399 research outputs found

    Distributed Path Planning Classification with Web-based 3D Visualization using Deep Neural Network for Internet of Robotic Things

    Get PDF
    Internet of Robotic Things (IoRT) distributes heterogeneous intelligences among devices and platforms. A distributed control of a three-degree-of-freedom (3-DOF) robot manipulator is integrated with web-based 3D visualization. An asynchronous protocol was utilized to broadcast kinematic data of a 3-DOF robot manipulator between platforms. However, kinematic data computed using inverse kinematic equations directly cannot identify the singularity issue of robot manipulator. Singularity avoidance required to prevent robot component or joint from damage. Therefore, this study proposed a deep neural network approach as a classification-based of manipulator robot path planning to avoid singularity issues. Deep neural network (DNN) was trained in 12 minutes, 52 seconds in 500 iterations. Training accuracy measured with value 96,23 percent, validation accuracy measured with value 96,13 percent, and testing accuracy measured with value 96,48 percent Additionally, 3 DOF manipulator robot web-based 3D visualization was made using Web Graphics Library (WebGL). The distributed platform was tested successfully and can distribute and classify 2352 motions per second

    ์•ˆ์ „ํ•œ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋กœ๋ด‡ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ: ์„ค๊ณ„, ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ˜• ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๊ณ„ํš

