449 research outputs found

    Gestural Phasing as an Explanation for Vowel Devoicing in Turkish

    Get PDF
    Recent work in phonetics has suggested that vowel devoicing or schwa deletion, observed in various languages, is a gradient process. This study provides evidence for the previously undocumented process of high vowel devoicing in Turkish. The prosodic and segmental factors rate, stress, preceding environment, following environment, vowel type, and syllable type were investigated. The factors are described, evaluated and ranked according to the results of a multiple regression (Variable Rule) analysis. Where applicable, results are contrasted with findings for i.e., Japanese and Korean. Furthermore, VOT (voice onset time) measurements of the three voiceless stops [p t k] were obtained, as well as duration measurements of vowels in open and closed syllables where vowels are significantly longer in Turkish. Generally, most devoicing occurred when the vowel was shorter (i.e., as a result of faster rates of speech, lack of stress, in closed syllables, ect.). These findings accord well with predictions made by a model assuming gradual gestural overlap of adjacent consonantal and vocalic gestures. It will be attempted to explain the findings with differences in phasing between articulatory gestures

    On the social and linguistic implications of unstressed vowel weakening in cochabambino spanish

    Get PDF
    Resum: Sobre les implicacions socials i lingรผรญstiques del debilitament vocร lic en lโ€™espanyol de Cochabamba. Aquest article ofereix una anร lisi dels factors socials i lingรผรญstics que afecten el debilitament vocร lic de les vocals, fenomen existent en un dialecte poc estudiat dels Andes, lโ€™espanyol de Cochabamba. Aquest treball รฉs, a mรฉs, la primera anร lisi del dit debilitament en lโ€™espanyol, basat en dades compilades a partir dโ€™una tasca de lectura en veu alta

    When is a Syllable not a Syllable?

    Get PDF
    This paper reviews evidence for unifying two seemingly disparate types of syllable reduction phenomena: the elision of reduced vowels in English and German, and the devocalization of high vowels in Japanese, Korean, and Montreal French. Both types of "casual speech rule" can be understood as extreme endpoints of a phonetic continuum of gestural overlap. The vowel is seemingly deleted or devoiced when the gestures of neighboring consonants encroach so completely into the space for the affected vowel that the relevant vowel gesture(s) leave no salient acoustic trace. However, in some cases in some of these languages, the reduction has been phonologically reanalyzed, so that the word loses a syllable. The paper explores the circumstances under which such reanalysis can occur

    Syllables without vowels: Phonetic and phonological evidence from Tashlhiyt Berber

    Get PDF
    International audienceIt has been proposed that Tashlhiyt is a language which allows any segment,including obstruents, to be a syllable nucleus. The most striking and controversialexamples taken as arguments in favour of this analysis involve series of wordsclaimed to contain only obstruents. This claim is disputed in some recent work,where it is argued that these consonant sequences contain schwas that can besyllable nuclei. This article presents arguments showing that vowelless syllablesdo exist in Tashlhiyt, both at the phonetic and phonological levels. Acoustic,fibrescopic and photoelectroglottographic examination of voiceless words (e.g.[tkkststt]) provide evidence that such items lack syllabic vocalic elements. In addition,two types of phonological data, metrics and a spirantisation process, arepresented to show that in this language schwa is not a segment which can beindependently manipulated by phonological grammar and which can be referredto the syllable structure

