The Features of Cardiovascular Papers and Impact on Citations

Introduction: The number of citations is a factor in evaluating the quality of scientific articles. The present study aims to examine the factors affecting the citation rate of cardiovascular articles. Methods: In this scientometrics study, the research population is all cardiovascular articles in 2014 in Web of Science (WoS), including a sample of 381 articles studied. Pearson correlation coefficient, Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, and Bonferroni tests were used to examine the impact of article features on citations. Results: The results indicated that all quantitative variables (title length, number of authors, author's H-index, journal IF, number of pages, number of author's keywords, number of keywords-plus, number of references)had a significant relationship with the number of citations (P-value<0.001), except for the number of article keywords.  All of the qualitative variables (title length, number of authors, author's H-index, journal IF, number of pages, number of author's keywords, number of keywords-plus, number of references) also affect the number of citations (P-value<0.001). Open access articles, articles with the first author from Australia and North America, articles with international collaboration, and meta-analysis articles have received a more citation rate. Conclusion: Paying attention to the factors affecting the citation rate of cardiovascular articles can be of help to cardiovascular centers for policy-making and researchers in determining the research approach. In this way, they can improve the citation of their works

Open Access Publishing in Higher Education: Charting the Challenging Course to Academic and Financial Sustainability

The benefits, pitfalls, and sustainability of open access publishing are hotly debated. Commercial publishers dominate the marketplace and oppose alternative publishing models that threaten their bottom line. Scholars’ use of open access remains relatively limited due to awareness and perceived benefits to their professional goals. Readership of open access publications is generally strong, but some people disagree that more readers leads to increased citations and research impact. Libraries have grown their influence by supporting and promoting open access, but these efforts come with significant financial costs. Today, open access has flourished most significantly as a philosophy: the belief that the world’s scholarship should be freely available to readers and that publicly funded research, in particular, should be accessible to the taxpayers who paid for it. Transforming a moral good into a sustainable publishing model rests with lawmakers, scholars, and institutions of higher education. Without laws designed to ensure participation by authors and publishers, Green Open Access cannot effectively replace journal subscriptions. Scholars need to call upon each other to archive their work, utilize open access repository web sites to find quality content, and embrace Gold Open Access journals as a professionally beneficial publishing venue. Institutions must allocate additional internal resources to spur more and better institutional and disciplinary archives, new Gold Open Access journals, and myriad other professional, technical, and financial services necessary to promote open access as a fiscally and academically sustainable publishing solution