Comparing simple video quality measures for loss-impaired video sequences on a large-scale database

International audienceThe performance of objective video quality measures is usually identified by comparing their predictions to subjective assessment results which are regarded as the ground truth. In this work we propose a complementary approach for this performance evaluation by means of a large-scale database of test sequences evaluated with several objective measurement algorithms. Such an approach is expected to detect performance anomalies that could highlight shortcomings in current objective measurement algorithms. Using realistic coding and network transmission conditions, we investigate the consistency of the prediction of different measures as well as how much their behavior can be predicted by content, coding and transmission features, discussing unexpected and peculiar behaviors, and highlighting how a large-scale database can help in identifying anomalies not easily found by means of subjective testing. We expect that this analysis will shed light on directions to pursue in order to overcome some of the limitations of existing reliability assessment methods for objective video quality measures

Comparing temporal behavior of fast objective video quality measures on a large-scale database

In many application scenarios, video quality assessment is required to be fast and reasonably accurate. The characterisation of objective algorithms by subjective assessment is well established but limited due to the small number of test samples. Verification using large-scale objectively annotated databases provides a complementary solution. In this contribution, three simple but fast measures are compared regarding their agreement on a large-scale database. In contrast to subjective experiments, not only sequence-wise but also framewise agreement can be analyzed. Insight is gained into the behavior of the measures with respect to 5952 different coding configurations of High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC). Consistency within a video sequence is analyzed as well as across video sequences. The results show that the occurrence of discrepancies depends mostly on the configured coding structure and the source content. The detailed observations stimulate questions on the combined usage of several video quality measures for encoder optimization

Reproducible research framework for objective video quality measures using a large-scale database approach

This work presents a framework to facilitate reproducibility of research in video quality evaluation. Its initial version is built around the JEG-Hybrid database of HEVC coded video sequences. The framework is modular, organized in the form of pipelined activities, which range from the tools needed to generate the whole database from reference signals up to the analysis of the video quality measures already present in the database. Researchers can re-run, modify and extend any module, starting from any point in the pipeline, while always achieving perfect reproducibility of the results. The modularity of the structure allows to work on subsets of the database since for some analysis this might be too computationally intensive. To this purpose, the framework also includes a software module to compute interesting subsets, in terms of coding conditions, of the whole database. An example shows how the framework can be used to investigate how the small differences in the definition of the widespread PSNR metric can yield very different results, discussed in more details in our accompanying research paper Aldahdooh et al. (0000). This further underlines the importance of reproducibility to allow comparing different research work with high confidence. To the best of our knowledge, this framework is the first attempt to bring exact reproducibility end-to-end in the context of video quality evaluation research. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V

Framework for reproducible objective video quality research with case study on PSNR implementations

Reproducibility is an important and recurrent issue in objective video quality research because the presented algorithms are complex, depend on specific implementations in software packages or their parameters need to be trained on a particular, sometimes unpublished, dataset. Textual descriptions often lack the required detail and even for the simple Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) several mutations exist for images and videos, in particular considering the choice of the peak value and the temporal pooling. This work presents results achieved through the analysis of objective video quality measures evaluated on a reproducible large scale database containing about 60,000 HEVC coded video sequences. We focus on PSNR, one of the most widespread measures, considering its two most common definitions. The sometimes largely different results achieved by applying the two definitions highlight the importance of the strict reproducibility of the research in video quality evaluation in particular. Reproducibility is also often a question of computational power and PSNR is a computationally inexpensive algorithm running faster than realtime. Complex algorithms cannot be reasonably developed and evaluated on the abovementioned 160 hours of video sequences. Therefore, techniques to select subsets of coding parameters are then introduced. Results show that an accurate selection can preserve the variety of the results seen on the large database but with much lower complexity. Finally, note that our SoftwareX accompanying paper presents the software framework which allows the full reproducibility of all the research results presented here, as well as how the same framework can be used to produce derived work for other measures or indexes proposed by other researchers which we strongly encourage for integration in our open framework

Movie Description

Audio Description (AD) provides linguistic descriptions of movies and allows visually impaired people to follow a movie along with their peers. Such descriptions are by design mainly visual and thus naturally form an interesting data source for computer vision and computational linguistics. In this work we propose a novel dataset which contains transcribed ADs, which are temporally aligned to full length movies. In addition we also collected and aligned movie scripts used in prior work and compare the two sources of descriptions. In total the Large Scale Movie Description Challenge (LSMDC) contains a parallel corpus of 118,114 sentences and video clips from 202 movies. First we characterize the dataset by benchmarking different approaches for generating video descriptions. Comparing ADs to scripts, we find that ADs are indeed more visual and describe precisely what is shown rather than what should happen according to the scripts created prior to movie production. Furthermore, we present and compare the results of several teams who participated in a challenge organized in the context of the workshop "Describing and Understanding Video & The Large Scale Movie Description Challenge (LSMDC)", at ICCV 2015