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2020. 8. ๋ฐ•์ข…์šฐ.The next generation of robots are being asked to work in close proximity to humans. At the same time, the robot should have the ability to change its topology to flexibly cope with various tasks. To satisfy these two requirements, we propose a novel modular reconfi gurable robot and accompanying software architecture, together with real-time motion planning algorithms to allow for safe operation in unstructured dynamic environments with humans. Two of the key innovations behind our modular manipulator design are a genderless connector and multi-dof modules. By making the modules connectable regardless of the input/output directions, a genderless connector increases the number of possible connections. The developed genderless connector can transmit as much load as necessary to an industrial robot. In designing two-dof modules, an offset between two joints is imposed to improve the overall integration and the safety of the modules. To cope with the complexity in modeling due to the genderless connector and multi-dof modules, a programming architecture for modular robots is proposed. The key feature of the proposed architecture is that it efficiently represents connections of multi-dof modules only with connections between modules, while existing architectures should explicitly represent all connections between links and joints. The data structure of the proposed architecture contains properties of tree-structured multi-dof modules with intra-module relations. Using the data structure and connection relations between modules, kinematic/dynamic parameters of connected modules can be obtained through forward recursion. For safe operation of modular robots, real-time robust collision avoidance algorithms for kinematic singularities are proposed. The main idea behind the algorithms is generating control inputs that increase the directional manipulability of the robot to the object direction by reducing directional safety measures. While existing directional safety measures show undesirable behaviors in the vicinity of the kinematic singularities, the proposed geometric safety measure generates stable control inputs in the entire joint space. By adding the preparatory input from the geometric safety measure to the repulsive input, a hierarchical collision avoidance algorithm that is robust to kinematic singularity is implemented. To mathematically guarantee the safety of the robot, another collision avoidance algorithm using the invariance control framework with velocity-dependent safety constraints is proposed. When the object approached the robot from a singular direction, the safety constraints are not satis ed in the initial state of the robot and the safety cannot be guaranteed using the invariance control. By proposing a control algorithm that quickly decreases the preparatory constraints below thresholds, the robot re-enters the constraint set and avoids collisions using the invariance control framework. The modularity and safety of the developed reconfi gurable robot is validated using a set of simulations and hardware experiments. The kinematic/dynamic model of the assembled robot is obtained in real-time and used to accurately control the robot. Due to the safe design of modules with o sets and the high-level safety functions with collision avoidance algorithms, the developed recon figurable robot has a broader safe workspace and wider ranger of safe operation speed than those of cooperative robots.๋‹ค์Œ ์„ธ๋Œ€์˜ ๋กœ๋ด‡์€ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๊ณผ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์ด์—์„œ ํ˜‘์—…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์•ผํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ์™€ ๋™์‹œ์—, ๋กœ๋ด‡์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์œ ์—ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋Œ€์ฒ˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ž์‹ ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”๊พธ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์š”๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ชจ๋“ˆ๋ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณผ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ณ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ , ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์•ˆ์ „ํ•œ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์šด์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹ค์‹œํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๊ณ„ํš ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ๋ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ํ˜์‹ ์„ฑ์€ ๋ฌด์„ฑ๋ณ„ ์ปค๋„ฅํ„ฐ์™€ ๋‹ค์ž์œ ๋„ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์—์„œ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ž…๋ ฅ/์ถœ๋ ฅ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์— ์ƒ๊ด€ ์—†์ด ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์ด ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ๋ฌด์„ฑ๋ณ„ ์ปค๋„ฅํ„ฐ๋Š” ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋Š˜๋ฆด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๋ฌด์„ฑ๋ณ„ ์ปค๋„ฅํ„ฐ๋Š” ์‚ฐ์—…์šฉ ๋กœ๋ด‡์—์„œ ์š”๊ตฌ๋˜๋Š” ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ๋ถ€ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒฌ๋”œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. 