258 research outputs found

    Multiagent Systems for Network Intrusion Detection: A Review

    Get PDF
    More and more, Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) are seen as an important component in comprehensive security solutions. Thus, IDSs are common elements in modern infrastructures to enforce network policies. So far, plenty of techniques have been applied for the detection of intrusions, which has been reported in many surveys. This work focuses the development of network-based IDSs from an architectural point of view, in which multiagent systems are applied for the development of IDSs, presenting an up-to-date revision of the state of the art

    Feature selection and visualization techniques for network anomaly detector

    Get PDF
    Intrusion detection systems have been widely used as burglar alarms in the computer security field. There are two major types of detection techniques: misuse detection and anomaly detection. Although misuse detection can detect known attacks with lower false positive rate, anomaly detection is capable of detecting any new or varied attempted intrusion as long as the attempted intrusions disturb the normal states of the systems. The network anomaly detector is employed to monitor a segment of network for any suspicious activities based on the sniffered network traffic. The fast speed of network and wide use of encryption techniques make it almost unpractical to read payload information for the network anomaly detector. This work tries to answer the question: What are the best features for network anomaly detector? The main experiment data sets are from 1999 DARPA Lincoln Library off-line intrusion evaluation project since it is still the most comprehensive public benchmark data up to today. Firstly, 43 features of different levels and protocols are defined. Using the first three weeks as training data and last two weeks as testing data, the performance of the features are testified by using 5 different classifiers. Secondly, the feasibility of feature selection is investigated by employing some filter and wrapper techniques such as Correlation Feature Selection, etc. Thirdly, the effect of changing overlap and time window for the network anomaly detector is investigated. At last, GGobi and Mineset are utilized to visualize intrusion detections to save time and effort for system administrators. The results show the capability of our features is not limited to probing attacks and denial of service attacks. They can also detect remote to local attacks and backdoors. The feature selection techniques successfully reduce the dimensionality of the features from 43 to 10 without performance degrading. The three dimensional visualization pictures provide a straightforward view of normal network traffic and malicious attacks. The time plot of key features can be used to aid system administrators to quickly locate the possible intrusions

    State of the art of cyber-physical systems security: An automatic control perspective

    Get PDF
    Cyber-physical systems are integrations of computation, networking, and physical processes. Due to the tight cyber-physical coupling and to the potentially disrupting consequences of failures, security here is one of the primary concerns. Our systematic mapping study sheds light on how security is actually addressed when dealing with cyber-physical systems from an automatic control perspective. The provided map of 138 selected studies is defined empirically and is based on, for instance, application fields, various system components, related algorithms and models, attacks characteristics and defense strategies. It presents a powerful comparison framework for existing and future research on this hot topic, important for both industry and academia

    Surveying port scans and their detection methodologies

    Get PDF
    Scanning of ports on a computer occurs frequently on the Internet. An attacker performs port scans of IP addresses to find vulnerable hosts to compromise. However, it is also useful for system administrators and other network defenders to detect port scans as possible preliminaries to more serious attacks. It is a very difficult task to recognize instances of malicious port scanning. In general, a port scan may be an instance of a scan by attackers or an instance of a scan by network defenders. In this survey, we present research and development trends in this area. Our presentation includes a discussion of common port scan attacks. We provide a comparison of port scan methods based on type, mode of detection, mechanism used for detection, and other characteristics. This survey also reports on the available datasets and evaluation criteria for port scan detection approaches

    Statistical anomaly denial of service and reconnaissance intrusion detection

    Get PDF
    This dissertation presents the architecture, methods and results of the Hierarchical Intrusion Detection Engine (HIDE) and the Reconnaissance Intrusion Detection System (RIDS); the former is denial-of-service (DoS) attack detector while the latter is a scan and probe (P&S) reconnaissance detector; both are statistical anomaly systems. The HIDE is a packet-oriented, observation-window using, hierarchical, multi-tier, anomaly based network intrusion detection system, which monitors several network traffic parameters simultaneously, constructs a 64-bin probability density function (PDF) for each, statistically compares it to a reference PDF of normal behavior using a similarity metric, then combines the results into an anomaly status vector that is classified by a neural network classifier. Three different data sets have been utilized to test the performance of HIDE; they are OPNET simulation data, DARPA\u2798 intrusion detection evaluation data and the CONEX TESTBED attack data. The results showed that HIDE can reliably detect DoS attacks with high accuracy and very low false alarm rates on all data sets. In particular, the investigation using the DARPA\u2798 data set yielded an overall total misclassification rate of 0.13%, false negative rate of 1.42%, and false positive rate of 0.090%; the latter implies a rate of only about 2.6 false alarms per day. The RIDS is a session oriented, statistical tool, that relies on training to model the parameters of its algorithms, capable of detecting even distributed stealthy reconnaissance attacks. It consists of two main functional modules or stages: the Reconnaissance Activity Profiler (RAP) and the Reconnaissance Alert Correlater (RAC). The RAP is a session-oriented module capable of detecting stealthy scanning and probing attacks, while the RAG is an alert-correlation module that fuses the RAP alerts into attack scenarios and discovers the distributed stealthy attack scenarios. RIDS has been evaluated against two data sets: (a) the DARPA\u2798 data, and (b) 3 weeks of experimental data generated using the CONEX TESTBED network. The RIDS has demonstrably achieved remarkable success; the false positive, false negative and misclassification rates found are low, less than 0.1%, for most reconnaissance attacks; they rise to about 6% for distributed highly stealthy attacks; the latter is a most challenging type of attack, which has been difficult to detect effectively until now

    Three Decades of Deception Techniques in Active Cyber Defense -- Retrospect and Outlook

    Full text link
    Deception techniques have been widely seen as a game changer in cyber defense. In this paper, we review representative techniques in honeypots, honeytokens, and moving target defense, spanning from the late 1980s to the year 2021. Techniques from these three domains complement with each other and may be leveraged to build a holistic deception based defense. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has not been a work that provides a systematic retrospect of these three domains all together and investigates their integrated usage for orchestrated deceptions. Our paper aims to fill this gap. By utilizing a tailored cyber kill chain model which can reflect the current threat landscape and a four-layer deception stack, a two-dimensional taxonomy is developed, based on which the deception techniques are classified. The taxonomy literally answers which phases of a cyber attack campaign the techniques can disrupt and which layers of the deception stack they belong to. Cyber defenders may use the taxonomy as a reference to design an organized and comprehensive deception plan, or to prioritize deception efforts for a budget conscious solution. We also discuss two important points for achieving active and resilient cyber defense, namely deception in depth and deception lifecycle, where several notable proposals are illustrated. Finally, some outlooks on future research directions are presented, including dynamic integration of different deception techniques, quantified deception effects and deception operation cost, hardware-supported deception techniques, as well as techniques developed based on better understanding of the human element.Comment: 19 page
    corecore