56,361 research outputs found

    The Number of Triangles Needed to Span a Polygon Embedded in R^d

    Full text link
    Given a closed polygon P having n edges, embedded in R^d, we give upper and lower bounds for the minimal number of triangles t needed to form a triangulated PL surface in R^d having P as its geometric boundary. The most interesting case is dimension 3, where the polygon may be knotted. We use the Seifert suface construction to show there always exists an embedded surface requiring at most 7n^2 triangles. We complement this result by showing there are polygons in R^3 for which any embedded surface requires at least 1/2n^2 - O(n) triangles. In dimension 2 only n-2 triangles are needed, and in dimensions 5 or more there exists an embedded surface requiring at most n triangles. In dimension 4 we obtain a partial answer, with an O(n^2) upper bound for embedded surfaces, and a construction of an immersed disk requiring at most 3n triangles. These results can be interpreted as giving qualitiative discrete analogues of the isoperimetric inequality for piecewise linear manifolds.Comment: 16 pages, 4 figures. This paper is a retitled, revised version of math.GT/020217

    Nowhere Dense Graph Classes and Dimension

    Full text link
    Nowhere dense graph classes provide one of the least restrictive notions of sparsity for graphs. Several equivalent characterizations of nowhere dense classes have been obtained over the years, using a wide range of combinatorial objects. In this paper we establish a new characterization of nowhere dense classes, in terms of poset dimension: A monotone graph class is nowhere dense if and only if for every h1h \geq 1 and every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, posets of height at most hh with nn elements and whose cover graphs are in the class have dimension O(nϵ)\mathcal{O}(n^{\epsilon}).Comment: v4: Minor changes suggested by a refere

    SqFreeEVAL: An (almost) optimal real-root isolation algorithm

    Full text link
    Let f be a univariate polynomial with real coefficients, f in R[X]. Subdivision algorithms based on algebraic techniques (e.g., Sturm or Descartes methods) are widely used for isolating the real roots of f in a given interval. In this paper, we consider a simple subdivision algorithm whose primitives are purely numerical (e.g., function evaluation). The complexity of this algorithm is adaptive because the algorithm makes decisions based on local data. The complexity analysis of adaptive algorithms (and this algorithm in particular) is a new challenge for computer science. In this paper, we compute the size of the subdivision tree for the SqFreeEVAL algorithm. The SqFreeEVAL algorithm is an evaluation-based numerical algorithm which is well-known in several communities. The algorithm itself is simple, but prior attempts to compute its complexity have proven to be quite technical and have yielded sub-optimal results. Our main result is a simple O(d(L+ln d)) bound on the size of the subdivision tree for the SqFreeEVAL algorithm on the benchmark problem of isolating all real roots of an integer polynomial f of degree d and whose coefficients can be written with at most L bits. Our proof uses two amortization-based techniques: First, we use the algebraic amortization technique of the standard Mahler-Davenport root bounds to interpret the integral in terms of d and L. Second, we use a continuous amortization technique based on an integral to bound the size of the subdivision tree. This paper is the first to use the novel analysis technique of continuous amortization to derive state of the art complexity bounds

    Bounds on the Coefficients of Tension and Flow Polynomials

    Full text link
    The goal of this article is to obtain bounds on the coefficients of modular and integral flow and tension polynomials of graphs. To this end we make use of the fact that these polynomials can be realized as Ehrhart polynomials of inside-out polytopes. Inside-out polytopes come with an associated relative polytopal complex and, for a wide class of inside-out polytopes, we show that this complex has a convex ear decomposition. This leads to the desired bounds on the coefficients of these polynomials.Comment: 16 page
    corecore