Performance Analysis and Modelling of Concurrent Multi-access Data Structures

The major impediment to scaling concurrent data structures is memory contention when accessing shared data structure access-points, leading to thread serialisation, hindering parallelism. Aiming to address this challenge, significant amount of work in the literature has proposed multi-access techniques that improve concurrent data structure parallelism. However, there is little work on analysing and modelling the execution behaviour of concurrent multi-access data structures especially in a shared memory setting. In this paper, we analyse and model the general execution behaviour of concurrent multi-access data structures in the shared memory setting. We study and analyse the behaviour of the two popular random access patterns: shared (Remote) and exclusive (Local) access, and the behaviour of the two most commonly used atomic primitives for designing lock-free data structures: Compare and Swap, and, Fetch and Add. We model the concurrent multi-accesses by splitting the thread execution procedure into five logical sessions: i) side-work, ii) access-point search iii) access-point acquisition, iv) access-point data acquisition and v) access-point data operation. We model the acquisition of an access-point, as a system of closed queuing networks with parallel servers, and data acquisition in terms of where the data is located within the memory system. We evaluate our model on a set of concurrent data structure designs including a counter, a stack and a FIFO queue. The evaluation is carried out on two state of the art multi-core processors: Intel Xeon Phi CPU 7290 with 72 physical cores and Intel Xeon E5-2695 with 14 physical cores. Our model is able to predict the throughput performance of the given concurrent data structures with 80% to 100% accuracy on both architectures

IST Austria Thesis

The scalability of concurrent data structures and distributed algorithms strongly depends on reducing the contention for shared resources and the costs of synchronization and communication. We show how such cost reductions can be attained by relaxing the strict consistency conditions required by sequential implementations. In the first part of the thesis, we consider relaxation in the context of concurrent data structures. Specifically, in data structures such as priority queues, imposing strong semantics renders scalability impossible, since a correct implementation of the remove operation should return only the element with highest priority. Intuitively, attempting to invoke remove operations concurrently creates a race condition. This bottleneck can be circumvented by relaxing semantics of the affected data structure, thus allowing removal of the elements which are no longer required to have the highest priority. We prove that the randomized implementations of relaxed data structures provide provable guarantees on the priority of the removed elements even under concurrency. Additionally, we show that in some cases the relaxed data structures can be used to scale the classical algorithms which are usually implemented with the exact ones. In the second part, we study parallel variants of the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm, which distribute computation among the multiple processors, thus reducing the running time. Unfortunately, in order for standard parallel SGD to succeed, each processor has to maintain a local copy of the necessary model parameter, which is identical to the local copies of other processors; the overheads from this perfect consistency in terms of communication and synchronization can negate the speedup gained by distributing the computation. We show that the consistency conditions required by SGD can be relaxed, allowing the algorithm to be more flexible in terms of tolerating quantized communication, asynchrony, or even crash faults, while its convergence remains asymptotically the same

The impact of load comparison errors on the power-of-d load balancing

We consider a system with unit-rate servers where jobs arrive according a Poisson process with rate ( 1∕we show that the stability region of the system reduces and the system performs poorly in comparison to the random scheme. Our mean-field analysis uses a new approach to characterise fixed points which neither have closed form solutions nor admit any recursion. Furthermore, we develop a generic approach to prove tightness and stability for any state-dependent load balancing scheme

Distributionally linearizable data structures

Relaxed concurrent data structures have become increasingly popular, due to their scalability in graph processing and machine learning applications (\citeNguyen13, gonzalez2012powergraph ). Despite considerable interest, there exist families of natural, high performing randomized relaxed concurrent data structures, such as the popular MultiQueue~\citeMQ pattern for implementing relaxed priority queue data structures, for which no guarantees are known in the concurrent setting~\citeAKLN17. Our main contribution is in showing for the first time that, under a set of analytic assumptions, a family of relaxed concurrent data structures, including variants of MultiQueues, but also a new approximate counting algorithm we call the MultiCounter, provides strong probabilistic guarantees on the degree of relaxation with respect to the sequential specification, in arbitrary concurrent executions. We formalize these guarantees via a new correctness condition called distributional linearizability, tailored to concurrent implementations with randomized relaxations. Our result is based on a new analysis of an asynchronous variant of the classic power-of-two-choices load balancing algorithm, in which placement choices can be based on inconsistent, outdated information (this result may be of independent interest). We validate our results empirically, showing that the MultiCounter algorithm can implement scalable relaxed timestamps