Comparison of Eager and Quorum-based Replication in a Cloud Environment

Most applications deployed in a Cloud require a high degree of availability. For the data layer, this means that data have to be replicated either within a data center or across Cloud data centers. While replication also allows to increase the performance of applications if data is read as the load can be distributed across replica sites, updates need special coordination among the sites and may have an adverse effect on the overall performance. The actual effects of data replication depend on the replication protocol used. While ROWAA (readone-write-all-available) prefers read operations, quorum-based replication protocols tend to prefer write operations as not all replica sites need to be updated synchronously. In this paper, we provide a detailed evaluation of ROWAA and quorum-based replication protocols in an amazon AWS Cloud environment on the basis of the TPC-C benchmark and different transaction mixes. The evaluation results for single data center and multi data center environments show that in general the influence of transaction coordination significantly grows with the number of update sites and a growing number of update transactions. However, not all quorum-based protocols are well suited for high update loads as they may create a hot spot that again significantly impacts performance

QuAD: A Quorum Protocol for Adaptive Data Management in the Cloud

More and more companies move their data to the Cloud which is able to cope with the high scalability and availability demands due to its pay-as-you-go cost model. For this, databases in the Cloud are distributed and replicated across different data centers. According to the CAP theorem, distributed data management is governed by a trade-off between consistency and availability. In addition, the stronger the provided consistency level, the higher is the generated coordination overhead and thus the impact on system performance. Nevertheless, many OLTP applications demand strong consistency and use ROWA(A) for replica synchronization. ROWA(A) protocols eagerly update all (or all available) replicas and thus generate a high overhead for update transactions. In contrast, quorum-based protocols consider only a subset of sites for eager commit. This reduces the overhead for update transactions at the cost of reads, as the latter also need to access several sites. Existing quorum-based protocols do not consider the load of sites when determining the quorums; hence, they are not able to adapt at run-time to load changes. In this paper, we present QuAD, an adaptive quorum-based replication protocol that constructs quorums by dynamically selecting the optimal quorum configuration w.r.t. load and network latency. Our evaluation of QuAD based on Amazon EC2 shows that it considerably outperforms both static quorum protocols and dynamic protocols that neglect site properties in the quorum construction process