Susceptible workload driven selective fault tolerance using a probabilistic fault model

In this paper, we present a novel fault tolerance design technique, which is applicable at the register transfer level, based on protecting the functionality of logic circuits using a probabilistic fault model. The proposed technique selects the most susceptible workload of combinational circuits to protect against probabilistic faults. The workload susceptibility is ranked as the likelihood of any fault to bypass the inherent logical masking of the circuit and propagate an erroneous response to its outputs, when that workload is executed. The workload protection is achieved through a Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) scheme by using the patterns that have been evaluated as most susceptible. We apply the proposed technique on LGSynth91 and ISCAS85 benchmarks and evaluate its fault tolerance capabilities against errors induced by permanent faults and soft errors. We show that the proposed technique, when it is applied to protect only the 32 most susceptible patterns, achieves on average of all the examined benchmarks, an error coverage improvement of 98% and 94% against errors induced by single stuck-at faults (permanent faults) and soft errors (transient faults), respectively, compared to a reduced TMR scheme that protects the same number of susceptible patterns without ranking them

Fault-Independent Test-Generation for Software-Based Self-Testing

Software-based self-test (SBST) is being widely used in both manufacturing and in-the-field testing of processor-based devices and Systems-on-Chips. Unfortunately, the stuck-at fault model is increasingly inadequate to match the new and different types of defects in the most recent semiconductor technologies, while the explicit and separate targeting of every fault model in SBST is cumbersome due to the high complexity of the test-generation process, the lack of automation tools, and the high CPU-intensity of the fault-simulation process. Moreover, defects in advanced semiconductor technologies are not always covered by the most commonly used fault-models, and the probability of defect-escapes increases even more. To overcome these shortcomings we propose the first fault-independent SBST method. The proposed method is almost fully automated, it offers high coverage of non-modeled faults by means of a novel SBST-oriented probabilistic metric, and it is very fast as it omits the time-consuming test-generation/fault-simulation processes. Extensive experiments on the OpenRISC OR1200 processor show the advantages of the proposed method

Fault-Independent Test-Generation for Software-Based Self-Testing

Software-based self-test (SBST) is being widely used in both manufacturing and in-the-field testing of processor-based devices and Systems-on-Chips. Unfortunately, the stuck-at fault model is increasingly inadequate to match the new and different types of defects in the most recent semiconductor technologies, while the explicit and separate targeting of every fault model in SBST is cumbersome due to the high complexity of the test-generation process, the lack of automation tools, and the high CPU-intensity of the fault-simulation process. Moreover, defects in advanced semiconductor technologies are not always covered by the most commonly used fault-models, and the probability of defect-escapes increases even more. To overcome these shortcomings we propose the first fault-independent SBST method. The proposed method is almost fully automated, it offers high coverage of non-modeled faults by means of a novel SBST-oriented probabilistic metric, and it is very fast as it omits the time-consuming test-generation/fault-simulation processes. Extensive experiments on the OpenRISC OR1200 processor show the advantages of the proposed method

Susceptible Workload Evaluation and Protection using Selective Fault Tolerance

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International License CC-BY 4.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.Low power fault tolerance design techniques trade reliability to reduce the area cost and the power overhead of integrated circuits by protecting only a subset of their workload or their most vulnerable parts. However, in the presence of faults not all workloads are equally susceptible to errors. In this paper, we present a low power fault tolerance design technique that selects and protects the most susceptible workload. We propose to rank the workload susceptibility as the likelihood of any error to bypass the logic masking of the circuit and propagate to its outputs. The susceptible workload is protected by a partial Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) scheme. We evaluate the proposed technique on timing-independent and timing-dependent errors induced by permanent and transient faults. In comparison with unranked selective fault tolerance approach, we demonstrate a) a similar error coverage with a 39.7% average reduction of the area overhead or b) a 86.9% average error coverage improvement for a similar area overhead. For the same area overhead case, we observe an error coverage improvement of 53.1% and 53.5% against permanent stuck-at and transition faults, respectively, and an average error coverage improvement of 151.8% and 89.0% against timing-dependent and timing-independent transient faults, respectively. Compared to TMR, the proposed technique achieves an area and power overhead reduction of 145.8% to 182.0%.Peer reviewedFinal Published versio

Fault-Independent Test-Generation for Software-Based Self-Testing

Software-based self-test (SBST) is being widely used in both manufacturing and in-the-field testing of processor-based devices and Systems-on-Chips. Unfortunately, the stuck-at fault model is increasingly inadequate to match the new and different types of defects in the most recent semiconductor technologies, while the explicit and separate targeting of every fault model in SBST is cumbersome due to the high complexity of the test-generation process, the lack of automation tools, and the high CPU-intensity of the fault-simulation process. Moreover, defects in advanced semiconductor technologies are not always covered by the most commonly used fault-models, and the probability of defect-escapes increases even more. To overcome these shortcomings we propose the first fault-independent method for generating software-based self-test procedures. The proposed method is almost fully automated, it offers high coverage of non- modeled faults by means of a novel SBST-oriented probabilistic metric, and it is very fast as it omits the time-consuming test- generation/fault-simulation processes. Extensive experiments on the OpenRISC OR1200 processor show the advantages of the proposed method

Defect-oriented LFSR reseeding to target unmodeled defects using stuck-at test sets

Defect screening is a major challenge for nanoscale CMOS circuits, especially since many defects cannot be accurately modeled using known fault models. The effectiveness of test methods for such circuits can therefore be measured in terms of the coverage obtained for unmodeled faults. In this paper, we present a new defect-oriented dynamic LFSR reseeding technique for test-data compression. The proposed technique is based on a new output-deviation metric for grading stuck-at patterns derived from LFSR seeds. We show that, compared to standard compression-driven dynamic LFSR reseeding and a previously proposed deviation-based method, higher defect coverage is obtained using stuck-at test cubes without any loss of compression