4 research outputs found

    Drug-Drug Interaction Extraction via Recurrent Hybrid Convolutional Neural Networks with an Improved Focal Loss

    Get PDF
    Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may bring huge health risks and dangerous effects to a patientโ€™s body when taking two or more drugs at the same time or within a certain period of time. Therefore, the automatic extraction of unknown DDIs has great potential for the development of pharmaceutical agents and the safety of drug use. In this article, we propose a novel recurrent hybrid convolutional neural network (RHCNN) for DDI extraction from biomedical literature. In the embedding layer, the texts mentioning two entities are represented as a sequence of semantic embeddings and position embeddings. In particular, the complete semantic embedding is obtained by the information fusion between a word embedding and its contextual information which is learnt by recurrent structure. After that, the hybrid convolutional neural network is employed to learn the sentence-level features which consist of the local context features from consecutive words and the dependency features between separated words for DDI extraction. Lastly but most significantly, in order to make up for the defects of the traditional cross-entropy loss function when dealing with class imbalanced data, we apply an improved focal loss function to mitigate against this problem when using the DDIExtraction 2013 dataset. In our experiments, we achieve DDI automatic extraction with a micro F-score of 75.48% on the DDIExtraction 2013 dataset, outperforming the state-of-the-art approach by 2.49

    ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๊ฐ์‹œ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋น„์ •ํ˜• ํ…์ŠคํŠธ ๋‚ด ์ž„์ƒ ์ •๋ณด ์ถ”์ถœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์‘์šฉ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2023. 2. ์ดํ˜•๊ธฐ.Pharmacovigilance is a scientific activity to detect, evaluate and understand the occurrence of adverse drug events or other problems related to drug safety. However, concerns have been raised over the quality of drug safety information for pharmacovigilance, and there is also a need to secure a new data source to acquire drug safety information. On the other hand, the rise of pre-trained language models based on a transformer architecture has accelerated the application of natural language processing (NLP) techniques in diverse domains. In this context, I tried to define two problems in pharmacovigilance as an NLP task and provide baseline models for the defined tasks: 1) extracting comprehensive drug safety information from adverse drug events narratives reported through a spontaneous reporting system (SRS) and 2) extracting drug-food interaction information from abstracts of biomedical articles. I developed annotation guidelines and performed manual annotation, demonstrating that strong NLP models can be trained to extracted clinical information from unstructrued free-texts by fine-tuning transformer-based language models on a high-quality annotated corpus. Finally, I discuss issues to consider when when developing annotation guidelines for extracting clinical information related to pharmacovigilance. The annotated corpora and the NLP models in this dissertation can streamline pharmacovigilance activities by enhancing the data quality of reported drug safety information and expanding the data sources.์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๊ฐ์‹œ๋Š” ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ ๋˜๋Š” ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์„ ๊ฐ์ง€, ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ณผํ•™์  ํ™œ๋™์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๊ฐ์‹œ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์˜์•ฝํ’ˆ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ์ •๋ณด์˜ ๋ณด๊ณ  ํ’ˆ์งˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์šฐ๋ ค๊ฐ€ ๊พธ์ค€ํžˆ ์ œ๊ธฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ณด๊ณ  ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ณดํ•  ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ž๋ฃŒ์›์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ ํŠธ๋žœ์Šคํฌ๋จธ ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์ „ํ›ˆ๋ จ ์–ธ์–ด๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ๋“ฑ์žฅํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋„๋ฉ”์ธ์—์„œ ์ž์—ฐ์–ด์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ ์šฉ์ด ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋งฅ๋ฝ์—์„œ ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๊ฐ์‹œ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์Œ 2๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ •๋ณด ์ถ”์ถœ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ž์—ฐ์–ด์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฌธ์ œ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ด€๋ จ ๊ธฐ์ค€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค: 1) ์ˆ˜๋™์  ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๊ฐ์‹œ ์ฒด๊ณ„์— ๋ณด๊ณ ๋œ ์ด์ƒ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์„œ์ˆ ์ž๋ฃŒ์—์„œ ํฌ๊ด„์ ์ธ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ๋‹ค. 2) ์˜๋ฌธ ์˜์•ฝํ•™ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก์—์„œ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ-์‹ํ’ˆ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ์ •๋ณด ์ถ”์ถœ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์–ด๋…ธํ…Œ์ด์…˜ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋ผ์ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์ž‘์—…์œผ๋กœ ์–ด๋…ธํ…Œ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์˜ ์ž์—ฐ์–ด ํ•™์Šต๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์ „ํ•™์Šต ์–ธ์–ด๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ์กฐ์ •ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋น„์ •ํ˜• ํ…์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ ์ž„์ƒ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ์ž์—ฐ์–ด์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์•ฝ๋ฌผ๊ฐ์‹œ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ์ž„์ƒ ์ •๋ณด ์ถ”์ถœ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์–ด๋…ธํ…Œ์ด์…˜ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋ผ์ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•  ๋•Œ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ์ฃผ์˜ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋…ผ์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•œ ์ž์—ฐ์–ด ํ•™์Šต๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ์ž์—ฐ์–ด์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ์ •๋ณด์˜ ๋ณด๊ณ  ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ์ž๋ฃŒ์›์„ ํ™•์žฅํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๊ฐ์‹œ ํ™œ๋™์„ ๋ณด์กฐํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.Chapter 1 1 1.1 Contributions of this dissertation 2 1.2 Overview of this dissertation 2 1.3 Other works 3 Chapter 2 4 2.1 Pharmacovigilance 4 2.2 Biomedical NLP for pharmacovigilance 6 2.2.1 Pre-trained language models 6 2.2.2 Corpora to extract clinical information for pharmacovigilance 9 Chapter 3 11 3.1 Motivation 12 3.2 Proposed Methods 14 3.2.1 Data source and text corpus 15 3.2.2 Annotation of ADE narratives 16 3.2.3 Quality control of annotation 17 3.2.4 Pretraining KAERS-BERT 18 3.2.6 Named entity recognition 20 3.2.7 Entity label classification and sentence extraction 21 3.2.8 Relation extraction 21 3.2.9 Model evaluation 22 3.2.10 Ablation experiment 23 3.3 Results 24 3.3.1 Annotated ICSRs 24 3.3.2 Corpus statistics 26 3.3.3 Performance of NLP models to extract drug safety information 28 3.3.4 Ablation experiment 31 3.4 Discussion 33 3.5 Conclusion 38 Chapter 4 39 4.1 Motivation 39 4.2 Proposed Methods 43 4.2.1 Data source 44 4.2.2 Annotation 45 4.2.3 Quality control of annotation 49 4.2.4 Baseline model development 49 4.3 Results 50 4.3.1 Corpus statistics 50 4.3.2 Annotation Quality 54 4.3.3 Performance of baseline models 55 4.3.4 Qualitative error analysis 56 4.4 Discussion 59 4.5 Conclusion 63 Chapter 5 64 5.1 Issues around defining a word entity 64 5.2 Issues around defining a relation between word entities 66 5.3 Issues around defining entity labels 68 5.4 Issues around selecting and preprocessing annotated documents 68 Chapter 6 71 6.1 Dissertation summary 71 6.2 Limitation and future works 72 6.2.1 Development of end-to-end information extraction models from free-texts to database based on existing structured information 72 6.2.2 Application of in-context learning framework in clinical information extraction 74 Chapter 7 76 7.1 Annotation Guideline for "Extraction of Comprehensive Drug Safety Information from Adverse Event Narratives Reported through Spontaneous Reporting System" 76 7.2 Annotation Guideline for "Extraction of Drug-Food Interactions from the Abtracts of Biomedical Articles" 100๋ฐ•
    corecore