    Mechanisms of vowel devoicing in Japanese

    Get PDF
    The processes of vowel devoicing in Standard Japanese were examined with respect to the phonetic and phonological environments and the syllable structure of Japanese, in comparison with vowel reduction processes in other languages, in most of which vowel reduction occurs optionally in fast or casual speech. This thesis examined whether Japanese vowel devoicing was a phonetic phenomenon caused by glottal assimilation between a high vowel and its adjacent voiceless consonants, or it was a more phonologically controlled compulsory process. Experimental results showed that Japanese high vowel devoicing must be analysed separately in two devoicing conditions, namely single and consecutive devoicing environments. Devoicing was almost compulsory regardless of the presence of proposed blocking factors such as type of preceding consonant, accentuation, position in an utterance, as long as there was no devoiceable vowel in adjacent morae (single devoicing condition). However, under consecutive devoicing conditions, blocking factors became effective and prevented some devoiceable vowels from becoming voiceless. The effect of speaking rate was also generally minimal in the single devoicing condition, but in the consecutive devoicing condition, the vowels were devoiced more at faster tempi than slower tempi, which created many examples of consecutively devoiced vowels over two morae. Durational observations found that vowel devoicing involves not only phonatory change, but also slight durational reduction. However, the shorter duration of devoiced syllables were adjusted at the word level, so that the whole duration of a word with devoiced vowels remained similar to the word without devoiced vowels, regardless of the number of devoiced vowels in the word. It must be noted that there was no clear-cut distinction between voiced and devoiced vowels, and the phonetic realisation of a devoiced vowel could vary from fully voiced to completely voiceless. A high vowel may be voiced in a typical devoicing environment, but its intensity is significantly weaker than those of vowels in a non-devoicing environment, at all speaking tempi. The mean differences of vowel intensities between these environments were generally higher at faster tempi. The results implied that even when the vowel was voiced, its production process moved in favour of devoicing. However, in consecutive devoicing conditions, this process did not always apply. When some of the devoiceable vowels were devoiced in the consecutive devoicing environment, the intensities of devoiceable vowels were not significantly lower than those of other vowels. The results of intensity measurements of voiced vowels in the devoicing and nondevoicing environments suggested that Japanese vowel devoicing was part of the overall process of complex vowel weakening, and that a completely devoiced vowel was the final state of the weakening process. Japanese vowel devoicing is primarily a process of glottal assimilation, but the results in the consecutive devoicing condition showed that this process was constrained by Japanese syllable structure

    Vowel Devoicing in Tokyo Japanese

    Get PDF
    This paper proposes a phonological analysis for vowel devoicing in Tokyo Japanese using the framework of Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky, 1993). Generally speaking, in Japanese the high vowels /i, u/ are devoiced when they occur between two voiceless consonants. However, there are some contexts where such a simple generalization does not hold, e.g., so called โ€œword-final devoicingโ€ and when devoiceable vowels are accented. This paper attempts to provide a unified analysis for such issues as well as for the canonical context

