (1) Proposes EPSIA, a novel flexible version of PSIA; (2) Showcases the benefits of applying DLS techniques for optimizing the performance of the PSIA; (3) Assesses the performance of the proposed EPSIA by conducting several scalability experiments. The performance results are promising and show that using well-known DLS techniques, the performance of the EPSIA outperforms the performance of the PSIA by a factor of 1.2 and 2 for homogeneous and heterogeneous computing resources, respectively

Hierarchical Dynamic Loop Self-Scheduling on Distributed-Memory Systems Using an MPI+MPI Approach

Computationally-intensive loops are the primary source of parallelism in scientific applications. Such loops are often irregular and a balanced execution of their loop iterations is critical for achieving high performance. However, several factors may lead to an imbalanced load execution, such as problem characteristics, algorithmic, and systemic variations. Dynamic loop self-scheduling (DLS) techniques are devised to mitigate these factors, and consequently, improve application performance. On distributed-memory systems, DLS techniques can be implemented using a hierarchical master-worker execution model and are, therefore, called hierarchical DLS techniques. These techniques self-schedule loop iterations at two levels of hardware parallelism: across and within compute nodes. Hybrid programming approaches that combine the message passing interface (MPI) with open multi-processing (OpenMP) dominate the implementation of hierarchical DLS techniques. The MPI-3 standard includes the feature of sharing memory regions among MPI processes. This feature introduced the MPI+MPI approach that simplifies the implementation of parallel scientific applications. The present work designs and implements hierarchical DLS techniques by exploiting the MPI+MPI approach. Four well-known DLS techniques are considered in the evaluation proposed herein. The results indicate certain performance advantages of the proposed approach compared to the hybrid MPI+OpenMP approach

Dynamic Loop Scheduling Using MPI Passive-Target Remote Memory Access

Scientific applications often contain large computationally-intensive parallel loops. Loop scheduling techniques aim to achieve load balanced executions of such applications. For distributed-memory systems, existing dynamic loop scheduling (DLS) libraries are typically MPI-based, and employ a master-worker execution model to assign variably-sized chunks of loop iterations. The master-worker execution model may adversely impact performance due to the master-level contention. This work proposes a distributed chunk-calculation approach that does not require the master-worker execution scheme. Moreover, it considers the novel features in the latest MPI standards, such as passive-target remote memory access, shared-memory window creation, and atomic read-modify-write operations. To evaluate the proposed approach, five well-known DLS techniques, two applications, and two heterogeneous hardware setups have been considered. The DLS techniques implemented using the proposed approach outperformed their counterparts implemented using the traditional master-worker execution model

rDLB: A Novel Approach for Robust Dynamic Load Balancing of Scientific Applications with Parallel Independent Tasks

Scientific applications often contain large and computationally intensive parallel loops. Dynamic loop self scheduling (DLS) is used to achieve a balanced load execution of such applications on high performance computing (HPC) systems. Large HPC systems are vulnerable to processors or node failures and perturbations in the availability of resources. Most self-scheduling approaches do not consider fault-tolerant scheduling or depend on failure or perturbation detection and react by rescheduling failed tasks. In this work, a robust dynamic load balancing (rDLB) approach is proposed for the robust self scheduling of independent tasks. The proposed approach is proactive and does not depend on failure or perturbation detection. The theoretical analysis of the proposed approach shows that it is linearly scalable and its cost decrease quadratically by increasing the system size. rDLB is integrated into an MPI DLS library to evaluate its performance experimentally with two computationally intensive scientific applications. Results show that rDLB enables the tolerance of up to (P minus one) processor failures, where P is the number of processors executing an application. In the presence of perturbations, rDLB boosted the robustness of DLS techniques up to 30 times and decreased application execution time up to 7 times compared to their counterparts without rDLB

Performance Reproduction and Prediction of Selected Dynamic Loop Scheduling Experiments

Scientific applications are complex, large, and often exhibit irregular and stochastic behavior. The use of efficient loop scheduling techniques in computationally-intensive applications is crucial for improving their performance on high-performance computing (HPC) platforms. A number of dynamic loop scheduling (DLS) techniques have been proposed between the late 1980s and early 2000s, and efficiently used in scientific applications. In most cases, the computing systems on which they have been tested and validated are no longer available. This work is concerned with the minimization of the sources of uncertainty in the implementation of DLS techniques to avoid unnecessary influences on the performance of scientific applications. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the DLS techniques employed in scientific applications today adhere to their original design goals and specifications. The goal of this work is to attain and increase the trust in the implementation of DLS techniques in present studies. To achieve this goal, the performance of a selection of scheduling experiments from the 1992 original work that introduced factoring is reproduced and predicted via both, simulative and native experimentation. The experiments show that the simulation reproduces the performance achieved on the past computing platform and accurately predicts the performance achieved on the present computing platform. The performance reproduction and prediction confirm that the present implementation of the DLS techniques considered both, in simulation and natively, adheres to their original description. The results confirm the hypothesis that reproducing experiments of identical scheduling scenarios on past and modern hardware leads to an entirely different behavior from expected

