859 research outputs found
Cognitive Computation sans Representation
The Computational Theory of Mind (CTM) holds that cognitive processes are essentially computational, and hence computation provides the scientific key to explaining mentality. The Representational Theory of Mind (RTM) holds that representational content is the key feature in distinguishing mental from non-mental systems. I argue that there is a deep incompatibility between these two theoretical frameworks, and that the acceptance of CTM provides strong grounds for rejecting RTM. The focal point of the incompatibility is the fact that representational content is extrinsic to formal procedures as such, and the intended interpretation of syntax makes no difference to the execution of an algorithm. So the unique 'content' postulated by RTM is superfluous to the formal procedures of CTM. And once these procedures are implemented in a physical mechanism, it is exclusively the causal properties of the physical mechanism that are responsible for all aspects of the system's behaviour. So once again, postulated content is rendered superfluous. To the extent that semantic content may appear to play a role in behaviour, it must be syntactically encoded within the system, and just as in a standard computational artefact, so too with the human mind/brain - it's pure syntax all the way down to the level of physical implementation. Hence 'content' is at most a convenient meta-level gloss, projected from the outside by human theorists, which itself can play no role in cognitive processing
The minimal computational substrate of fluid intelligence
The quantification of cognitive powers rests on identifying a behavioural
task that depends on them. Such dependence cannot be assured, for the powers a
task invokes cannot be experimentally controlled or constrained a priori,
resulting in unknown vulnerability to failure of specificity and
generalisability. Evaluating a compact version of Raven's Advanced Progressive
Matrices (RAPM), a widely used clinical test of fluid intelligence, we show
that LaMa, a self-supervised artificial neural network trained solely on the
completion of partially masked images of natural environmental scenes, achieves
human-level test scores a prima vista, without any task-specific inductive bias
or training. Compared with cohorts of healthy and focally lesioned
participants, LaMa exhibits human-like variation with item difficulty, and
produces errors characteristic of right frontal lobe damage under degradation
of its ability to integrate global spatial patterns. LaMa's narrow training and
limited capacity -- comparable to the nervous system of the fruit fly --
suggest RAPM may be open to computationally simple solutions that need not
necessarily invoke abstract reasoning.Comment: 26 pages, 5 figure
Interpretability and Explainability: A Machine Learning Zoo Mini-tour
In this review, we examine the problem of designing interpretable and
explainable machine learning models. Interpretability and explainability lie at
the core of many machine learning and statistical applications in medicine,
economics, law, and natural sciences. Although interpretability and
explainability have escaped a clear universal definition, many techniques
motivated by these properties have been developed over the recent 30 years with
the focus currently shifting towards deep learning methods. In this review, we
emphasise the divide between interpretability and explainability and illustrate
these two different research directions with concrete examples of the
state-of-the-art. The review is intended for a general machine learning
audience with interest in exploring the problems of interpretation and
explanation beyond logistic regression or random forest variable importance.
This work is not an exhaustive literature survey, but rather a primer focusing
selectively on certain lines of research which the authors found interesting or
informative
Proceedings of the ECCS 2005 satellite workshop: embracing complexity in design - Paris 17 November 2005
Embracing complexity in design is one of the critical issues and challenges of the 21st century. As the realization grows that design activities and artefacts display properties associated with complex adaptive systems, so grows the need to use complexity concepts and methods to understand these properties and inform the design of better artifacts. It is a great challenge because complexity science represents an epistemological and methodological swift that promises a holistic approach in the understanding and operational support of design. But design is also a major contributor in complexity research. Design science is concerned with problems that are fundamental in the sciences in general and complexity sciences in particular. For instance, design has been perceived and studied as a ubiquitous activity inherent in every human activity, as the art of generating hypotheses, as a type of experiment, or as a creative co-evolutionary process. Design science and its established approaches and practices can be a great source for advancement and innovation in complexity science. These proceedings are the result of a workshop organized as part of the activities of a UK government AHRB/EPSRC funded research cluster called Embracing Complexity in Design (www.complexityanddesign.net) and the European Conference in Complex Systems (complexsystems.lri.fr). Embracing complexity in design is one of the critical issues and challenges of the 21st century. As the realization grows that design activities and artefacts display properties associated with complex adaptive systems, so grows the need to use complexity concepts and methods to understand these properties and inform the design of better artifacts. It is a great challenge because complexity science represents an epistemological and methodological swift that promises a holistic approach in the understanding and operational support of design. But design is also a major contributor in complexity research. Design science is concerned with problems that are fundamental in the sciences in general and complexity sciences in particular. For instance, design has been perceived and studied as a ubiquitous activity inherent in every human activity, as the art of generating hypotheses, as a type of experiment, or as a creative co-evolutionary process. Design science and its established approaches and practices can be a great source for advancement and innovation in complexity science. These proceedings are the result of a workshop organized as part of the activities of a UK government AHRB/EPSRC funded research cluster called Embracing Complexity in Design (www.complexityanddesign.net) and the European Conference in Complex Systems (complexsystems.lri.fr)
Environmental and genetic risk factors for tinnitus
Tinnitus is a phantom auditory sensation, most often referred to as âringing in the earsâ with detrimental effect on quality of life. Between 4% and 37% of the global population has experienced tinnitus at some point in their life. For every 1 out of 10 individuals experiencing tinnitus, it becomes a severely impactful condition, affecting concentration, sleep, mood, and general quality of life. Despite its high prevalence and severe socio-economic burden, there is no successful treatment. The work presented in this thesis uses multiple scientific approaches to better understand the etiology of tinnitus, with the emphasis on the genetic landscape in order to gain insight into its molecular origins. First, we identify important gaps in knowledge on environmental risk factors associated with tinnitus. Second, we show using genetic epidemiology methods that severe tinnitus runs in families, which changes the current narrative that tinnitus would be generated purely due to environmental factors. Third, as tinnitus is commonly linked to hearing loss, we used a genome-wide biostatistical approach to reveal the genetic architecture of hearing loss, that will be further essential in distinguishing the two conditions. Fourth, we investigated the whole genome in relation to tinnitus to map correlated genomic regions and consequently, specific genes associated with tinnitus. Finally, we used a high-throughput sequencing of protein coding regions of the genome to identify disease-causing mutations impacting severe tinnitus. The work presented in this thesis provides insights from multiple aspects into the origins of tinnitus and will serve as a backbone to understanding the pathophysiology of the disorder
- âŠ