An Exact Approach to Early/Tardy Scheduling with Release Dates

In this paper we consider the single machine earliness/tardiness scheduling problem with di?erent release dates and no unforced idle time. The problem is decomposed into a weighted earliness subproblem and a weighted tardiness subproblem. Lower bounding procedures are proposed for each of these subproblems, and the lower bound for the original problem is then simply the sum of the lower bounds for the two subproblems. The lower bounds and several versions of a branch-and-bound algorithm are then tested on a set of randomly generated problems, and instances with up to 30 jobs are solved to optimality. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first exact approach for the early/tardy scheduling problem with release dates and no unforced idle time.scheduling, early/tardy, release dates, lower bounds, branch-and-bound

Heuristics for the Early/Tardy Scheduling Problem with Release Dates

In this paper we consider the single machine earliness/tardiness scheduling problem with di?erent release dates and no unforced idle time. We analyse the performance of several dispatch rules, a greedy procedure and a decision theory local search heuristic. The dispatch rules use a lookahead parameter whose value must be specified. We perform some experiments to determine an appropriate value for this parameter. The use of dominance rules to improve the solutions obtained by these heuristics is also considered. The computational results show that the use of the dominance rules can indeed improve the solution quality with little additional computational e?ort. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of heuristic performance for the early/tardy scheduling problem with release dates and no unforced idle time.scheduling, early/tardy, release dates, heuristics

Improved Heuristics for the Early/Tardy Scheduling Problem with No Idle Time

In this paper we consider the single machine earliness/tardiness scheduling problem with no idle time. We present two new heuristics, a dispatch rule and a greedy procedure, and also consider the best of the existing dispatch rules. Both dispatch rules use a lookahead parameter that had previously been set at a fixed value. We develop functions that map some instance statistics into appropriate values for that parameter. We also consider the use of dominance rules to improve the solutions obtained by the heuristics. The computational results show that the function-based versions of the heuristics outperform their fixed value counterparts and that the use of the dominance rules can indeed improve solution quality with little additional computational effort.scheduling, early/tardy, heuristics, dispatch rules, dominance rules

Improved Lower Bounds for the Early/Tardy Scheduling Problem with No Idle Time

In this paper we consider the single machine earliness/tardiness scheduling problem with no idle time. Two of the lower bounds previously developed for this problem are based on lagrangean relaxation and the multiplier adjustment method, and require an initial sequence. We investigate the sensitivity of the lower bounds to the initial sequence, and experiment with di?erent dispatch rules and some dominance conditions. The computational results show that it is possible to obtain improved lower bounds by using a better initial sequence. The lower bounds are also incorporated in a branch-and-bound algorithm, and the computational tests show that one of the new lower bounds has the best performance for larger instances.scheduling, early/tardy, lower bound

Parallel machine scheduling with release dates, due dates and family setup times

In manufacturing, there is a fundamental conflict between efficient production and delivery performance. Maximizing machine utilization by batching similar jobs may lead to poor delivery performance. Minimizing customers' dissatisfaction may lead to an inefficient use of the machines. In this paper, we consider the problem of scheduling n independent jobs with release dates, due dates, and family setup times on m parallel machines. The objective is to minimize the maximum lateness of any job. We present a branch-and-bound algorithm to solve this problem. This algorithm exploits the fact that an optimal schedule is contained in a specific subset of all feasible schedules. For lower bounding purposes, we see setup times as setup jobs with release dates, due dates and processing times. We present two lower bounds for the problem with setup jobs, one of which proceeds by allowing preemption

Beam search algorithms for the early/tardy scheduling problem with release dates

In this paper we consider the single machine earliness/tardiness scheduling problem with di?erent release dates and no unforced idle time. We present several heuristic algorithms based on the beam search technique. These algorithms include classical beam search procedures, with both priority and total cost evaluation functions, as well as the filtered and recovering variants. Both priority evaluation functions and problem-specific properties were considered for the filtering step used in the filtered and recovering beam search heuristics. Extensive preliminary tests were performed to determine appropriate values for the parameters used by each algorithm. The computational results show that the recovering beam search algorithms outperform their filtered counterparts in both solution quality and computational requirements, while the priority-based filtering procedure proves superior to the rules-based alternative. The beam search procedure with a total cost evaluation function provides very good results, but is computationally expensive and can therefore only be applied to small or medium size instances. The recovering algorithm is quite close in solution quality and is significantly faster, so it can be used to solve even large instances.scheduling, early/tardy, beam search, heuristics

A strong preemptive relaxation for weighted tardiness and earliness/tardiness problems on unrelated parallel machines

Research on due date oriented objectives in the parallel machine environment is at best scarce compared to objectives such as minimizing the makespan or the completion time related performance measures. Moreover, almost all existing work in this area is focused on the identical parallel machine environment. In this study, we leverage on our previous work on the single machine total weighted tardiness (TWT) and total weighted earliness/tardiness (TWET) problems and develop a new preemptive relaxation for the TWT and TWET problems on a bank of unrelated parallel machines. The key contribution of this paper is devising a computationally effective Benders decomposition algorithm for solving the preemptive relaxation formulated as a mixed integer linear program. The optimal solution of the preemptive relaxation provides a tight lower bound. Moreover, it offers a near-optimal partition of the jobs to the machines, and then we exploit recent advances in solving the non-preemptive single machine TWT and TWET problems for constructing non-preemptive solutions of high quality to the original problem. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach with instances up to 5 machines and 200 jobs

A strong preemptive relaxation for weighted tardiness and earliness/tardiness problems on unrelated parallel machines

Research on due date-oriented objectives in the parallel machine environment is at best scarce compared to objectives such as minimizing the makespan or the completion time-related performance measures. Moreover, almost all existing work in this area is focused on the identical parallel machine environment. In this study, we leverage on our previous work on the single machine total weighted tardiness (TWT) and total weighted earliness/tardiness (TWET) problems and develop a new preemptive relaxation for both problems on a bank of unrelated parallel machines. The key contribution of this paper is devising a computationally effective Benders decomposition algorithm to solve the preemptive relaxation formulated as a mixed-integer linear program. The optimal solution of the preemptive relaxation provides a tight lower bound. Moreover, it offers a near-optimal partition of the jobs to the machines. We then exploit recent advances in solving the nonpreemptive single-machine TWT and TWET problems for constructing nonpreemptive solutions of high quality to the original problem. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach with instances of up to five machines and 200 jobs

A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs

Author name used in this publication: C. T. NgAuthor name used in this publication: T. C. E. Cheng2007-2008 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalAccepted ManuscriptPublishe