Quantitative Analysis of Radiation-Associated Parenchymal Lung Change

Radiation-induced lung damage (RILD) is a common consequence of thoracic radiotherapy (RT). We present here a novel classification of the parenchymal features of RILD. We developed a deep learning algorithm (DLA) to automate the delineation of 5 classes of parenchymal texture of increasing density. 200 scans were used to train and validate the network and the remaining 30 scans were used as a hold-out test set. The DLA automatically labelled the data with Dice Scores of 0.98, 0.43, 0.26, 0.47 and 0.92 for the 5 respective classes. Qualitative evaluation showed that the automated labels were acceptable in over 80% of cases for all tissue classes, and achieved similar ratings to the manual labels. Lung registration was performed and the effect of radiation dose on each tissue class and correlation with respiratory outcomes was assessed. The change in volume of each tissue class over time generated by manual and automated segmentation was calculated. The 5 parenchymal classes showed distinct temporal patterns We quantified the volumetric change in textures after radiotherapy and correlate these with radiotherapy dose and respiratory outcomes. The effect of local dose on tissue class revealed a strong dose-dependent relationship We have developed a novel classification of parenchymal changes associated with RILD that show a convincing dose relationship. The tissue classes are related to both global and local dose metrics, and have a distinct evolution over time. Although less strong, there is a relationship between the radiological texture changes we can measure and respiratory outcomes, particularly the MRC score which directly represents a patient’s functional status. We have demonstrated the potential of using our approach to analyse and understand the morphological and functional evolution of RILD in greater detail than previously possible

Optimization of Decision Making in Personalized Radiation Therapy using Deformable Image Registration

Cancer has become one of the dominant diseases worldwide, especially in western countries, and radiation therapy is one of the primary treatment options for 50% of all patients diagnosed. Radiation therapy involves the radiation delivery and planning based on radiobiological models derived primarily from clinical trials. Since 2015 improvements in information technologies and data storage allowed new models to be created using the large volumes of treatment data already available and correlate the actually delivered treatment with outcomes. The goals of this thesis are to 1) construct models of patient outcomes after receiving radiation therapy using available treatment and patient parameters and 2) provide a method to determine real accumulated radiation dose including the impact of registration uncertainties. In Chapter 2, a model was developed predicting overall survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastasis receiving radiation therapy. These models show which patients benefit from curative radiation therapy based on liver function, and the survival benefit of increased radiation dose on survival. In Chapter 3, a method was developed to routinely evaluate deformable image registration (DIR) with computer-generated landmark pairs using the scale-invariant feature transform. The method presented in this chapter created landmark sets for comparing lung 4DCT images and provided the same evaluation of DIR as manual landmark sets. In Chapter 4, an investigation was performed on the impact of DIR error on dose accumulation using landmarked 4DCT images as the ground truth. The study demonstrated the relationship between dose gradient, DIR error and dose accumulation error, and presented a method to determine error bars on the dose accumulation process. In Chapter 5, a method was presented to determine quantitatively when to update a treatment plan during the course of a multi-fraction radiation treatment of head and neck cancer. This method investigated the ability to use only the planned dose with deformable image registration to predict dose changes caused by anatomical deformations. This thesis presents the fundamental elements of a decision support system including patient pre-treatment parameters and the actual delivered dose using DIR while considering registration uncertainties

Applications of Medical Physics

Applications of Medical Physics” is a Special Issue of Applied Sciences that has collected original research manuscripts describing cutting-edge physics developments in medicine and their translational applications. Reviews providing updates on the latest progresses in this field are also included. The collection includes a total of 20 contributions by authors from 9 different countries, which cover several areas of medical physics, spanning from radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, radiology, dosimetry, radiation protection, and radiobiology

3D fusion of histology to multi-parametric MRI for prostate cancer imaging evaluation and lesion-targeted treatment planning

Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of localized prostate cancer has the potential to support detection, staging and localization of tumors, as well as selection, delivery and monitoring of treatments. Delineating prostate cancer tumors on imaging could potentially further support the clinical workflow by enabling precise monitoring of tumor burden in active-surveillance patients, optimized targeting of image-guided biopsies, and targeted delivery of treatments to decrease morbidity and improve outcomes. Evaluating the performance of mpMRI for prostate cancer imaging and delineation ideally includes comparison to an accurately registered reference standard, such as prostatectomy histology, for the locations of tumor boundaries on mpMRI. There are key gaps in knowledge regarding how to accurately register histological reference standards to imaging, and consequently further gaps in knowledge regarding the suitability of mpMRI for tasks, such as tumor delineation, that require such reference standards for evaluation. To obtain an understanding of the magnitude of the mpMRI-histology registration problem, we quantified the position, orientation and deformation of whole-mount histology sections relative to the formalin-fixed tissue slices from which they were cut. We found that (1) modeling isotropic scaling accounted for the majority of the deformation with a further small but statistically significant improvement from modeling affine transformation, and (2) due to the depth (mean±standard deviation (SD) 1.1±0.4 mm) and orientation (mean±SD 1.5±0.9°) of the sectioning, the assumption that histology sections are cut from the front faces of tissue slices, common in previous approaches, introduced a mean error of 0.7 mm. To determine the potential consequences of seemingly small registration errors such as described above, we investigated the impact of registration accuracy on the statistical power of imaging validation studies using a co-registered spatial reference standard (e.g. histology images) by deriving novel statistical power formulae that incorporate registration error. We illustrated, through a case study modeled on a prostate cancer imaging trial at our centre, that submillimeter differences in registration error can have a substantial impact on the required sample sizes (and therefore also the study cost) for studies aiming to detect mpMRI signal differences due to 0.5 – 2.0 cm3 prostate tumors. With the aim of achieving highly accurate mpMRI-histology registrations without disrupting the clinical pathology workflow, we developed a three-stage method for accurately registering 2D whole-mount histology images to pre-prostatectomy mpMRI that allowed flexible placement of cuts during slicing for pathology and avoided the assumption that histology sections are cut from the front faces of tissue slices. The method comprised a 3D reconstruction of histology images, followed by 3D–3D ex vivo–in vivo and in vivo–in vivo image transformations. The 3D reconstruction method minimized fiducial registration error between cross-sections of non-disruptive histology- and ex-vivo-MRI-visible strand-shaped fiducials to reconstruct histology images into the coordinate system of an ex vivo MR image. We quantified the mean±standard deviation target registration error of the reconstruction to be 0.7±0.4 mm, based on the post-reconstruction misalignment of intrinsic landmark pairs. We also compared our fiducial-based reconstruction to an alternative reconstruction based on mutual-information-based registration, an established method for multi-modality registration. We found that the mean target registration error for the fiducial-based method (0.7 mm) was lower than that for the mutual-information-based method (1.2 mm), and that the mutual-information-based method was less robust to initialization error due to multiple sources of error, including the optimizer and the mutual information similarity metric. The second stage of the histology–mpMRI registration used interactively defined 3D–3D deformable thin-plate-spline transformations to align ex vivo to in vivo MR images to compensate for deformation due to endorectal MR coil positioning, surgical resection and formalin fixation. The third stage used interactively defined 3D–3D rigid or thin-plate-spline transformations to co-register in vivo mpMRI images to compensate for patient motion and image distortion. The combined mean registration error of the histology–mpMRI registration was quantified to be 2 mm using manually identified intrinsic landmark pairs. Our data set, comprising mpMRI, target volumes contoured by four observers and co-registered contoured and graded histology images, was used to quantify the positive predictive values and variability of observer scoring of lesions following the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines, the variability of target volume contouring, and appropriate expansion margins from target volumes to achieve coverage of histologically defined cancer. The analysis of lesion scoring showed that a PI-RADS overall cancer likelihood of 5, denoting “highly likely cancer”, had a positive predictive value of 85% for Gleason 7 cancer (and 93% for lesions with volumes \u3e0.5 cm3 measured on mpMRI) and that PI-RADS scores were positively correlated with histological grade (ρ=0.6). However, the analysis also showed interobserver differences in PI-RADS score of 0.6 to 1.2 (on a 5-point scale) and an agreement kappa value of only 0.30. The analysis of target volume contouring showed that target volume contours with suitable margins can achieve near-complete histological coverage for detected lesions, despite the presence of high interobserver spatial variability in target volumes. Prostate cancer imaging and delineation have the potential to support multiple stages in the management of localized prostate cancer. Targeted biopsy procedures with optimized targeting based on tumor delineation may help distinguish patients who need treatment from those who need active surveillance. Ongoing monitoring of tumor burden based on delineation in patients undergoing active surveillance may help identify those who need to progress to therapy early while the cancer is still curable. Preferentially targeting therapies at delineated target volumes may lower the morbidity associated with aggressive cancer treatment and improve outcomes in low-intermediate-risk patients. Measurements of the accuracy and variability of lesion scoring and target volume contouring on mpMRI will clarify its value in supporting these roles