45,308 research outputs found

    Verification for Timed Automata extended with Unbounded Discrete Data Structures

    Full text link
    We study decidability of verification problems for timed automata extended with unbounded discrete data structures. More detailed, we extend timed automata with a pushdown stack. In this way, we obtain a strong model that may for instance be used to model real-time programs with procedure calls. It is long known that the reachability problem for this model is decidable. The goal of this paper is to identify subclasses of timed pushdown automata for which the language inclusion problem and related problems are decidable

    More than one way to see it: Individual heuristics in avian visual computation

    Get PDF
    Comparative pattern learning experiments investigate how different species find regularities in sensory input, providing insights into cognitive processing in humans and other animals. Past research has focused either on one species’ ability to process pattern classes or different species’ performance in recognizing the same pattern, with little attention to individual and species-specific heuristics and decision strategies. We trained and tested two bird species, pigeons (Columba livia) and kea (Nestor notabilis, a parrot species), on visual patterns using touch-screen technology. Patterns were composed of several abstract elements and had varying degrees of structural complexity. We developed a model selection paradigm, based on regular expressions, that allowed us to reconstruct the specific decision strategies and cognitive heuristics adopted by a given individual in our task. Individual birds showed considerable differences in the number, type and heterogeneity of heuristic strategies adopted. Birds’ choices also exhibited consistent species-level differences. Kea adopted effective heuristic strategies, based on matching learned bigrams to stimulus edges. Individual pigeons, in contrast, adopted an idiosyncratic mix of strategies that included local transition probabilities and global string similarity. Although performance was above chance and quite high for kea, no individual of either species provided clear evidence of learning exactly the rule used to generate the training stimuli. Our results show that similar behavioral outcomes can be achieved using dramatically different strategies and highlight the dangers of combining multiple individuals in a group analysis. These findings, and our general approach, have implications for the design of future pattern learning experiments, and the interpretation of comparative cognition research more generally

    Fast Label Extraction in the CDAWG

    Full text link
    The compact directed acyclic word graph (CDAWG) of a string TT of length nn takes space proportional just to the number ee of right extensions of the maximal repeats of TT, and it is thus an appealing index for highly repetitive datasets, like collections of genomes from similar species, in which ee grows significantly more slowly than nn. We reduce from O(mloglogn)O(m\log{\log{n}}) to O(m)O(m) the time needed to count the number of occurrences of a pattern of length mm, using an existing data structure that takes an amount of space proportional to the size of the CDAWG. This implies a reduction from O(mloglogn+occ)O(m\log{\log{n}}+\mathtt{occ}) to O(m+occ)O(m+\mathtt{occ}) in the time needed to locate all the occ\mathtt{occ} occurrences of the pattern. We also reduce from O(kloglogn)O(k\log{\log{n}}) to O(k)O(k) the time needed to read the kk characters of the label of an edge of the suffix tree of TT, and we reduce from O(mloglogn)O(m\log{\log{n}}) to O(m)O(m) the time needed to compute the matching statistics between a query of length mm and TT, using an existing representation of the suffix tree based on the CDAWG. All such improvements derive from extracting the label of a vertex or of an arc of the CDAWG using a straight-line program induced by the reversed CDAWG.Comment: 16 pages, 1 figure. In proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE 2017). arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1705.0864
    corecore