2 ์ž์œ ๋„ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„์—์„œ ๋‘ ์ถ• ์‚ฌ์ด์— ์˜คํ”„์…‹์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋„๋ก ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ „์ฒด์ ์ธ ์™„์„ฑ๋„ ๋ฐ ์•ˆ์ „๋„๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด์„ฑ๋ณ„ ์ปค๋„ฅํ„ฐ์™€ ๋‹ค์ž์œ ๋„ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์˜ ๋ณต์žก์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€์‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ๋ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ณ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ชจ๋“ˆ๋ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋ชจ๋“  ๋งํฌ์™€ ์กฐ์ธํŠธ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณ„๋„๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์•ผํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ, ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ณ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“ˆ๋“ค ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๊ด€๊ณ„๋งŒ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ„์œผ๋กœ์จ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ๋‹ค์ž์œ ๋„ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํŠน์ง•์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ํŠธ๋ฆฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋‹ค์ž์œ ๋„ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์˜ ์„ฑ์งˆ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋“ˆ๋“ค ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ตฌํ•™/๋™์—ญํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป์–ด๋‚ด๋Š” ์ˆœ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์žฌ๊ท€ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋“ˆ๋ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์•ˆ์ „ํ•œ ์šด์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๊ธฐ๊ตฌํ•™์  ํŠน์ด์ ์— ๊ฐ•๊ฑดํ•œ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ถฉ๋ŒํšŒํ”ผ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ฑ ์•ˆ์ „๋„๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์ œ์–ด ์ž…๋ ฅ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ์˜ ๋กœ๋ด‡ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ฑ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋Ÿฌ๋นŒ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ฑ ์•ˆ์ „๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ธฐ๊ตฌํ•™์  ํŠน์ด์  ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์—์„œ ์›ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์„ฑ์งˆ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€๋กœ, ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ „๋„๋Š” ์ „์ฒด ์กฐ์ธํŠธ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ ์ œ์–ด ์ž…๋ ฅ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ „๋„๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ธฐ๊ตฌํ•™์  ํŠน์ด์ ์— ๊ฐ•๊ฑดํ•œ ๊ณ„์ธต์  ์ถฉ๋ŒํšŒํ”ผ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์•ˆ์ „๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ƒ๋Œ€์†๋„์— ์ข…์†์ ์ธ ์•ˆ์ „ ์ œ์•ฝ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ๋ถˆ๋ณ€ ์ œ์–ด ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋˜ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ ํšŒํ”ผ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ํŠน์ด์  ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋กœ๋ด‡์— ์ ‘๊ทผํ•  ๋•Œ, ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ์•ˆ์ „ ์ œ์•ฝ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์–ด ๋ถˆ๋ณ€์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ค€๋น„ ์ œ์•ฝ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ž„๊ณ„์  ์•„๋ž˜๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ๋กœ๋ด‡์€ ์ œ์•ฝ์กฐ๊ฑด ์ง‘ํ•ฉ์— ๋‹ค์‹œ ๋“ค์–ด๊ฐ€๊ณ  ๋ถˆ๋ณ€ ์ œ์–ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถฉ๋Œ์„ ํšŒํ”ผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ๋ผ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ์™€ ์•ˆ์ „๋„๋Š” ์ผ๋ จ์˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ๋ฆฝ๋œ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ตฌํ•™/๋™์—ญํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์–ป์–ด๋‚ด ์ •๋ฐ€ ์ œ์–ด์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•ˆ์ „ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ ๋””์ž์ธ๊ณผ ์ถฉ๋Œ ํšŒํ”ผ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ณ ์ฐจ์› ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋กœ๋ด‡์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ํ˜‘๋™๋กœ๋ด‡๋ณด๋‹ค ๋„“์€ ์•ˆ์ „ํ•œ ์ž‘์—…๊ณต๊ฐ„๊ณผ ์ž‘์—…์†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„๋‹ค.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Modularity and Recon gurability 1 1.2 Safe Interaction 4 1.3 Contributions of This Thesis 9 1.3.1 A Recon gurable Modular Robot System with Bidirectional Modules 9 1.3.2 A Modular Robot Software Programming Architecture 10 1.3.3 Anticipatory Collision Avoidance Planning 11 1.4 Organization of This Thesis 14 2 Design and Prototyping of the ModMan 17 2.1 Genderless Connector 18 2.2 Modules for ModMan 21 2.2.1 Joint Modules 21 2.2.2 Link and Gripper Modules 25 2.3 Experiments 26 2.3.1 System Setup 26 2.3.2 Repeatability Comparison with Non-recon gurable Robot Manipulators 28 2.3.3 E ect of the O set in Two-dof Modules 30 2.4 Conclusion 32 3 A Programming Architecture for Modular Recon gurable Robots 33 3.1 Data Structure for Multi-dof Joint Modules 34 3.2 Automatic Kinematic Modeling 37 3.3 Automatic Dynamic Modeling 40 3.4 Flexibility in Manipulator 42 3.5 Experiments 45 3.5.1 System Setup 46 3.5.2 Recon gurability 46 3.5.3 Pick-and-Place with Vision Sensors 48 3.6 Conclusion 49 4 A Preparatory Safety Measure for Robust Collision Avoidance 51 4.1 Preliminaries on Manipulability and Safety 52 4.2 Analysis on Reected Mass 56 4.3 Manipulability Control on S+(1;m) 60 4.3.1 Geometry of the Group of Positive Semi-de nite Matrices 60 4.3.2 Rank-One Manipulability Control 63 4.4 Collision Avoidance with Preparatory Action 65 4.4.1 Repulsive and Preparatory Potential Functions 65 4.4.2 Hierarchical Control and Task Relaxation 67 4.5 Experiments 70 4.5.1 Manipulability Control 71 4.5.2 Collision Avoidance 75 4.6 Conclusion 82 5 Collision Avoidance with Velocity-Dependent Constraints 85 5.1 Input-Output Linearization 87 5.2 Invariance Control 89 5.3 Velocity-Dependent Constraints for Robot Safety 90 5.3.1 Velocity-Dependent Repulsive Constraints 90 5.3.2 Preparatory Constraints 92 5.3.3 Corrective Control for Dangerous Initial State 93 5.4 Experiment 95 5.5 Conclusion 98 6 Conclusion 101 6.1 Overview of This Thesis 101 6.2 Future Work 104 Appendix A Appendix 107 A.1 Preliminaries on Graph Theory 107 A.2 Lie-Theoretic Formulations of Robot Kinematics and Dynamics 108 A.3 Derivatives of Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues 110 A.4 Proof of Proposition Proposition 4.1 111 A.5 Proof of Triangle Inequality When p = 1 114 A.6 Detailed Conditions for a Danger Field 115 Bibliography 117 Abstract 127Docto

