Trakhtenbrot's Theorem in Coq, A Constructive Approach to Finite Model Theory

We study finite first-order satisfiability (FSAT) in the constructive setting of dependent type theory. Employing synthetic accounts of enumerability and decidability, we give a full classification of FSAT depending on the first-order signature of non-logical symbols. On the one hand, our development focuses on Trakhtenbrot's theorem, stating that FSAT is undecidable as soon as the signature contains an at least binary relation symbol. Our proof proceeds by a many-one reduction chain starting from the Post correspondence problem. On the other hand, we establish the decidability of FSAT for monadic first-order logic, i.e. where the signature only contains at most unary function and relation symbols, as well as the enumerability of FSAT for arbitrary enumerable signatures. All our results are mechanised in the framework of a growing Coq library of synthetic undecidability proofs

Trakhtenbrot’s Theorem in Coq: A Constructive Approach to Finite Model Theory

International audienceWe study finite first-order satisfiability (FSAT) in the constructive setting of dependent type theory. Employing synthetic accounts of enumerability and decidability, we give a full classification of FSAT depending on the first-order signature of non-logical symbols. On the one hand, our development focuses on Trakhtenbrot's theorem, stating that FSAT is undecidable as soon as the signature contains an at least binary relation symbol. Our proof proceeds by a many-one reduction chain starting from the Post correspondence problem. On the other hand, we establish the decidability of FSAT for monadic first-order logic, i.e. where the signature only contains at most unary function and relation symbols, as well as the enumerability of FSAT for arbitrary enumerable signatures. All our results are mechanised in the framework of a growing Coq library of synthetic undecidability proofs

Synthetic Undecidability and Incompleteness of First-Order Axiom Systems in Coq

We mechanise the undecidability of various frst-order axiom systems in Coq, employing the synthetic approach to computability underlying the growing Coq Library of Undecidability Proofs. Concretely, we cover both semantic and deductive entailment in fragments of Peano arithmetic (PA) as well as ZF and related fnitary set theories, with their undecidability established by many-one reductions from solvability of Diophantine equations, i.e. Hilbert’s tenth problem (H10), and the Post correspondence problem (PCP), respectively. In the synthetic setting based on the computability of all functions defnable in a constructive foundation, such as Coq’s type theory, it sufces to defne these reductions as metalevel functions with no need for further encoding in a formalised model of computation. The concrete cases of PA and the considered set theories are supplemented by a general synthetic theory of undecidable axiomatisations, focusing on well-known connections to consistency and incompleteness. Specifcally, our reductions rely on the existence of standard models, necessitating additional assumptions in the case of full ZF, and all axiomatic extensions still justifed by such standard models are shown incomplete. As a by-product of the undecidability of set theories formulated using only membership and no equality symbol, we obtain the undecidability of frst-order logic with a single binary relation

POPLMark reloaded: Mechanizing proofs by logical relations

We propose a new collection of benchmark problems in mechanizing the metatheory of programming languages, in order to compare and push the state of the art of proof assistants. In particular, we focus on proofs using logical relations (LRs) and propose establishing strong normalization of a simply typed calculus with a proof by Kripke-style LRs as a benchmark. We give a modern view of this well-understood problem by formulating our LR on well-typed terms. Using this case study, we share some of the lessons learned tackling this problem in different dependently typed proof environments. In particular, we consider the mechanization in Beluga, a proof environment that supports higher-order abstract syntax encodings and contrast it to the development and strategies used in general-purpose proof assistants such as Coq and Agda. The goal of this paper is to engage the community in discussions on what support in proof environments is needed to truly bring mechanized metatheory to the masses and engage said community in the crafting of future benchmarks

