6 research outputs found

    A smaller cover for closed unit curves]{A smaller cover for closed unit curves

    Get PDF
    Forty years ago Schaer and Wetzel showed that a 1π×12ππ2βˆ’4\frac{1}{\pi}\times\frac {1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\pi^{2}-4} rectangle, whose area is about 0.122 74,0.122\,74, is the smallest rectangle that is a cover for the family of all closed unit arcs. More recently F\"{u}redi and Wetzel showed that one corner of this rectangle can be clipped to form a pentagonal cover having area 0.112240.11224 for this family of curves. Here we show that then the opposite corner can be clipped to form a hexagonal cover of area less than 0.110230.11023 for this same family. This irregular hexagon is the smallest cover currently known for this family of arcs.Comment: In the appendix, the computer code for numerical optimization is provided together with explanation. The link to the actual file, a Mathematica notebook, is at www.math.sc.chula.ac.th/~wacharin/optimization/closed%20arc

    Universal convex covering problems under translation and discrete rotations

    Full text link
    We consider the smallest-area universal covering of planar objects of perimeter 2 (or equivalently closed curves of length 2) allowing translation and discrete rotations. In particular, we show that the solution is an equilateral triangle of height 1 when translation and discrete rotation of Ο€\pi are allowed. Our proof is purely geometric and elementary. We also give convex coverings of closed curves of length 2 under translation and discrete rotations of multiples of Ο€/2\pi/2 and 2Ο€/32\pi/3. We show a minimality of the covering for discrete rotation of multiples of Ο€/2\pi/2, which is an equilateral triangle of height smaller than 1, and conjecture that the covering is the smallest-area convex covering. Finally, we give the smallest-area convex coverings of all unit segments under translation and discrete rotations 2Ο€/k2\pi/k for all integers kβ‰₯3k\ge 3

    Annular breadth of hinges & hinge exit paths of annuli

    Get PDF
    Given a compact set \textsf{S}\subset\mathds{R}^2, we define the annular width function for S\textsf{S}, denoted w(E)w(E), as the width of the annulus of support of S\textsf{S} centered at E\in\overline{\mathds{R}^2}, where \overline{\mathds{R}^2} is an extension of the real plane \mathds{R}^2. The annular breadth of S\textsf{S} is defined as the absolute minimum of w(E)w(E). We find the 22-segment polygonal arc with the greatest annular breadth. For a given set \textsf{S}\subset\mathds{R}^2, an exit path of S\textsf{S} is a curve that cannot be covered by the interior of S\textsf{S}. Given an annulus, we find its shortest 11- or 22-segment polygonal arc exit path(s). Bezdek and Connelly provided a lengthy and technically demanding proof that \emph{All orbiforms of width} 11 \emph{are translation covers of the set of closed planar curves of length} 22 \emph{or less}. We provide a short and simple proof that \emph{All orbiforms of width} 11 \emph{are covers of the set of all planar curves of length} 11 \emph{or less}. We also provide a proof that \emph{The Reuleaux triangle of width} 11 \emph{is a cover of the set of all closed curves of length} 22 using a recent of Wichiramala

    Errata and Addenda to Mathematical Constants

    Full text link
    We humbly and briefly offer corrections and supplements to Mathematical Constants (2003) and Mathematical Constants II (2019), both published by Cambridge University Press. Comments are always welcome.Comment: 162 page
    corecore