    ๊ธฐ๊ตฌํ•™์  ๋ฐ ๋™์  ์ œํ•œ์กฐ๊ฑด๋“ค์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์ž‘์—… ์ค‘์‹ฌ ์ „์‹  ๋™์ž‘ ์ƒ์„ฑ ์ „๋žต

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€(์ง€๋Šฅํ˜•์œตํ•ฉ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ „๊ณต), 2023. 2. ๋ฐ•์žฌํฅ.๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์— ์žฅ์ฐฉ๋œ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ๊ณ ์ •ํ˜• ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์ด๋™์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณต๋ฐ›๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์ „์‹ ์„ ๊ณ„ํšํ•˜๊ณ  ์ œ์–ดํ•  ๋•Œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํŠน์ง•์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํŠน์ง•๋“ค์€ ์—ฌ์ž์œ ๋„, ๋‘ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๊ด€์„ฑ ์ฐจ์ด ๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ๋น„ํ™€๋กœ๋…ธ๋ฏน ์ œํ•œ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋“ฑ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๊ธฐ๊ตฌํ•™์  ๋ฐ ๋™์  ์ œํ•œ์กฐ๊ฑด๋“ค์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์ „์‹  ๋™์ž‘ ์ƒ์„ฑ ์ „๋žต์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ ๋ฌธ์„ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ „์‹  ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋Š” ๋กœ๋ด‡๊ณผ ๋ฌธ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ƒ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๊ตฌํ•™์  ์ œํ•œ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋Š” ๋‘ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์ณ ์ „์‹ ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์–ป์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์ž์„ธ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์™€ ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ฐ๋„ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ํƒ์ƒ‰์—์„œ area indicator๋ผ๋Š” ์ •์ˆ˜ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ƒํƒœ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ๋กœ์„œ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ฌธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์ƒ๋Œ€์  ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์™€ ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ฐ๋„๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฌธ์˜ ์†์žก์ด ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ญ๊ธฐ๊ตฌํ•™์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์€ ๋น„ํ™€๋กœ๋…ธ๋ฏน ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ์‹ค์ œ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜ ์งธ, ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœํ•œ ์ „์‹  ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋“ฑ์‹ ๋ฐ ๋ถ€๋“ฑ์‹ ์ œํ•œ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ชจ๋‘์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฐ€์ค‘ ํ–‰๋ ฌ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•œ ๊ณ„์ธต์  ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ ๋˜๋Š” ํœด๋จธ๋…ธ์ด๋“œ์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ์ž์œ ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์€ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์—ฌ์ž์œ ๋„๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์–ด ์ž‘์—… ์šฐ์„  ์ˆœ์œ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋™์ž‘์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๊ฐ€์ค‘ ํ–‰๋ ฌ์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ 1์ฐจ ์ตœ์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, Active-set ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋“ฑ์‹ ๋ฐ ๋ถ€๋“ฑ์‹ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋Œ€์นญ์ ์ธ ์˜๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์‚ฌ์˜ ํ–‰๋ ฌ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์ƒ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋กœ๋ด‡์€ ์šฐ์„  ์ˆœ์œ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „์‹  ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์˜ ํšจ์šฉ์„ฑ์€ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ํœด๋จธ๋…ธ์ด๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๋™์  ์ œํ•œ์กฐ๊ฑด๋“ค ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋กœ์„œ ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ถฉ๋Œ ํšŒํ”ผ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ถฉ๋Œ์— ์ค‘์ ์„ ๋‘ก๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ๋ฒ„ํผ ์˜์—ญ์„ ๋‘˜๋Ÿฌ์‹ธ๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณก๋ฉด์ธ distance buffer border์˜ ๊ฐœ๋…์„ ์ •์˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฒ„ํผ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๋‘๊ป˜๋Š” ๋ฒ„ํผ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ฒ„ํผ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž‘์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ฆ‰ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ๋ฒ„ํผ ์˜์—ญ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์— ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ „๋žต์€ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฒ„ํผ ์˜์—ญ ๋ฐ–์œผ๋กœ ๋‚ด๋ณด๋‚ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋ฆฌ ์ •์˜๋œ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ ๋„ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡๊ณผ์˜ ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ถฉ๋Œ์„ ํ”ผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์€ ๊ฐ€์ƒ์˜ ํž˜์„ ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ํž˜์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์€ ์ฐจ๋™ ๊ตฌ๋™ ์ด๋™ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ๋น„ํ™€๋กœ๋…ธ๋ฏน ์ œ์•ฝ ๋ฐ ์กฐ์ž‘๊ธฐ์˜ ๋„๋‹ฌ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ 7์ž์œ ๋„ ๋กœ๋ด‡ํŒ”์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ฐจ๋™ ๊ตฌ๋™ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์—์„œ ์ž…์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.A mobile manipulator is a manipulator mounted on a mobile robot. Compared to a fixed-base manipulator, the mobile manipulator can perform various and complex tasks because the mobility is offered by the mobile robot. However, combining two different systems causes several features to be considered when generating the whole-body motion of the mobile manipulator. The features include redundancy, inertia difference, and non-holonomic constraint. The purpose of this thesis is to propose the whole-body motion generation strategy of the mobile manipulator for considering kinematic and dynamic constraints. First, a planning framework is proposed that computes a path for the whole-body configuration of the mobile manipulator to navigate from the initial position, traverse through the door, and arrive at the target position. The framework handles the kinematic constraint imposed by the