SiL: An Approach for Adjusting Applications to Heterogeneous Systems Under Perturbations

Scientific applications consist of large and computationally-intensive loops. Dynamic loop scheduling (DLS) techniques are used to load balance the execution of such applications. Load imbalance can be caused by variations in loop iteration execution times due to problem, algorithmic, or systemic characteristics (also, perturbations). The following question motivates this work: "Given an application, a high-performance computing (HPC) system, and both their characteristics and interplay, which DLS technique will achieve improved performance under unpredictable perturbations?" Existing work only considers perturbations caused by variations in the HPC system delivered computational speeds. However, perturbations in available network bandwidth or latency are inevitable on production HPC systems. Simulator in the loop (SiL) is introduced, herein, as a new control-theoretic inspired approach to dynamically select DLS techniques that improve the performance of applications on heterogeneous HPC systems under perturbations. The present work examines the performance of six applications on a heterogeneous system under all above system perturbations. The SiL proof of concept is evaluated using simulation. The performance results confirm the initial hypothesis that no single DLS technique can deliver best performance in all scenarios, while the SiL-based DLS selection delivered improved application performance in most experiments

Experimental Verification and Analysis of Dynamic Loop Scheduling in Scientific Applications

Scientific applications are often irregular and characterized by large computationally-intensive parallel loops. Dynamic loop scheduling (DLS) techniques improve the performance of computationally-intensive scientific applications via load balancing of their execution on high-performance computing (HPC) systems. Identifying the most suitable choices of data distribution strategies, system sizes, and DLS techniques which improve the performance of a given application, requires intensive assessment and a large number of exploratory native experiments (using real applications on real systems), which may not always be feasible or practical due to associated time and costs. In such cases, simulative experiments are more appropriate for studying the performance of applications. This motivates the question of ‘How realistic are the simulations of executions of scientific applications using DLS on HPC platforms?’ In the present work, a methodology is devised to answer this question. It involves the experimental verification and analysis of the performance of DLS in scientific applications. The proposed methodology is employed for a computer vision application executing using four DLS techniques on two different HPC platforms, both via native and simulative experiments. The evaluation and analysis of the native and simulative results indicate that the accuracy of the simulative experiments is strongly influenced by the approach used to extract the computational effort of the application (FLOP- or time-based), the choice of application model representation into simulation (data or task parallel), and the available HPC subsystem models in the simulator (multi-core CPUs, memory hierarchy, and network topology). The minimum and the maximum percent errors achieved between the native and the simulative experiments are 0.95% and 8.03%, respectively

Experimental Verification and Analysis of Dynamic Loop Scheduling in Scientific Applications

Scientific applications are often irregular and characterized by large computationally-intensive parallel loops. Dynamic loop scheduling (DLS) techniques improve the performance of computationally-intensive scientific applications via load balancing of their execution on high-performance computing (HPC) systems. Identifying the most suitable choices of data distribution strategies, system sizes, and DLS techniques which improve the performance of a given application, requires intensive assessment and a large number of exploratory native experiments (using real applications on real systems), which may not always be feasible or practical due to associated time and costs. In such cases, simulative experiments are more appropriate for studying the performance of applications. This motivates the question of How realistic are the simulations of executions of scientific applications using DLS on HPC platforms? In the present work, a methodology is devised to answer this question. It involves the experimental verification and analysis of the performance of DLS in scientific applications. The proposed methodology is employed for a computer vision application executing using four DLS techniques on two different HPC plat- forms, both via native and simulative experiments. The evaluation and analysis of the native and simulative results indicate that the accuracy of the simulative experiments is strongly influenced by the approach used to extract the computational effort of the application (FLOP- or time-based), the choice of application model representation into simulation (data or task parallel), and the available HPC subsystem models in the simulator (multi-core CPUs, memory hierarchy, and network topology). The minimum and the maximum percent errors achieved between the native and the simulative experiments are 0.95% and 8.03%, respectively