3,747 research outputs found
Advanced Cyberinfrastructure for Science, Engineering, and Public Policy
Progress in many domains increasingly benefits from our ability to view the
systems through a computational lens, i.e., using computational abstractions of
the domains; and our ability to acquire, share, integrate, and analyze
disparate types of data. These advances would not be possible without the
advanced data and computational cyberinfrastructure and tools for data capture,
integration, analysis, modeling, and simulation. However, despite, and perhaps
because of, advances in "big data" technologies for data acquisition,
management and analytics, the other largely manual, and labor-intensive aspects
of the decision making process, e.g., formulating questions, designing studies,
organizing, curating, connecting, correlating and integrating crossdomain data,
drawing inferences and interpreting results, have become the rate-limiting
steps to progress. Advancing the capability and capacity for evidence-based
improvements in science, engineering, and public policy requires support for
(1) computational abstractions of the relevant domains coupled with
computational methods and tools for their analysis, synthesis, simulation,
visualization, sharing, and integration; (2) cognitive tools that leverage and
extend the reach of human intellect, and partner with humans on all aspects of
the activity; (3) nimble and trustworthy data cyber-infrastructures that
connect, manage a variety of instruments, multiple interrelated data types and
associated metadata, data representations, processes, protocols and workflows;
and enforce applicable security and data access and use policies; and (4)
organizational and social structures and processes for collaborative and
coordinated activity across disciplinary and institutional boundaries.Comment: A Computing Community Consortium (CCC) white paper, 9 pages. arXiv
admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1604.0200
A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities
Examines the state of the foundation's efforts to improve educational opportunities worldwide through universal access to and use of high-quality academic content
The evolution of bits and bottlenecks in a scientific workflow trying to keep up with technology: Accelerating 4D image segmentation applied to nasa data
In 2016, a team of earth scientists directly engaged a team of computer scientists to identify cyberinfrastructure (CI) approaches that would speed up an earth science workflow. This paper describes the evolution of that workflow as the two teams bridged CI and an image segmentation algorithm to do large scale earth science research. The Pacific Research Platform (PRP) and The Cognitive Hardware and Software Ecosystem Community Infrastructure (CHASE-CI) resources were used to significantly decreased the earth science workflow's wall-clock time from 19.5 days to 53 minutes. The improvement in wall-clock time comes from the use of network appliances, improved image segmentation, deployment of a containerized workflow, and the increase in CI experience and training for the earth scientists. This paper presents a description of the evolving innovations used to improve the workflow, bottlenecks identified within each workflow version, and improvements made within each version of the workflow, over a three-year time period
Libraries and the management of research data
A discussion of the role of university libraries in the management of digital research data outputs. Reviews some of the recent history of progress in this area from a UK perspective, with reference to international developments
Recommended from our members
Coordinative Entities: Forms of Organizing in Data Intensive Science
Scientific collaboration is a long-standing subject of CSCW scholarship that typically focuses on the development and use of computing systems to facilitate research. The research presented in this article investigates the sociality of science by identifying and describing particular, common forms of organizing that researchers in four different scientific realms employ to conduct work in both local contexts and as part of distributed, global projects. This paper introduces five prototypical forms of organizing we categorize as coordinative entities: the Principal Group, Intermittent Exchange, Sustained Aggregation, Federation, and Facility Organization. Coordinative entities as a categorization help specify, articulate, compare, and trace overlapping and evolving arrangements scientists use to facilitate data intensive research. We use this typology to unpack complexities of data intensive scientific collaboration in four cases, showing how scientists invoke different coordinative entities across three types of research activities: data collection, processing, and analysis. Our contribution scrutinizes the sociality of scientific work to illustrate how these actors engage in relational work within and among diverse, dispersed forms of organizing across project, funding, and disciplinary boundaries
Recommended from our members
Rethinking the scholar: openness, digital technology and changing practices
This paper discussed the current landscape of science publication and the route from analogue to digital scholarship (Borgman, 2007; Holliman et al., 2009; Weller, 2011)
- …