3 research outputs found

    Development of an enhanced scheme for NEMO environment

    Get PDF
    The frequent change of Mobile Node (MN) location is going to increase rapidly as everything is a mobile presently. In order to achieve seamless mobility, mobility managements are considered as very important. The mobile IPv6 MIPv6 is proposed and standardized by IETF. It is introduced to improve the host mobility management. However, it faces different problems when mobile nodes move between different network infrastructures. To overcome these issues, proxy mobile IPv6 PMIPv6 is introduced. PMIPv6 is a network based mobility management intended to improve handover delay by functioning mobility managements on behalf of mobile node. However, PMIPv6 added additional cost to the network by implementing mobile access gateway and bi-directional tunnel. In addition, network mobility, NEMO standardized as extension to MIPV6 to support session continuity to the internet services on behalf of mobile network nodes. Nevertheless, they still issues of packet loss and handover delay during the registration of MNNs and handoff of NEMO. The research within this area is very active, trying to solve these problems by integration of different mobility managementโ€™s schemes. In this paper, we have focused on evaluating different integrations of mobility managements with NEMO. Then we proposed a BUNSD-LMA schema, to solve the problem of packet loss and handover delay, by integration of PMIPv6 with NEMO BS, using pre-registration of MNP (HNP) in advance with short time in binding update extensions message option format

    An integrated security Protocol communication scheme for Internet of Things using the Locator/ID Separation Protocol Network

    Get PDF
    Internet of Things communication is mainly based on a machine-to-machine pattern, where devices are globally addressed and identified. However, as the number of connected devices increase, the burdens on the network infrastructure increase as well. The major challenges are the size of the routing tables and the efficiency of the current routing protocols in the Internet backbone. To address these problems, an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) working group, along with the research group at Cisco, are still working on the Locator/ID Separation Protocol as a routing architecture that can provide new semantics for the IP addressing, to simplify routing operations and improve scalability in the future of the Internet such as the Internet of Things. Nonetheless, The Locator/ID Separation Protocol is still at an early stage of implementation and the security Protocol e.g. Internet Protocol Security (IPSec), in particular, is still in its infancy. Based on this, three scenarios were considered: Firstly, in the initial stage, each Locator/ID Separation Protocol-capable router needs to register with a Map-Server. This is known as the Registration Stage. Nevertheless, this stage is vulnerable to masquerading and content poisoning attacks. Secondly, the addresses resolving stage, in the Locator/ID Separation Protocol the Map Server (MS) accepts Map-Request from Ingress Tunnel Routers and Egress Tunnel Routers. These routers in trun look up the database and return the requested mapping to the endpoint user. However, this stage lacks data confidentiality and mutual authentication. Furthermore, the Locator/ID Separation Protocol limits the efficiency of the security protocol which works against redirecting the data or acting as fake routers. Thirdly, As a result of the vast increase in the different Internet of Things devices, the interconnected links between these devices increase vastly as well. Thus, the communication between the devices can be easily exposed to disclosures by attackers such as Man in the Middle Attacks (MitM) and Denial of Service Attack (DoS). This research provided a comprehensive study for Communication and Mobility in the Internet of Things as well as the taxonomy of different security protocols. It went on to investigate the security threats and vulnerabilities of Locator/ID Separation Protocol using X.805 framework standard. Then three Security protocols were provided to secure the exchanged transitions of communication in Locator/ID Separation Protocol. The first security protocol had been implemented to secure the Registration stage of Locator/ID separation using ID/Based cryptography method. The second security protocol was implemented to address the Resolving stage in the Locator/ID Separation Protocol between the Ingress Tunnel Router and Egress Tunnel Router using Challenge-Response authentication and Key Agreement technique. Where, the third security protocol had been proposed, analysed and evaluated for the Internet of Things communication devices. This protocol was based on the authentication and the group key agreement via using the El-Gamal concept. The developed protocols set an interface between each level of the phase to achieve security refinement architecture to Internet of Things based on Locator/ID Separation Protocol. These protocols were verified using Automated Validation Internet Security Protocol and Applications (AVISPA) which is a push button tool for the automated validation of security protocols and achieved results demonstrating that they do not have any security flaws. Finally, a performance analysis of security refinement protocol analysis and an evaluation were conducted using Contiki and Cooja simulation tool. The results of the performance analysis showed that the security refinement was highly scalable and the memory was quite efficient as it needed only 72 bytes of memory to store the keys in the Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) device
    corecore