Who woke the sleeping beauties in psychology?

In an earlier paper we identified three ‘sleeping beauties’ in Psychology, that is three important papers that were not cited by others for many years before becoming much later citation classics. In this paper we identify the ‘princes’ that alerted psychologists to these ‘sleeping beauties’, and we show how new computer-based techniques now help us to locate princes as well as sleeping beauties

Sleeping beauties in psychology

A ‘Sleeping beauty’ is a term used to describe a research article that has remained relatively uncited for several years and then suddenly blossoms forward. New technology now allows us to detect such articles more easily than before, and sleeping beauties can be found in numerous disciplines. In this article we describe three sleeping beauties that we have found in psychology—Stroop (J Exp Psychol 18:643–662, 1935), Maslow (Psychol Rev 50(4):370–396, 1943), and Simon (Psychol Rev 63(2):129–138, 1956)

Identifying potentially excellent publications using a citation-based machine learning approach

Excellent research papers are vital to science and technology advances. Thus, the early identification of potentially excellent research papers and recognizing their value in science and technology is high on the research agenda. This study used a set of 5 static and 8 time-dependent citation features to explore six machine learning methods and identify the method with the best performance to identify potentially excellent papers. The study modelled Random Forest, LightGBM, Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, Neural Network, and TabNet to identify PEPs in the artificial intelligence field. The study defined highly cited papers using the threshold of the top 1% and top 5% and collected the data from the Web of Science®. Bibliometric and citation data from 485,041 research articles, proceeding papers, and reviews published in AI between 1990 and 2010 were collected initially. The data was screened and processed, and the final dataset consists of 96,169 papers for the training and test sets. The findings suggest that the time-dependent citation features are more important than the static features, and citation peak features are more significant than the citation features in identifying potentially excellent papers. The findings demonstrate the effect of threshold on machine learning outcomes (e.g., the top 1% and 5%); therefore, the study argues that the decision about threshold selection should be carefully made. LightGBM and Random Forest both performed with the given conditions and achieved the same score in accuracy and recall. Nevertheless, when comparing their performance in other indicators, such as F1 and cross-entropy loss, LightGBM performed better. The study concluded that LightGBM was the best-performing model for identifying potentially excellent papers. The papers identified the contributions and recommended future research

Science of science: Biological research network

The science of science studies how scientists do research effectively. In this thesis, we focus on the science of biology by analyzing a biological research network which is defined as a graph where species are nodes and common papers between species are links. Building upon the idea that many biological papers relate and compare at least two species, we evaluate a series of hypotheses using various analysis techniques and find the importance of model organisms and humans in biological research. Based on these findings, we analyze whether these species are treated differently in biological research. On a global scale, we try to predict sleeping beauty species that may become important in the future despite not being popular at present and try to predict what pairings of species may be influential in biology