16,886 research outputs found
Confluence as a cut elimination property
The goal of this note is to compare two notions, one coming from the theory
of rewrite systems and the other from proof theory: confluence and cut
elimination. We show that to each rewrite system on terms, we can associate a
logical system: asymmetric deduction modulo this rewrite system and that the
confluence property of the rewrite system is equivalent to the cut elimination
property of the associated logical system. This equivalence, however, does not
extend to rewrite systems directly rewriting atomic propositions
Exponentials as Substitutions and the Cost of Cut Elimination in Linear Logic
This paper introduces the exponential substitution calculus (ESC), a new
presentation of cut elimination for IMELL, based on proof terms and building on
the idea that exponentials can be seen as explicit substitutions. The idea in
itself is not new, but here it is pushed to a new level, inspired by Accattoli
and Kesner's linear substitution calculus (LSC). One of the key properties of
the LSC is that it naturally models the sub-term property of abstract machines,
that is the key ingredient for the study of reasonable time cost models for the
-calculus. The new ESC is then used to design a cut elimination
strategy with the sub-term property, providing the first polynomial cost model
for cut elimination with unconstrained exponentials. For the ESC, we also prove
untyped confluence and typed strong normalization, showing that it is an
alternative to proof nets for an advanced study of cut elimination
Linear Logic and Strong Normalization
Strong normalization for linear logic requires elaborated rewriting techniques. In this paper we give a new presentation of MELL proof nets, without any commutative cut-elimination rule. We show how this feature induces a compact and simple proof of strong normalization, via reducibility candidates. It is the first proof of strong normalization for MELL which does not rely on any form of confluence, and so it smoothly scales up to full linear logic. Moreover, it is an axiomatic proof, as more generally it holds for every set of rewriting rules satisfying three very natural requirements with respect to substitution, commutation with promotion, full composition, and Kesner\u27s IE property. The insight indeed comes from the theory of explicit substitutions, and from looking at the exponentials as a substitution device
Definitions by Rewriting in the Calculus of Constructions
The main novelty of this paper is to consider an extension of the Calculus of
Constructions where predicates can be defined with a general form of rewrite
rules. We prove the strong normalization of the reduction relation generated by
the beta-rule and the user-defined rules under some general syntactic
conditions including confluence. As examples, we show that two important
systems satisfy these conditions: a sub-system of the Calculus of Inductive
Constructions which is the basis of the proof assistant Coq, and the Natural
Deduction Modulo a large class of equational theories.Comment: Best student paper (Kleene Award
Labelled Lambda-calculi with Explicit Copy and Erase
We present two rewriting systems that define labelled explicit substitution
lambda-calculi. Our work is motivated by the close correspondence between
Levy's labelled lambda-calculus and paths in proof-nets, which played an
important role in the understanding of the Geometry of Interaction. The
structure of the labels in Levy's labelled lambda-calculus relates to the
multiplicative information of paths; the novelty of our work is that we design
labelled explicit substitution calculi that also keep track of exponential
information present in call-by-value and call-by-name translations of the
lambda-calculus into linear logic proof-nets
Expansion Trees with Cut
Herbrand's theorem is one of the most fundamental insights in logic. From the
syntactic point of view it suggests a compact representation of proofs in
classical first- and higher-order logic by recording the information which
instances have been chosen for which quantifiers, known in the literature as
expansion trees.
Such a representation is inherently analytic and hence corresponds to a
cut-free sequent calculus proof. Recently several extensions of such proof
representations to proofs with cut have been proposed. These extensions are
based on graphical formalisms similar to proof nets and are limited to prenex
formulas.
In this paper we present a new approach that directly extends expansion trees
by cuts and covers also non-prenex formulas. We describe a cut-elimination
procedure for our expansion trees with cut that is based on the natural
reduction steps. We prove that it is weakly normalizing using methods from the
epsilon-calculus
A semantic account of strong normalization in Linear Logic
We prove that given two cut free nets of linear logic, by means of their
relational interpretations one can: 1) first determine whether or not the net
obtained by cutting the two nets is strongly normalizable 2) then (in case it
is strongly normalizable) compute the maximal length of the reduction sequences
starting from that net.Comment: 41 page
A Focused Sequent Calculus Framework for Proof Search in Pure Type Systems
Basic proof-search tactics in logic and type theory can be seen as the
root-first applications of rules in an appropriate sequent calculus, preferably
without the redundancies generated by permutation of rules. This paper
addresses the issues of defining such sequent calculi for Pure Type Systems
(PTS, which were originally presented in natural deduction style) and then
organizing their rules for effective proof-search. We introduce the idea of
Pure Type Sequent Calculus with meta-variables (PTSCalpha), by enriching the
syntax of a permutation-free sequent calculus for propositional logic due to
Herbelin, which is strongly related to natural deduction and already well
adapted to proof-search. The operational semantics is adapted from Herbelin's
and is defined by a system of local rewrite rules as in cut-elimination, using
explicit substitutions. We prove confluence for this system. Restricting our
attention to PTSC, a type system for the ground terms of this system, we obtain
the Subject Reduction property and show that each PTSC is logically equivalent
to its corresponding PTS, and the former is strongly normalising iff the latter
is. We show how to make the logical rules of PTSC into a syntax-directed system
PS for proof-search, by incorporating the conversion rules as in
syntax-directed presentations of the PTS rules for type-checking. Finally, we
consider how to use the explicitly scoped meta-variables of PTSCalpha to
represent partial proof-terms, and use them to analyse interactive proof
construction. This sets up a framework PE in which we are able to study
proof-search strategies, type inhabitant enumeration and (higher-order)
unification
Deduction modulo theory
This paper is a survey on Deduction modulo theor
- …