    ์ผ๋ณธ์–ด ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ์ ๊ทน ์ค‘์ฒฉ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์ธ๋ฌธ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์–ธ์–ดํ•™๊ณผ, 2023. 2. ์ „์ข…ํ˜ธ.๋ณธ๊ณ ๋Š” ์ผ๋ณธ์–ด ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”์˜ ๋ณ€์ด ์–‘์ƒ์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์Œ์šด๋ก ์ ์ธ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ํƒ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๋ž€, ๋ฌด์„ฑ ์ž์Œ ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ์ด ์œ ์„ฑ์„ฑ์„ ์žƒ๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์œผ๋กœ, ์ด๋Š” ์ข…์ข… ์Œ์„ฑํ•™์ ์ธ ํ˜„์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผ๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ์ปจ๋Œ€ Jun et al. (1998)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๋Š” ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ์„ ๋‘˜๋Ÿฌ์‹ผ ๋ฌด์„ฑ ์ž์Œ์˜ ์„ฑ๋ฌธ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ ๋™์ž‘์ด ๊ฒน์ณ์ง์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ์˜ ์œ ์„ฑ์„ฑ์ด ์‹คํ˜„๋˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ดํ•ด๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑํ•™์  ์„ค๋ช…์€ ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”์˜ ์‹คํ˜„์ด ์˜ค๋กœ์ง€ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์ž์Œ์˜ ์กฐ์Œ์  ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋Œ€์ƒ ๋ชจ์Œ๊ณผ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์ž์Œ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์  ๋ฐฐ์—ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋  ๊ฒƒ์ž„์„ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์„ค๋ช…์€ ์ผ๋ณธ์–ด ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ผ๋ณธ์–ด์˜ ์Œ์šด๋ก ์  ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ๋ฌด๊ด€ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ž„์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ธก๊ณผ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€๋กœ, ๋ณธ๊ณ ๋Š” ์ธ์ ‘ ์Œ์ ˆ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์ง€์‹์ด ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”์˜ ์‹คํ˜„์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ณธ์–ด ๋ฐœํ™” ์ฝ”ํผ์Šค(Corpus of Spontaneous Japanese; Maekawa et al. 2000)์—์„œ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ, ๋ณธ๊ณ ๋Š” ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”์˜ ๋นˆ๋„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์Œ์šด๋ก ์  ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋ฐํ˜€๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. (i) ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๋Š” ๋งˆ์ฐฐ์Œ์ด๋‚˜ ํŒŒ์ฐฐ์Œ์ด ๋Œ€์ƒ ๋ชจ์Œ์— ์„ ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋งˆ์ฐฐ์Œ์ด ํ›„ํ–‰ํ•  ๋•Œ ์ €์ง€๋œ๋‹ค.(์กฐ์Œ ์–‘์‹์˜ ์ผ์น˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด) (ii) ์กฐ์Œ ์–‘์‹์˜ ์ผ์น˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด ํ•˜์—์„œ, ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๋Š” ๋Œ€์ƒ ๋ชจ์Œ์— ํ›„ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์Œ์ ˆ์ด ๋˜๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•  ๋•Œ ๋”์šฑ ๋” ์ €์ง€๋œ๋‹ค.(๋ชจ์Œ ๋†’์ด์˜ ์ผ์น˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด) (iii) ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๋Š” ๋Œ€์ƒ ๋ชจ์Œ์ด ์•ก์„ผํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ง€๋‹ ๋•Œ ๋œ ์ผ์–ด๋‚œ๋‹ค. (iv) ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๋Š” ์ค‘์ž์Œ์ด ๋Œ€์ƒ ๋ชจ์Œ์— ํ›„ํ–‰ํ•  ๋•Œ ๋œ ์ผ์–ด๋‚œ๋‹ค. (v) ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ด ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ผ์–ด๋‚˜๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ, ์ธ์ ‘ ์Œ์ ˆ์˜ ๋‘ ๋ชจ์Œ์ด ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ํšŒํ”ผ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ๊ณ ๋Š” ์œ„์˜ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ๋“ค์„ ์ตœ์ ์„ฑ์ด๋ก (Optimality Theory; Prince and Smolensky 1993/2004)์— ์ž…๊ฐํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜•์‹์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ๋ณธ๊ณ ๋Š” ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€์ด์Œ์  ๊ต์ฒด๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•ด๋‚ด๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ œ์•ฝ์˜ ์œ„๊ณ„(ranking)์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋„์ถœ๋œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ฃผ์žฅํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ์ด๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์˜์กด์  ์œ ํ‘œ์„ฑ(context-sensitive markedness) ์ œ์•ฝ (DEVOICE: ๋ฌด์„ฑ ์ž์Œ ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ์งง์€ ์œ ์„ฑ ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ์„ ๊ธˆํ•จ) >> ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋…๋ฆฝ์  ์œ ํ‘œ์„ฑ(context-free markedness) ์ œ์•ฝ(SONVOI: ๋ฌด์„ฑ ๊ณต๋ช…์Œ์„ ๊ธˆํ•จ) >> ์ถฉ์‹ค์„ฑ(faithfulness) ์ œ์•ฝ(IO-ID(vce): ์ž…๋ ฅํ˜•์˜ [์œ ์„ฑ์„ฑ]([voice]) ๊ฐ’์„ ์ถœ๋ ฅํ˜•์—์„œ ๋ฐ”๊พธ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ธˆํ•จ)์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ, ์—ฐ์† ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๊ฐ€ ํšŒํ”ผ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด OCP-Vฬฅ (์ธ์ ‘ ์Œ์ ˆ ๋‚ด์˜ ๋‘ ๋ฌด์„ฑ ๋ชจ์Œ์„ ๊ธˆํ•จ)์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์œ„์˜ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ ์ค‘, ์กฐ์Œ ์–‘์‹๊ณผ ๋ชจ์Œ ๋†’์ด์˜ ์ผ์น˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์€ ์Œ์ ˆ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ฐธ์กฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. V1์ด ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ด ๋˜๋Š” ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ์ด๊ณ  C1๊ณผ C2๊ฐ€ ๋ฌด์„ฑ ์ž์Œ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•  ๋•Œ, /C1V1C2V2/ ์—ฐ์†์€ ์ผ๋ณธ์–ด์—์„œ [C1V1]ฯƒ1[C2V2]ฯƒ2 ์˜ ๋‘ ์Œ์ ˆ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋‰œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ, ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๋Š” ์ธ์ ‘ ์Œ์ ˆ์˜ ๋‘์Œ(onset), ์ฆ‰ C1๊ณผ C2๊ฐ€ [+์ง€์†์„ฑ]([+continuant])๋กœ ์ผ์น˜ํ•  ๋•Œ ์ €์ง€๋œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ((์˜ˆ) suso ์˜ท์ž๋ฝ) ํŒŒ์ฐฐ์Œ์€ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ–‰๋™์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š”๋ฐ, ๋ชจ์Œ์— ์„ ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ(์ฆ‰, C1)์—์„œ๋Š” ๋งˆ์ฐฐ์Œ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ [+์ง€์†์„ฑ]๋กœ ํ–‰๋™ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ชจ์Œ์— ํ›„ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ(์ฆ‰, C2)์—์„œ๋Š” ํŒŒ์—ด์Œ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ [-์ง€์†์„ฑ]๋กœ ํ–‰๋™ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์กฐ์Œ ์–‘์‹์˜ ์ผ์น˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๋Š” ์ธ์ ‘ ์Œ์ ˆ์˜ ์Œ์ ˆํ•ต(nuclei), ์ฆ‰ V1๊ณผ V2์˜ [๊ณ ์„ค์„ฑ]([high]) ์ž์งˆ์ด ์ผ์น˜ํ•  ๋•Œ ๋”์šฑ ๋” ์ €์ง€๋œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์กฐ์Œ ์–‘์‹๊ณผ ๋ชจ์Œ ๋†’์ด ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ถ€๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ธ์ ‘ ์Œ์ ˆ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์œ ์‚ฌ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„์งˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™” ๋นˆ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ๊ณ ๋Š” ์œ„์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ €์ง€ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ธ์ ‘ํ•˜๊ณ  ์„œ๋กœ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ์Œ์ ˆ ๋‚ด์— ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ์Œ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์œ ์„ฑ์„ฑ ์ผ์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์กดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ผ์–ด๋‚œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ฃผ์žฅํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ฃผ์žฅ์„ ํ˜•์‹ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณธ๊ณ ๋Š” Zuraw(2002)์˜ ์ ๊ทน ์ค‘์ฒฉ(Aggressive Reduplication)์„ ์ฐจ์šฉํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. McCarthy and Prince(1995)์—์„œ ์–ด๊ธฐ์™€ ์ค‘์ฒฉ์–ด ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋™์ผ์„ฑ์ด ๋Œ€์‘(correspondence)์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ฃผ์žฅ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ, ์ ๊ทน ์ค‘์ฒฉ ์ด๋ก ์€ ๋‹จ์–ด ๋‚ด ํ•˜์œ„ ์—ฐ์‡„(substring)๊ฐ„์˜ ๋Œ€์‘์ด REDUP ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ œ์•ฝ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ถ€๊ณผ๋˜๊ณ , REDUP ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ด‰๋ฐœ๋œ ๋Œ€์‘ ์ œ์•ฝ๋“ค(ฮบฮบ-CORR)์ด ๋Œ€์‘ ์—ฐ์‡„ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์ด ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ง‰๋Š”๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ฃผ์žฅํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ฃผ์žฅ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ๋ณธ๊ณ ๋Š” ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ €์ง€ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ธ์ ‘ ์Œ์ ˆ ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์‘ ์ œ์•ฝ๋“ค์ด ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ผ์–ด๋‚ฌ์„ ๋•Œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์‘ ๋ชจ์Œ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์œ ์„ฑ์„ฑ ๋ถˆ์ผ์น˜๋ฅผ ๋น„์„ ํ˜ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ผ์–ด๋‚œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์„ค๋ช…ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€์„œ, ฮบฮบ-CORR ์ œ์•ฝ์ด REDUP ์ œ์•ฝ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ƒ์œ„์— ๋†“์ด๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด, ๋Œ€์‘ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ์ƒํ˜ธ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ์Œ์ ˆ์—๋งŒ ๋†“์ด๊ฒŒ ๋˜๊ณ , ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ๋งŒ ์ €์ง€๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•ด ๋‚ธ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ๊ณ ๋Š” ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์  ์ด๋ก ์ธ ์˜๋ฌด ๊ตด๊ณก ์›๋ฆฌ(Obligatory Contour Principle; McCarthy 1986)์™€ ๋Œ€์‘์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ผ์น˜ ์ด๋ก (Agreement by Correspondence; Rose and Walker 2004)์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๊ณ , ์˜ค๋กœ์ง€ ์ ๊ทน ์ค‘์ฒฉ ์ด๋ก ๋งŒ์ด ๋ถ„์ ˆ์Œ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ํฐ ๋‹จ์œ„์˜ ๋Œ€์‘์„ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ผ๋ณธ์–ด ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œํ™”์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ €์ง€ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ฃผ์žฅํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ๊ณ ๋Š” ๊ณ ์ € ์•ก์„ผํŠธ์™€ ์ค‘์ž์Œ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์ œ์•ฝ๋“ค ๋˜ํ•œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์•ก์„ผํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ง€๋‹Œ ์Œ์ ˆ์˜ ์‹ฌ๋ฆฌ์–ธ์–ดํ•™์ , ์ฒญ์ทจ์  ํ˜„์ €์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ, ์•ก์„ผํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ง€๋‹Œ ์Œ์ ˆ์ด ๋” ํฐ ์œ„์น˜์  ์ถฉ์‹ค์„ฑ(positional faithfulness; Beckman 1998)์„ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๋ฅผ ์ €์ง€ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ณด๊ณ , ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ„์น˜์  ์ถฉ์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ (IO-ID(vce)/ฯƒฬ(์•ก์„ผํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ง€๋‹Œ ์Œ์ ˆ ๋‚ด์˜ ์ž…๋ ฅํ˜• [์œ ์„ฑ์„ฑ] ๊ฐ’์„ ์ถœ๋ ฅํ˜•์—์„œ ๋ฐ”๊พธ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ธˆํ•จ)์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ค‘์ž์Œ์ด ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”๋ฅผ ์ €์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ผ๋ณธ์–ด์—์„œ ์ค‘์ž์Œ์— ์„ ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจ์Œ์ด ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ธธ์–ด์ง„๋‹ค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค(Kawahara 2015)๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ์ธํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ฃผ์žฅํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒญ์ทจ์  ์‚ฌ์ƒ ๊ฐ€์„ค(P-map hypothesis; Steriade 2001, 2009)์— ์ž…๊ฐํ•˜์—ฌ, ์œ ์„ฑ์„ฑ์˜ ์ฒญ์ทจ์  ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์งง์€ ๋ชจ์Œ๊ณผ ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์˜ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œ ์ง ์‚ฌ์ด๋ณด๋‹ค ์žฅ์Œํ™”๋œ ๋ชจ์Œ๊ณผ ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์˜ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œ ์ง ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ๋” ํด ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋˜๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์œ„์น˜์  ์ถฉ์‹ค์„ฑ ์ œ์•ฝ์ธ IO-ID(vce)/_GEM(์ค‘์ž์Œ์— ์„ ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจ์Œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด, ์ž…๋ ฅํ˜•์˜ [voice] ๊ฐ’์„ ์ถœ๋ ฅํ˜•์—์„œ ๋ฐ”๊พธ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ธˆํ•จ)์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๋ณ€์ด๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณธ๊ณ ๋Š” Anttila(1997)์˜ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์œ„๊ณ„ ์ด๋ก (Partially Ordered Constraints)์„ ์ฐจ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ์ž…๊ฐํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ œ์•ฝ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์œ„๊ณ„๋Š” ๊ณ ์ •๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ๋งค ์‚ฐ์ถœ ์‹œ๋งˆ๋‹ค ๋ฐ”๋€” ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ๊ณ ๋Š” ์Œ์ ˆ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์ง€์‹์ด ์ผ๋ณธ์–ด ๊ณ ๋ชจ์Œ ๋ฌด์„ฑ์Œํ™”์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ค€๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์— ์ด ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ์Œ์„ฑ์ ์ด๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์–ดํœ˜๋ถ€ ์™ธ์ (post-lexical)์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ฃผ์žฅ๊ณผ ์ƒ์ถฉ๋จ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ๊ณ ์˜ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€ ์ผ๋ณธ์–ด ํ™”์ž๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ์Œ์˜ ์œ ์„ฑ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ์ˆœ์ „ํžˆ ๋ณ€์ด์Œ์ ์ผ์ง€๋ผ๋„, ํ™”์ž๋“ค์ด ๋ชจ์Œ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์œ ์„ฑ์„ฑ์ด ์„œ๋กœ ๊ฐ™๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์‹์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.In this study, I investigate the phonological factors that contribute to the variable pattern of Japanese high vowel devoicing. High vowel devoicing, whereby high vowels lose voicing between voiceless consonants, has often been considered to be a phonetic process; it has been claimed that this process occurs because voicing of high vowels fails to be achieved due to an overlap of the glottal opening gestures of the surrounding voiceless consonants (Jun et al. 1998). Such an account assumes that the application of high vowel devoicing is solely conditioned by the articulatory characteristics of the surrounding consonants, and the temporal organization of the target vowel with the surrounding consonants. As such, it predicts that Japanese high vowel devoicing will be insensitive to the phonological structure of Japanese. Contrary to this prediction, the current study shows that the structural knowledge of similarity between adjacent syllables plays an important role in the application of high vowel devoicing. Using a large-scale dataset from a Japanese speech corpus (Corpus of Spontaneous Japanese; Maekawa et al. 2000), I report the following phonological tendencies that affect the rate of high vowel devoicing: (i) Devoicing is less likely if the target vowel is preceded by a fricative or affricate and followed by a fricative. (Matching manner condition) (ii) In the matching manner condition, devoicing is even less likely if the syllable following the target vowel contains another high vowel. (Matching height condition) (iii) Devoicing is less likely if the target vowel is accented. (iv) Devoicing is less likely if the target vowel is followed by a geminate. (v) In the environment where the devoicing context occurs consecutively, devoicing of two vowels in adjacent syllables tends to be avoided. I then provide a formal analysis of the observed tendencies within the framework of Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993/2004). First, I claim that devoicing is derived by a typical ranking of constraints for allophonic variation: Context-sensitive Markedness (DEVOICE: No voiced short high vowel between voiceless consonants) >> Context-free Markedness (SONVOI: No voiceless sonorant) >> Faithfulness (IO-ID(vce): No change of the input [voice] in the output). Additionally, I propose OCP-Vฬฅ (No voiceless vowels in adjacent syllables) to account for the tendency of consecutive devoicing to be avoided. The matching manner and matching height conditions among the tendencies above can be generalized by making reference to the syllable structure. /C1V1C2V2/ sequences, where V1 is a target high vowel and C1 and C2 are voiceless consonants, are parsed