A Comparison of System Optimal and User Optimal Route Guidance.

The work described in this paper (carried out under the EC `DRIVE' programme) extends the simulations described in Working Paper 315, with the aim of studying the likely benefits to and reactions of drivers to system optimal (SO) route guidance - in particular, these effects are compared with those obtained under user optimal (UE) guidance. The model used is again one of a multiple user class equilibrium assignment, so that equipped drivers may be directed to more than one route per origin-destination movement. UE and SO guidance are compared, at different levels of equipped vehicles and demand levels, on the basis of the number of routes they recommend and the similarity of the flows on these routes, as well as link-based properties such as actual flows and queues resulting. These serve to demonstrate the extent to which the routes recommended under UE guidance serve as proxies to those under SO guidance. Secondly, a comparison is made of average (dis)benefits to guided drivers as well as the excess travel time incurred by individual equipped drivers in following SO, as opposed to UE guidance, in order to determine the extent of user sub-optimality of SO routing. Thirdly, input from a parallel DRIVE project, investigating user reactions to guidance information, is used to infer the extent to which drivers are likely to accept the sub-optimality of SO guidance, and the factors which are likely to influence their acceptance. Finally, some preliminary analysis is performed on combined strategies, which aim to strike a balance between the system benefits of SO guidance and the user benefits of UE routing

A Comparison of System Optimal and User Optimal Route Guidance.

The work described in this paper (carried out under the EC `DRIVE' programme) extends the simulations described in Working Paper 315, with the aim of studying the likely benefits to and reactions of drivers to system optimal (SO) route guidance - in particular, these effects are compared with those obtained under user optimal (UE) guidance. The model used is again one of a multiple user class equilibrium assignment, so that equipped drivers may be directed to more than one route per origin-destination movement. UE and SO guidance are compared, at different levels of equipped vehicles and demand levels, on the basis of the number of routes they recommend and the similarity of the flows on these routes, as well as link-based properties such as actual flows and queues resulting. These serve to demonstrate the extent to which the routes recommended under UE guidance serve as proxies to those under SO guidance. Secondly, a comparison is made of average (dis)benefits to guided drivers as well as the excess travel time incurred by individual equipped drivers in following SO, as opposed to UE guidance, in order to determine the extent of user sub-optimality of SO routing. Thirdly, input from a parallel DRIVE project, investigating user reactions to guidance information, is used to infer the extent to which drivers are likely to accept the sub-optimality of SO guidance, and the factors which are likely to influence their acceptance. Finally, some preliminary analysis is performed on combined strategies, which aim to strike a balance between the system benefits of SO guidance and the user benefits of UE routing

Towards a Testbed for Dynamic Vehicle Routing Algorithms

Since modern transport services are becoming more flexible, demand-responsive, and energy/cost efficient, there is a growing demand for large-scale microscopic simulation platforms in order to test sophisticated routing algorithms. Such platforms have to simulate in detail, not only the dynamically changing demand and supply of the relevant service, but also traffic flow and other relevant transport services. This paper presents the DVRP extension to the open-source MATSim simulator. The extension is designed to be highly general and customizable to simulate a wide range of dynamic rich vehicle routing problems. The extension allows plugging in of various algorithms that are responsible for continuous re-optimisation of routes in response to changes in the system. The DVRP extension has been used in many research and commercial projects dealing with simulation of electric and autonomous taxis, demand-responsive transport, personal rapid transport, free-floating car sharing and parking search

Study on QoS support in 802.11e-based multi-hop vehicular wireless ad hoc networks

Multimedia communications over vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET) will play an important role in the future intelligent transport system (ITS). QoS support for VANET therefore becomes an essential problem. In this paper, we first study the QoS performance in multi-hop VANET by using the standard IEEE 802.11e EDCA MAC and our proposed triple-constraint QoS routing protocol, Delay-Reliability-Hop (DeReHQ). In particular, we evaluate the DeReHQ protocol together with EDCA in highway and urban areas. Simulation results show that end-to-end delay performance can sometimes be achieved when both 802.11e EDCA and DeReHQ extended AODV are used. However, further studies on cross-layer optimization for QoS support in multi-hop environment are required

iTETRIS: An Integrated Wireless and Traffic Platform for Real-Time Road Traffic Management Solutions

Wireless vehicular cooperative systems have been identified as an attractive solution to improve road traffic management, thereby contributing to the European goal of safer, cleaner, and more efficient and sustainable traffic solutions. V2V-V2I communication technologies can improve traffic management through real-time exchange of data among vehicles and with road infrastructure. It is also of great importance to investigate the adequate combination of V2V and V2I technologies to ensure the continuous and costefficient operation of traffic management solutions based on wireless vehicular cooperative solutions. However, to adequately design and optimize these communication protocols and analyze the potential of wireless vehicular cooperative systems to improve road traffic management, adequate testbeds and field operational tests need to be conducted. Despite the potential of Field Operational Tests to get the first insights into the benefits and problems faced in the development of wireless vehicular cooperative systems, there is yet the need to evaluate in the long term and large dimension the true potential benefits of wireless vehicular cooperative systems to improve traffic efficiency. To this aim, iTETRIS is devoted to the development of advanced tools coupling traffic and wireless communication simulators