17 research outputs found
Learning Action Models: Qualitative Approach
In dynamic epistemic logic, actions are described using action models. In
this paper we introduce a framework for studying learnability of action models
from observations. We present first results concerning propositional action
models. First we check two basic learnability criteria: finite identifiability
(conclusively inferring the appropriate action model in finite time) and
identifiability in the limit (inconclusive convergence to the right action
model). We show that deterministic actions are finitely identifiable, while
non-deterministic actions require more learning power-they are identifiable in
the limit. We then move on to a particular learning method, which proceeds via
restriction of a space of events within a learning-specific action model. This
way of learning closely resembles the well-known update method from dynamic
epistemic logic. We introduce several different learning methods suited for
finite identifiability of particular types of deterministic actions.Comment: 18 pages, accepted for LORI-V: The Fifth International Conference on
Logic, Rationality and Interaction, October 28-31, 2015, National Taiwan
University, Taipei, Taiwa
A Gentle Introduction to Epistemic Planning: The DEL Approach
Epistemic planning can be used for decision making in multi-agent situations
with distributed knowledge and capabilities. Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) has
been shown to provide a very natural and expressive framework for epistemic
planning. In this paper, we aim to give an accessible introduction to DEL-based
epistemic planning. The paper starts with the most classical framework for
planning, STRIPS, and then moves towards epistemic planning in a number of
smaller steps, where each step is motivated by the need to be able to model
more complex planning scenarios.Comment: In Proceedings M4M9 2017, arXiv:1703.0173
Verifying existence of resource-bounded coalition uniform strategies
We consider the problem of whether a coalition of agents has a knowledge-based strategy to ensure some outcome under a resource bound. We extend previous work on verification of multi-agent systems where actions of agents produce and consume resources, by adding epistemic pre- and postconditions to actions. This allows us to model scenarios where agents perform both actions which change the world, and actions which change their knowledge about the world, such as observation and communication. To avoid logical omniscience and obtain a compact model of the system, our model of agents’ knowledge is syntactic.We define a class of coalition-uniform strategies with respect to any (decidable) notion of coalition knowledge. We show that the model-checking problem for the resulting logic is decidable for any notion of coalition uniform strategies in these classes
Bisimulation and expressivity for conditional belief, degrees of belief, and safe belief
Plausibility models are Kripke models that agents use to reason about
knowledge and belief, both of themselves and of each other. Such models are
used to interpret the notions of conditional belief, degrees of belief, and
safe belief. The logic of conditional belief contains that modality and also
the knowledge modality, and similarly for the logic of degrees of belief and
the logic of safe belief. With respect to these logics, plausibility models may
contain too much information. A proper notion of bisimulation is required that
characterises them. We define that notion of bisimulation and prove the
required characterisations: on the class of image-finite and preimage-finite
models (with respect to the plausibility relation), two pointed Kripke models
are modally equivalent in either of the three logics, if and only if they are
bisimilar. As a result, the information content of such a model can be
similarly expressed in the logic of conditional belief, or the logic of degrees
of belief, or that of safe belief. This, we found a surprising result. Still,
that does not mean that the logics are equally expressive: the logics of
conditional and degrees of belief are incomparable, the logics of degrees of
belief and safe belief are incomparable, while the logic of safe belief is more
expressive than the logic of conditional belief. In view of the result on
bisimulation characterisation, this is an equally surprising result. We hope
our insights may contribute to the growing community of formal epistemology and
on the relation between qualitative and quantitative modelling
Seeing is Believing: Formalising False-Belief Tasks in Dynamic Epistemic Logic
Abstract. In this paper we show how to formalise false-belief tasks like the Sally-Anne task and the second-order chocolate task in Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL). False-belief tasks are used to test the strength of the Theory of Mind (ToM) of humans, that is, a human’s ability to attribute mental states to other agents. Having a ToM is known to be essential to human social intelligence, and hence likely to be essential to social intelligence of artificial agents as well. It is therefore important to find ways of implementing a ToM in artificial agents, and to show that such agents can then solve false-belief tasks. In this paper, the approach is to use DEL as a formal framework for representing ToM, and use reasoning in DEL to solve false-belief tasks. In addition to formalising several false-belief tasks in DEL, the paper introduces some extensions of DEL itself: edge-conditioned event models and observability propositions. These extensions are introduced to provide better formalisations of the false-belief tasks, but expected to have independent future interest.