5 research outputs found
Defending Elections Against Malicious Spread of Misinformation
The integrity of democratic elections depends on voters' access to accurate
information. However, modern media environments, which are dominated by social
media, provide malicious actors with unprecedented ability to manipulate
elections via misinformation, such as fake news. We study a zero-sum game
between an attacker, who attempts to subvert an election by propagating a fake
new story or other misinformation over a set of advertising channels, and a
defender who attempts to limit the attacker's impact. Computing an equilibrium
in this game is challenging as even the pure strategy sets of players are
exponential. Nevertheless, we give provable polynomial-time approximation
algorithms for computing the defender's minimax optimal strategy across a range
of settings, encompassing different population structures as well as models of
the information available to each player. Experimental results confirm that our
algorithms provide near-optimal defender strategies and showcase variations in
the difficulty of defending elections depending on the resources and knowledge
available to the defender.Comment: Full version of paper accepted to AAAI 201
Persuading Voters: It's Easy to Whisper, It's Hard to Speak Loud
We focus on the following natural question: is it possible to influence the
outcome of a voting process through the strategic provision of information to
voters who update their beliefs rationally? We investigate whether it is
computationally tractable to design a signaling scheme maximizing the
probability with which the sender's preferred candidate is elected. We focus on
the model recently introduced by Arieli and Babichenko (2019) (i.e., without
inter-agent externalities), and consider, as explanatory examples, -voting
rule and plurality voting. There is a sharp contrast between the case in which
private signals are allowed and the more restrictive setting in which only
public signals are allowed. In the former, we show that an optimal signaling
scheme can be computed efficiently both under a -voting rule and plurality
voting. In establishing these results, we provide two general (i.e., applicable
to settings beyond voting) contributions. Specifically, we extend a well known
result by Dughmi and Xu (2017) to more general settings, and prove that, when
the sender's utility function is anonymous, computing an optimal signaling
scheme is fixed parameter tractable w.r.t. the number of receivers' actions. In
the public signaling case, we show that the sender's optimal expected return
cannot be approximated to within any factor under a -voting rule. This
negative result easily extends to plurality voting and problems where utility
functions are anonymous