52,922 research outputs found
Knowledge Base Population using Semantic Label Propagation
A crucial aspect of a knowledge base population system that extracts new
facts from text corpora, is the generation of training data for its relation
extractors. In this paper, we present a method that maximizes the effectiveness
of newly trained relation extractors at a minimal annotation cost. Manual
labeling can be significantly reduced by Distant Supervision, which is a method
to construct training data automatically by aligning a large text corpus with
an existing knowledge base of known facts. For example, all sentences
mentioning both 'Barack Obama' and 'US' may serve as positive training
instances for the relation born_in(subject,object). However, distant
supervision typically results in a highly noisy training set: many training
sentences do not really express the intended relation. We propose to combine
distant supervision with minimal manual supervision in a technique called
feature labeling, to eliminate noise from the large and noisy initial training
set, resulting in a significant increase of precision. We further improve on
this approach by introducing the Semantic Label Propagation method, which uses
the similarity between low-dimensional representations of candidate training
instances, to extend the training set in order to increase recall while
maintaining high precision. Our proposed strategy for generating training data
is studied and evaluated on an established test collection designed for
knowledge base population tasks. The experimental results show that the
Semantic Label Propagation strategy leads to substantial performance gains when
compared to existing approaches, while requiring an almost negligible manual
annotation effort.Comment: Submitted to Knowledge Based Systems, special issue on Knowledge
Bases for Natural Language Processin
Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse
The goal of argumentation mining, an evolving research field in computational
linguistics, is to design methods capable of analyzing people's argumentation.
In this article, we go beyond the state of the art in several ways. (i) We deal
with actual Web data and take up the challenges given by the variety of
registers, multiple domains, and unrestricted noisy user-generated Web
discourse. (ii) We bridge the gap between normative argumentation theories and
argumentation phenomena encountered in actual data by adapting an argumentation
model tested in an extensive annotation study. (iii) We create a new gold
standard corpus (90k tokens in 340 documents) and experiment with several
machine learning methods to identify argument components. We offer the data,
source codes, and annotation guidelines to the community under free licenses.
Our findings show that argumentation mining in user-generated Web discourse is
a feasible but challenging task.Comment: Cite as: Habernal, I. & Gurevych, I. (2017). Argumentation Mining in
User-Generated Web Discourse. Computational Linguistics 43(1), pp. 125-17
- …