into [C1V1]ฯƒ1[C2V2]ฯƒ2 in Japanese. Given this, it can be said that devoicing is suppressed if the onsets of the adjacent syllables (i.e., C1 and C2) match in [+continuant] (e.g., suso hem). Affricates show a position-specific behavior, patterning with fricatives in prevocalic position (i.e., C1) as [+continuant], and with stops in postvocalic position (i.e., C2) as [โˆ’continuant]. In addition to the matching manner condition, devoicing is further suppressed if the height of the nuclei (i.e., V1 and V2) agrees in [high] (e.g., susi sushi). This additive effect of the matching height condition to the matching manner condition suggests that devoicing rates decrease as the degree of similarity between two adjacent syllables increases. I claim that these similarity-driven blocking effects arise due to an effort to preserve the voicing identity between the vowels in adjacent, self-similar syllables. To formalize this claim, I provide an analysis adopting Zuraws (2002) Aggressive Reduplication. As much as reduplicative identity is argued to be driven by correspondence between a base and reduplicant (McCarthy and Prince 1995), the Aggressive Reduplication account proposes that correspondence between word-internal substrings is imposed by the constraint REDUP, and correspondence constraints (ฮบฮบ-CORR) that are invoked by REDUP prevent any disruption of self-similarity between the correspondent strings. Under this account, the similarity-driven blocking effects are explained by the effects of correspondence constraints operating between adjacent syllables, which disprefer a mismatch of [voice] between the correspondent vowels when the target vowel devoices. In addition, the ranking of ฮบฮบ-CORR over REDUP derives the results where correspondence structure is only posited in self-similar syllables, and thus blocks devoicing only in those environments. I discuss alternative similarity-related theories such as the Obligatory Contour Principle (McCarthy 1986) and Agreement by Correspondence (Rose and Walker 2004), and argue that only Aggressive Reduplication successfully accounts for the similarity-driven effects in Japanese high vowel devoicing, since it allows correspondence beyond the segmental level. On top of the above constraints, I provide additional constraints for the effects of pitch accent and geminacy. Based on the psycholinguistic and perceptual salience of accented syllables, I claim that pitch accent impedes devoicing since accented syllables require greater positional faithfulness (IO-ID(vce)/ฯƒฬ; Do not change the input [voice] of an accented syllable in the output, following Beckman 1998). I further claim that the inhibitory effect of geminates is based on pre-geminate vowel lengthening in Japanese (Kawahara 2015). Based on the P-map hypothesis (Steriade 2001, 2009), I assume that the perceptual difference in voicing between a lengthened vowel and its voiceless counterpart is greater than that between a short vowel and its voiceless counterpart. As such, I propose another positional faithfulness constraint, IO-ID(vce)/_GEM, which bans a voicing change of a vowel before a geminate. Finally, to account for variation, I employ Anttilas (1997) Partially Ordered Constraints approach. Based on this, I assume some parts of the constraint ranking are fixed, while others can change at each production. The current study finds that structural knowledge such as similarity relations across syllables plays a crucial role in Japanese high vowel devoicing, which has often been treated as a phonetic or post-lexical process. This suggests that Japanese speakers are sensitive to the (dis)similarity of vowel voicing, even when this information is purely allophonic.1. Introduction 1 2. Data 7 2.1. Corpus 7 2.2. Phonological tendencies 13 2.2.1. C1 and C2 manner 13 2.2.2. V2 height 17 2.2.3. Pitch accent 20 2.2.4. Geminacy of C2 21 2.2.5. Morpheme boundary 22 2.2.6. Consecutive devoicing environment 24 2.2.7. Statistical analysis 25 3. Analysis 29 3.1. Basic mechanism of high vowel devoicing 30 3.2. Aggressive Reduplication 35 3.3. Accent and geminacy 52 3.4. Calculating ranking probabilities 55 4. Potential alternatives 63 4.1. OCP 63 4.2. ABC 67 5. Conclusion 72 References 76 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก 87์„