closed-chain between the robot and door. The proposed framework obtains the path of the whole-body configuration in two steps. First, the path for the pose of the mobile robot and the path for the door angle are computed by using the graph search algorithm. In graph search, an integer variable called area indicator is introduced as an element of state, which indicates where the robot is located relative to the door. Especially, the area indicator expresses a process of door traversal. In the second step, the configuration of the manipulator is computed by the inverse kinematics (IK) solver from the path of the mobile robot and door angle. The proposed framework has a distinct advantage over the existing methods that manually determine several parameters such as which direction to approach the door and the angle of the door required for passage. The effectiveness of the proposed framework was validated through experiments with a nonholonomic mobile manipulator. Second, a whole-body controller is presented based on the optimization method that can consider both equality and inequality constraints. The method computes the optimal solution of the weighted hierarchical optimization problem. The method is developed to resolve the redundancy of robots with a large number of Degrees of Freedom (DOFs), such as a mobile manipulator or a humanoid, so that they can execute multiple tasks with differently weighted joint motion for each task priority. The proposed method incorporates the weighting matrix into the first-order optimality condition of the optimization problem and leverages an active-set method to handle equality and inequality constraints. In addition, it is computationally efficient because the solution is calculated in a weighted joint space with symmetric null-space projection matrices for propagating recursively to a low priority task. Consequently, robots that utilize the proposed controller effectively show whole-body motions handling prioritized tasks with differently weighted joint spaces. The effectiveness of the proposed controller was validated through experiments with a nonholonomic mobile manipulator as well as a humanoid. Lastly, as one of dynamic constraints for the mobile manipulator, a reactive self-collision avoidance algorithm is developed. The proposed method mainly focuses on self-collision between a manipulator and the mobile robot. We introduce the concept of a distance buffer border (DBB), which is a 3D curved surface enclosing a buffer region of the mobile robot. The region has the thickness equal to buffer distance. When the distance between the manipulator and mobile robot is less than the buffer distance, i.e. the manipulator lies inside the buffer region of the mobile robot, the proposed strategy is to move the mobile robot away from the manipulator in order for the manipulator to be placed outside the border of the region, the DBB. The strategy is achieved by exerting force on the mobile robot. Therefore, the manipulator can avoid self-collision with the mobile robot without modifying the predefined motion of the manipulator in a world Cartesian coordinate frame. In particular, the direction of the force is determined by considering the non-holonomic constraint of the differentially driven mobile robot. Additionally, the reachability of the manipulator is considered to arrive at a configuration in which the manipulator can be more maneuverable. To realize the desired force and resulting torque, an avoidance task is constructed by converting them into the accelerations of the mobile robot and smoothly inserted with a top priority into the controller. The proposed algorithm was implemented on a differentially driven mobile robot with a 7-DOFs robotic arm and its performance was demonstrated in various experimental scenarios.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Contributions of thesis 2 1.3 Overview of thesis 3 2 WHOLE-BODY MOTION PLANNER : APPLICATION TO NAVIGATION INCLUDING DOOR TRAVERSAL 5 2.1 Background & related works 7 2.2 Proposed framework 9 2.2.1 Computing path for mobile robot and door angle - S1 10 2.2.1.1 State 10 2.2.1.2 Action 13 2.2.1.3 Cost 15 2.2.1.4 Search 18 2.2.2 Computing path for arm configuration - S2 20 2.3 Results 21 2.3.1 Application to pull and push-type door 21 2.3.2 Experiment in cluttered environment 22 2.3.3 Experiment with different robot platform 23 2.3.4 Comparison with separate planning by existing works 24 2.3.5 Experiment with real robot 29 2.4 Conclusion 29 3 WHOLE-BODY CONTROLLER : WEIGHTED HIERARCHICAL QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING 31 3.1 Related works 32 3.2 Problem statement 34 3.2.1 Pseudo-inverse with weighted least-squares norm for each task 35 3.2.2 Problem statement 37 3.3 WHQP with equality constraints 37 3.4 WHQP with inequality constraints 45 3.5 Experimental results 48 3.5.1 Simulation experiment with nonholonomic mobile manipulator 48 3.5.1.1 Scenario description 48 3.5.1.2 Task and weighting matrix description 49 3.5.1.3 Results 51 3.5.2 Real experiment with nonholonomic mobile manipulator 53 3.5.2.1 Scenario description 53 3.5.2.2 Task and weighting matrix description 53 3.5.2.3 Results 54 3.5.3 Real experiment with humanoid 55 3.5.3.1 Scenario description 55 3.5.3.2 Task and weighting matrix description 55 3.5.3.3 Results 57 3.6 Discussions and implementation details 57 3.6.1 Computation cost 57 3.6.2 Composite weighting matrix in same hierarchy 59 3.6.3 Nullity of WHQP 59 3.7 Conclusion 59 4 WHOLE-BODY CONSTRAINT : SELF-COLLISION AVOIDANCE 61 4.1 Background & related Works 64 4.2 Distance buffer border and its score computation 65 4.2.1 Identification of potentially colliding link pairs 66 4.2.2 Distance buffer border 67 4.2.3 Evaluation of distance buffer border 69 4.2.3.1 Singularity of the differentially driven mobile robot 69 4.2.3.2 Reachability of the manipulator 72 4.2.3.3 Score of the DBB 74 4.3 Self-collision avoidance algorithm 75 4.3.1 Generation of the acceleration for the mobile robot 76 4.3.2 Generation of the repulsive acceleration for the other link pair 82 4.3.3 Construction of an acceleration-based task for self-collision avoidance 83 4.3.4 Insertion of the task in HQP-based controller 83 4.4 Experimental results 86 4.4.1 System overview 87 4.4.2 Experimental results 87 4.4.2.1 Self-collision avoidance while tracking the predefined trajectory 87 4.4.2.2 Self-collision avoidance while manually guiding the end-effector 89 4.4.2.3 Extension to obstacle avoidance when opening the refrigerator 91 4.4.3 Discussion 94 4.5 Conclusion 95 5 CONCLUSIONS 97 Abstract (In Korean) 113 Acknowlegement 116๋ฐ•

