44 research outputs found

    Distributed Exact Shortest Paths in Sublinear Time

    Full text link
    The distributed single-source shortest paths problem is one of the most fundamental and central problems in the message-passing distributed computing. Classical Bellman-Ford algorithm solves it in O(n)O(n) time, where nn is the number of vertices in the input graph GG. Peleg and Rubinovich (FOCS'99) showed a lower bound of Ω~(D+n)\tilde{\Omega}(D + \sqrt{n}) for this problem, where DD is the hop-diameter of GG. Whether or not this problem can be solved in o(n)o(n) time when DD is relatively small is a major notorious open question. Despite intensive research \cite{LP13,N14,HKN15,EN16,BKKL16} that yielded near-optimal algorithms for the approximate variant of this problem, no progress was reported for the original problem. In this paper we answer this question in the affirmative. We devise an algorithm that requires O((nlogn)5/6)O((n \log n)^{5/6}) time, for D=O(nlogn)D = O(\sqrt{n \log n}), and O(D1/3(nlogn)2/3)O(D^{1/3} \cdot (n \log n)^{2/3}) time, for larger DD. This running time is sublinear in nn in almost the entire range of parameters, specifically, for D=o(n/log2n)D = o(n/\log^2 n). For the all-pairs shortest paths problem, our algorithm requires O(n5/3log2/3n)O(n^{5/3} \log^{2/3} n) time, regardless of the value of DD. We also devise the first algorithm with non-trivial complexity guarantees for computing exact shortest paths in the multipass semi-streaming model of computation. From the technical viewpoint, our algorithm computes a hopset G"G" of a skeleton graph GG' of GG without first computing GG' itself. We then conduct a Bellman-Ford exploration in GG"G' \cup G", while computing the required edges of GG' on the fly. As a result, our algorithm computes exactly those edges of GG' that it really needs, rather than computing approximately the entire GG'

    Reachability and Shortest Paths in the Broadcast CONGEST Model

    Get PDF
    In this paper we study the time complexity of the single-source reachability problem and the single-source shortest path problem for directed unweighted graphs in the Broadcast CONGEST model. We focus on the case where the diameter D of the underlying network is constant. We show that for the case where D = 1 there is, quite surprisingly, a very simple algorithm that solves the reachability problem in 1(!) round. In contrast, for networks with D = 2, we show that any distributed algorithm (possibly randomized) for this problem requires Omega(sqrt{n/ log{n}}) rounds. Our results therefore completely resolve (up to a small polylog factor) the complexity of the single-source reachability problem for a wide range of diameters. Furthermore, we show that when D = 1, it is even possible to get an almost 3 - approximation for the all-pairs shortest path problem (for directed unweighted graphs) in just 2 rounds. We also prove a stronger lower bound of Omega(sqrt{n}) for the single-source shortest path problem for unweighted directed graphs that holds even when the diameter of the underlying network is 2. As far as we know this is the first lower bound that achieves Omega(sqrt{n}) for this problem

    Brief announcement: (1+)-approximate shortest paths in dynamic streams

    Get PDF
    Computing approximate shortest paths in the dynamic streaming setting is a fundamental challenge that has been intensively studied. Currently existing solutions for this problem either build a sparse multiplicative spanner of the input graph and compute shortest paths in the spanner offline, or compute an exact single source BFS tree. Solutions of the first type are doomed to incur a stretch-space tradeoff of 2k - 1 versus n1+1/k , for an integer parameter k. (In fact, existing solutions also incur an extra factor of 1+ in the stretch for weighted graphs, and an additional factor of logO(1) n in the space.) The only existing solution of the second type uses n1/2-O(1/k) passes over the stream (for space O(n1+1/k )), and applies only to unweighted graphs

    Streaming Complexity of Spanning Tree Computation

    Get PDF
    The semi-streaming model is a variant of the streaming model frequently used for the computation of graph problems. It allows the edges of an n-node input graph to be read sequentially in p passes using Õ(n) space. If the list of edges includes deletions, then the model is called the turnstile model; otherwise it is called the insertion-only model. In both models, some graph problems, such as spanning trees, k-connectivity, densest subgraph, degeneracy, cut-sparsifier, and (Δ+1)-coloring, can be exactly solved or (1+ε)-approximated in a single pass; while other graph problems, such as triangle detection and unweighted all-pairs shortest paths, are known to require Ω̃(n) passes to compute. For many fundamental graph problems, the tractability in these models is open. In this paper, we study the tractability of computing some standard spanning trees, including BFS, DFS, and maximum-leaf spanning trees. Our results, in both the insertion-only and the turnstile models, are as follows. Maximum-Leaf Spanning Trees: This problem is known to be APX-complete with inapproximability constant ρ ∈ [245/244, 2). By constructing an ε-MLST sparsifier, we show that for every constant ε > 0, MLST can be approximated in a single pass to within a factor of 1+ε w.h.p. (albeit in super-polynomial time for ε ≤ ρ-1 assuming P ≠ NP) and can be approximated in polynomial time in a single pass to within a factor of ρ_n+ε w.h.p., where ρ_n is the supremum constant that MLST cannot be approximated to within using polynomial time and Õ(n) space. In the insertion-only model, these algorithms can be deterministic. BFS Trees: It is known that BFS trees require ω(1) passes to compute, but the naïve approach needs O(n) passes. We devise a new randomized algorithm that reduces the pass complexity to O(√n), and it offers a smooth tradeoff between pass complexity and space usage. This gives a polynomial separation between single-source and all-pairs shortest paths for unweighted graphs. DFS Trees: It is unknown whether DFS trees require more than one pass. The current best algorithm by Khan and Mehta [STACS 2019] takes Õ(h) passes, where h is the height of computed DFS trees. Note that h can be as large as Ω(m/n) for n-node m-edge graphs. Our contribution is twofold. First, we provide a simple alternative proof of this result, via a new connection to sparse certificates for k-node-connectivity. Second, we present a randomized algorithm that reduces the pass complexity to O(√n), and it also offers a smooth tradeoff between pass complexity and space usage.ISSN:1868-896

    A Faster Distributed Single-Source Shortest Paths Algorithm

    Full text link
    We devise new algorithms for the single-source shortest paths (SSSP) problem with non-negative edge weights in the CONGEST model of distributed computing. While close-to-optimal solutions, in terms of the number of rounds spent by the algorithm, have recently been developed for computing SSSP approximately, the fastest known exact algorithms are still far away from matching the lower bound of Ω~(n+D) \tilde \Omega (\sqrt{n} + D) rounds by Peleg and Rubinovich [SIAM Journal on Computing 2000], where n n is the number of nodes in the network and D D is its diameter. The state of the art is Elkin's randomized algorithm [STOC 2017] that performs O~(n2/3D1/3+n5/6) \tilde O(n^{2/3} D^{1/3} + n^{5/6}) rounds. We significantly improve upon this upper bound with our two new randomized algorithms for polynomially bounded integer edge weights, the first performing O~(nD) \tilde O (\sqrt{n D}) rounds and the second performing O~(nD1/4+n3/5+D) \tilde O (\sqrt{n} D^{1/4} + n^{3/5} + D) rounds. Our bounds also compare favorably to the independent result by Ghaffari and Li [STOC 2018]. As side results, we obtain a (1+ϵ) (1 + \epsilon) -approximation O~((nD1/4+D)/ϵ) \tilde O ((\sqrt{n} D^{1/4} + D) / \epsilon) -round algorithm for directed SSSP and a new work/depth trade-off for exact SSSP on directed graphs in the PRAM model.Comment: Presented at the the 59th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2018
    corecore