    Korean laryngeal contrast revisited:An electroglottographic study on denasalized and oral stops

    Get PDF
    In several Korean dialects, domain-initial nasal onsets undergo denasalization as a recent sound change. Nasal stops may be realized as prevoiced or even devoiced stops. This makes it necessary to examine the interplay of phonetic properties of the denasalized and the three oral stop series as a whole, in synchrony and diachrony. What are their concomitant and conflicting properties? Our study provides a bigger picture of the laryngeal contrast in Seoul and Gyeonggi Korean by examining the acoustic distributions related to the laryngeal properties of the four stop series, using acoustic and electroglottographic data. VOT and 'f'0 play important roles in the distinction of the four stop series, in line with previous studies. While the contribution of voice quality is relatively minor, we show that it plays an essential role of disambiguation when the VOTโ€“'f'0 space gets crowded: When lenis stops can be confused with other stops, there is an enhancement of breathy voice. Finally, we discuss stop variation according to prosodic contexts. We highlight the basis of both syntagmatic variation and paradigmatic contrast in their phonetic implementations. They illustrate a constant reorganization to reconcile contrast maintenance with constraints from articulatory and perceptual systems, as well as language-specific structures

    Sampling the progression of domain-initial denasalization in Seoul Korean

    Get PDF
    Word-initial nasals in Korean are known to exhibit prosody-sensitive denasalization. The literature on the subject is still scarce and even the basic description of the process is debated. This study tested the speculation that inconsistencies in the literature may be explained if certain features of denasalization have developed relatively recently as part of an ongoing sound change. Based on apparent-time data from thirty-two speakers of Seoul Korean, the study explored the development of denasalization over a fifty-year period. The phonetic manifestations of domain-initial nasals were examined, along with the effects of prosodic position, place of articulation, and the height of the following vowel. The results revealed that denasalization has advanced rapidly over time, acquiring more plosive-like features of devoicing as well as a complete lack of nasality. Alveolar nasals before a high vowel were most likely to show denasalization and devoicing. Interestingly, the cumulative effect of prosody became weakest and partial denasalization was least likely for the younger group. Based on these results, we speculate that Korean denasalization is in the process of being stabilized into a discrete phrase-level process from a more general, gradient phenomenon of domain-initial strengthening, consistent with the theory of the life cycle of phonological processes. Keywords: denasalization; domain-initial strengthening; articulatory strengthening; fortition; Korean; sound change; rule scattering; life cycle of phonological processes; apparent tim

    Transphonologization of voicing in Chru:Studies in production and perception

    Get PDF
    Chru, a Chamic language of south-central Vietnam, has been described as combining contrastive obstruent voicing with incipient registral properties (Fuller, 1977). A production study reveals that obstruent voicing has already become optional and that the voicing contrast has been transphonologized into a register contrast based primarily on vowel height (F1). An identification study shows that perception roughly matches production in that F1 is the main perceptual cue associated with the contrast. Structured variation in production suggests a sound change still in progress: While younger speakers largely rely on vowel height to produce the register contrast, older male speakers maintain a variety of secondary properties, including optional closure voicing. Our results shed light on the initial stages of register formation and challenge the claim that register languages must go through a stage in which breathiness or aspiration is the primary contrastive property (Haudricourt, 1965; Wayland & Jongman, 2002; Thurgood, 2002). This article also complements several recent studies about the transphonologization of voicing in typologically diverse languages (Svantesson & House, 2006; Howe, 2017; Coetzee, Beddor, Shedden, Styler, & Wissing, 2018)
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore