84,162 research outputs found
Learning to Rank Academic Experts in the DBLP Dataset
Expert finding is an information retrieval task that is concerned with the
search for the most knowledgeable people with respect to a specific topic, and
the search is based on documents that describe people's activities. The task
involves taking a user query as input and returning a list of people who are
sorted by their level of expertise with respect to the user query. Despite
recent interest in the area, the current state-of-the-art techniques lack in
principled approaches for optimally combining different sources of evidence.
This article proposes two frameworks for combining multiple estimators of
expertise. These estimators are derived from textual contents, from
graph-structure of the citation patterns for the community of experts, and from
profile information about the experts. More specifically, this article explores
the use of supervised learning to rank methods, as well as rank aggregation
approaches, for combing all of the estimators of expertise. Several supervised
learning algorithms, which are representative of the pointwise, pairwise and
listwise approaches, were tested, and various state-of-the-art data fusion
techniques were also explored for the rank aggregation framework. Experiments
that were performed on a dataset of academic publications from the Computer
Science domain attest the adequacy of the proposed approaches.Comment: Expert Systems, 2013. arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:1302.041
Assessing similarity of feature selection techniques in high-dimensional domains
Recent research efforts attempt to combine multiple feature selection techniques instead of using a single one. However, this combination is often made on an “ad hoc” basis, depending on the specific problem at hand, without considering the degree of diversity/similarity of the involved methods. Moreover, though it is recognized that different techniques may return quite dissimilar outputs, especially in high dimensional/small sample size domains, few direct comparisons exist that quantify these differences and their implications on classification performance. This paper aims to provide a contribution in this direction by proposing a general methodology for assessing the similarity between the outputs of different feature selection methods in high dimensional classification problems. Using as benchmark the genomics domain, an empirical study has been conducted to compare some of the most popular feature selection methods, and useful insight has been obtained about their pattern of agreement
Deep Multi-view Learning to Rank
We study the problem of learning to rank from multiple information sources.
Though multi-view learning and learning to rank have been studied extensively
leading to a wide range of applications, multi-view learning to rank as a
synergy of both topics has received little attention. The aim of the paper is
to propose a composite ranking method while keeping a close correlation with
the individual rankings simultaneously. We present a generic framework for
multi-view subspace learning to rank (MvSL2R), and two novel solutions are
introduced under the framework. The first solution captures information of
feature mappings from within each view as well as across views using
autoencoder-like networks. Novel feature embedding methods are formulated in
the optimization of multi-view unsupervised and discriminant autoencoders.
Moreover, we introduce an end-to-end solution to learning towards both the
joint ranking objective and the individual rankings. The proposed solution
enhances the joint ranking with minimum view-specific ranking loss, so that it
can achieve the maximum global view agreements in a single optimization
process. The proposed method is evaluated on three different ranking problems,
i.e. university ranking, multi-view lingual text ranking and image data
ranking, providing superior results compared to related methods.Comment: Published at IEEE TKD
Large-scale Multi-label Text Classification - Revisiting Neural Networks
Neural networks have recently been proposed for multi-label classification
because they are able to capture and model label dependencies in the output
layer. In this work, we investigate limitations of BP-MLL, a neural network
(NN) architecture that aims at minimizing pairwise ranking error. Instead, we
propose to use a comparably simple NN approach with recently proposed learning
techniques for large-scale multi-label text classification tasks. In
particular, we show that BP-MLL's ranking loss minimization can be efficiently
and effectively replaced with the commonly used cross entropy error function,
and demonstrate that several advances in neural network training that have been
developed in the realm of deep learning can be effectively employed in this
setting. Our experimental results show that simple NN models equipped with
advanced techniques such as rectified linear units, dropout, and AdaGrad
perform as well as or even outperform state-of-the-art approaches on six
large-scale textual datasets with diverse characteristics.Comment: 16 pages, 4 figures, submitted to ECML 201
BoostFM: Boosted Factorization Machines for Top-N Feature-based Recommendation
Feature-based matrix factorization techniques such as Factorization Machines (FM) have been proven to achieve impressive accuracy for the rating prediction task. However, most common recommendation scenarios are formulated as a top-N item ranking problem with implicit feedback (e.g., clicks, purchases)rather than explicit ratings. To address this problem, with both implicit feedback and feature information, we propose a feature-based collaborative boosting recommender called BoostFM, which integrates boosting into factorization models during the process of item ranking. Specifically, BoostFM is an adaptive boosting framework that linearly combines multiple homogeneous component recommenders, which are repeatedly constructed on the basis of the individual FM model by a re-weighting scheme. Two ways are proposed to efficiently train the component recommenders from the perspectives of both pairwise and listwise Learning-to-Rank (L2R). The properties of our proposed method are empirically studied on three real-world datasets. The experimental results show that BoostFM outperforms a number of state-of-the-art approaches for top-N recommendation
- …