Engineering formal systems in constructive type theory

This thesis presents a practical methodology for formalizing the meta-theory of formal systems with binders and coinductive relations in constructive type theory. While constructive type theory offers support for reasoning about formal systems built out of inductive definitions, support for syntax with binders and coinductive relations is lacking. We provide this support. We implement syntax with binders using well-scoped de Bruijn terms and parallel substitutions. We solve substitution lemmas automatically using the rewriting theory of the -calculus. We present the Autosubst library to automate our approach in the proof assistant Coq. Our approach to coinductive relations is based on an inductive tower construction, which is a type-theoretic form of transfinite induction. The tower construction allows us to reduce coinduction to induction. This leads to a symmetric treatment of induction and coinduction and allows us to give a novel construction of the companion of a monotone function on a complete lattice. We demonstrate our methods with a series of case studies. In particular, we present a proof of type preservation for CC!, a proof of weak and strong normalization for System F, a proof that systems of weakly guarded equations have unique solutions in CCS, and a compiler verification for a compiler from a non-deterministic language into a deterministic language. All technical results in the thesis are formalized in Coq.In dieser Dissertation beschreiben wir praktische Techniken um Formale Systeme mit Bindern und koinduktiven Relationen in Konstruktiver Typtheorie zu implementieren. Während Konstruktive Typtheorie bereits gute Unterstützung für Induktive Definition bietet, gibt es momentan kaum Unterstützung für syntaktische Systeme mit Bindern, oder koinduktiven Definitionen. Wir kodieren Syntax mit Bindern in Typtheorie mit einer de Bruijn Darstellung und zeigen alle Substitutionslemmas durch Termersetzung mit dem -Kalkül. Wir präsentieren die Autosubst Bibliothek, die unseren Ansatz im Beweisassistenten Coq implementiert. Für koinduktive Relationen verwenden wir eine induktive Turmkonstruktion, welche das typtheoretische Analog zur Transfiniten Induktion darstellt. Auf diese Art erhalten wir neue Beweisprinzipien für Koinduktion und eine neue Konstruktion von Pous’ “companion” einer monotonen Funktion auf einem vollständigen Verband. Wir validieren unsere Methoden an einer Reihe von Fallstudien. Alle technischen Ergebnisse in dieser Dissertation sind mit Coq formalisiert

Formal verification of the equivalence of system F and the pure type system L2

We develop a formal proof of the equivalence of two different variants of System F. The first is close to the original presentation where expressions are separated into distinct syntactic classes of types and terms. The second, L2 (also written as λ2), is a particular pure type system (PTS) where the notions of types and terms, and the associated expressions are unified in a single syntactic class. The employed notion of equivalence is a bidirectional reduction of the respective typing relations. A machine-verified proof of this result turns out to be surprisingly intricate, since the two variants noticeably differ in their expression languages, their type systems and the binding of local variables. Most of this work is executed in the Coq theorem prover and encompasses a general development of the PTS metatheory, an equivalence result for a stratified and a PTS variant of the simply typed λ-calculus as well as the subsequent extension to the full equivalence result for System F. We utilise nameless de Bruijn syntax with parallel substitutions for the representation of variable binding and develop an extended notion of context morphism lemmas as a structured proof method for this setting. We also provide two developments of the equivalence result in the proof systems Abella and Beluga, where we rely on higher-order abstract syntax (HOAS). This allows us to compare the three proof systems, as well as HOAS and de Bruijn for the purpose of developing formal metatheory.Wir präsentieren einen maschinell verifizierten Beweis der Äquivalenz zweier Darstellungen des Lambda-Kalküls System F. Die erste unterscheidet syntaktisch zwischen Termen und Typen und entspricht somit der geläufigen Form. Die zweite, L2 bzw. λ2, ist ein sog. Pure Type System (PTS), bei welchem alle Ausdrücke in einer syntaktischen Klasse zusammen fallen. Unser Äquivalenzbegriff ist eine bidirektionale Reduktion der jeweiligen Typrelationen. Ein formaler Beweis dieser Eigenschaft ist aufgrund der Unterschiede der Ausdruckssprachen, der Typrelationen und der Bindung lokaler Variablen überraschend anspruchsvoll. Der Hauptteil dieser Arbeit wurde in dem Beweisassistenten Coq entwickelt und umfasst eine Abhandlung der PTS Metatheorie, sowie einen Äquivalenzbeweis für das einfach getypte Lambda-Kalkül, welcher dann zu dem vollen Ergebnis für System F skaliert wird. Für die Darstellung lokaler Variablenbindung verwenden wir de Bruijn Syntax, gepaart mit parallelen Substitutionen. Außerdem entwickeln wir eine generalisierte Form von Kontext-Morphismen Lemmas, welche eine strukturierte Beweismethodik in diesem Umfeld liefern. Darüber hinaus betrachten wir zwei weitere Formalisierungen des Äquivalenzresultats in den Beweissystemen Abella und Beluga, welche beide höherstufige abstrakte Syntax (HOAS) zur Darstellung lokaler Bindung verwenden. Dies ermöglicht es uns, sowohl die drei Beweissysteme, als auch den HOAS und den de Bruijn Ansatz mit Hinblick auf die Entwicklung formaler Metatheorie zu vergleichen