19 research outputs found
Complexity Results for Modal Dependence Logic
Modal dependence logic was introduced recently by V\"a\"an\"anen. It enhances
the basic modal language by an operator =(). For propositional variables
p_1,...,p_n, =(p_1,...,p_(n-1);p_n) intuitively states that the value of p_n is
determined by those of p_1,...,p_(n-1). Sevenster (J. Logic and Computation,
2009) showed that satisfiability for modal dependence logic is complete for
nondeterministic exponential time. In this paper we consider fragments of modal
dependence logic obtained by restricting the set of allowed propositional
connectives. We show that satisfibility for poor man's dependence logic, the
language consisting of formulas built from literals and dependence atoms using
conjunction, necessity and possibility (i.e., disallowing disjunction), remains
NEXPTIME-complete. If we only allow monotone formulas (without negation, but
with disjunction), the complexity drops to PSPACE-completeness. We also extend
V\"a\"an\"anen's language by allowing classical disjunction besides dependence
disjunction and show that the satisfiability problem remains NEXPTIME-complete.
If we then disallow both negation and dependence disjunction, satistiability is
complete for the second level of the polynomial hierarchy. In this way we
completely classify the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem
for all restrictions of propositional and dependence operators considered by
V\"a\"an\"anen and Sevenster.Comment: 22 pages, full version of CSL 2010 pape
Complexity of validity for propositional dependence logics
We study the validity problem for propositional dependence logic, modal
dependence logic and extended modal dependence logic. We show that the validity
problem for propositional dependence logic is NEXPTIME-complete. In addition,
we establish that the corresponding problem for modal dependence logic and
extended modal dependence logic is NEXPTIME-hard and in NEXPTIME^NP.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2014, arXiv:1408.556
The Expressive Power of Modal Dependence Logic
We study the expressive power of various modal logics with team semantics. We
show that exactly the properties of teams that are downward closed and closed
under team k-bisimulation, for some finite k, are definable in modal logic
extended with intuitionistic disjunction. Furthermore, we show that the
expressive power of modal logic with intuitionistic disjunction and extended
modal dependence logic coincide. Finally we establish that any translation from
extended modal dependence logic into modal logic with intuitionistic
disjunction increases the size of some formulas exponentially.Comment: 19 page
The expressive power of modal logic with inclusion atoms
Modal inclusion logic is the extension of basic modal logic with inclusion
atoms, and its semantics is defined on Kripke models with teams. A team of a
Kripke model is just a subset of its domain. In this paper we give a complete
characterisation for the expressive power of modal inclusion logic: a class of
Kripke models with teams is definable in modal inclusion logic if and only if
it is closed under k-bisimulation for some integer k, it is closed under
unions, and it has the empty team property. We also prove that the same
expressive power can be obtained by adding a single unary nonemptiness operator
to modal logic. Furthermore, we establish an exponential lower bound for the
size of the translation from modal inclusion logic to modal logic with the
nonemptiness operator.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2015, arXiv:1509.0685
Parametrised Complexity of Model Checking and Satisfiability in Propositional Dependence Logic
In this paper, we initiate a systematic study of the parametrised complexity
in the field of Dependence Logics which finds its origin in the Dependence
Logic of V\"a\"an\"anen from 2007. We study a propositional variant of this
logic (PDL) and investigate a variety of parametrisations with respect to the
central decision problems. The model checking problem (MC) of PDL is
NP-complete. The subject of this research is to identify a list of
parametrisations (formula-size, treewidth, treedepth, team-size, number of
variables) under which MC becomes fixed-parameter tractable. Furthermore, we
show that the number of disjunctions or the arity of dependence atoms
(dep-arity) as a parameter both yield a paraNP-completeness result. Then, we
consider the satisfiability problem (SAT) showing a different picture: under
team-size, or dep-arity SAT is paraNP-complete whereas under all other
mentioned parameters the problem is in FPT. Finally, we introduce a variant of
the satisfiability problem, asking for teams of a given size, and show for this
problem an almost complete picture.Comment: Update includes refined result
Boolean Dependence Logic and Partially-Ordered Connectives
We introduce a new variant of dependence logic called Boolean dependence
logic. In Boolean dependence logic dependence atoms are of the type
=(x_1,...,x_n,\alpha), where \alpha is a Boolean variable. Intuitively, with
Boolean dependence atoms one can express quantification of relations, while
standard dependence atoms express quantification over functions.
We compare the expressive power of Boolean dependence logic to dependence
logic and first-order logic enriched by partially-ordered connectives. We show
that the expressive power of Boolean dependence logic and dependence logic
coincide. We define natural syntactic fragments of Boolean dependence logic and
show that they coincide with the corresponding fragments of first-order logic
enriched by partially-ordered connectives with respect to expressive power. We
then show that the fragments form a strict hierarchy.Comment: 41 page
Complexity of Propositional Logics in Team Semantic
We classify the computational complexity of the satisfiability, validity, and model-checking problems for propositional independence, inclusion, and team logic. Our main result shows that the satisfiability and validity problems for propositional team logic are complete for alternating exponential-time with polynomially many alternations.Peer reviewe
Parameterised Complexity of Propositional Inclusion and Independence Logic
In this work we analyse the parameterised complexity of propositional
inclusion (PINC) and independence logic (PIND). The problems of interest are
model checking (MC) and satisfiability (SAT). The complexity of these problems
is well understood in the classical (non-parameterised) setting. Mahmood and
Meier (FoIKS 2020) recently studied the parameterised complexity of
propositional dependence logic (PDL). As a continuation of their work, we
classify inclusion and independence logic and thereby come closer to completing
the picture with respect to the parametrised complexity for the three most
studied logics in the propositional team semantics setting. We present results
for each problem with respect to 8 different parameterisations. It turns out
that for a team-based logic L such that L-atoms can be evaluated in polynomial
time, then MC parameterised by teamsize is FPT. As a corollary, we get an FPT
membership under the following parameterisations: formula-size, formula-depth,
treewidth, and number of variables. The parameter teamsize shows interesting
behavior for SAT. For PINC, the parameter teamsize is not meaningful, whereas
for PDL and PIND the satisfiability is paraNP-complete. Finally, we prove that
when parameterised by arity, both MC and SAT are paraNP-complete for each of
the considered logics.Comment: A revised versio