    Configuration control of seven-degree-of-freedom arms

    Get PDF
    A seven degree of freedom robot arm with a six degree of freedom end effector is controlled by a processor employing a 6 by 7 Jacobian matrix for defining location and orientation of the end effector in terms of the rotation angles of the joints, a 1 (or more) by 7 Jacobian matrix for defining 1 (or more) user specified kinematic functions constraining location or movement of selected portions of the arm in terms of the joint angles, the processor combining the two Jacobian matrices to produce an augmented 7 (or more) by 7 Jacobian matrix, the processor effecting control by computing in accordance with forward kinematics from the augmented 7 by 7 Jacobian matrix and from the seven joint angles of the arm a set of seven desired joint angles for transmittal to the joint servo loops of the arm. One of the kinematic functions constraints the orientation of the elbow plane of the arm. Another one of the kinematic functions minimizes a sum of gravitational torques on the joints. Still another kinematic function constrains the location of the arm to perform collision avoidance. Generically, one kinematic function minimizes a sum of selected mechanical parameters of at least some of the joints associated with weighting coefficients which may be changed during arm movement. The mechanical parameters may be velocity errors or gravity torques associated with individual joints

    Efficient Learning of Fast Inverse Kinematics with Collision Avoidance

    Full text link
    Fast inverse kinematics (IK) is a central component in robotic motion planning. For complex robots, IK methods are often based on root search and non-linear optimization algorithms. These algorithms can be massively sped up using a neural network to predict a good initial guess, which can then be refined in a few numerical iterations. Besides previous work on learning-based IK, we present a learning approach for the fundamentally more complex problem of IK with collision avoidance. We do this in diverse and previously unseen environments. From a detailed analysis of the IK learning problem, we derive a network and unsupervised learning architecture that removes the need for a sample data generation step. Using the trained network's prediction as an initial guess for a two-stage Jacobian-based solver allows for fast and accurate computation of the collision-free IK. For the humanoid robot, Agile Justin (19 DoF), the collision-free IK is solved in less than 10 milliseconds (on a single CPU core) and with an accuracy of 10^-4 m and 10^-3 rad based on a high-resolution world model generated from the robot's integrated 3D sensor. Our method massively outperforms a random multi-start baseline in a benchmark with the 19 DoF humanoid and challenging 3D environments. It requires ten times less training time than a supervised training method while achieving comparable results.Comment: Presented at the 2023 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robot

    Recurrent Neural Networks-Based Collision-Free Motion Planning for Dual Manipulators Under Multiple Constraints

    Get PDF
    Dual robotic manipulators are robotic systems that are developed to imitate human arms, which shows great potential in performing complex tasks. Collision-free motion planning in real time is still a challenging problem for controlling a dual robotic manipulator because of the overlap workspace. In this paper, a novel planning strategy under physical constraints of dual manipulators using dynamic neural networks is proposed, which can satisfy the collision avoidance and trajectory tracking. Particularly, the problem of collision avoidance is first formulated into a set of inequality formulas, whereas the robotic trajectory is then transformed into an equality constraint by introducing negative feedback in outer loop. The planning problem subsequently becomes a Quadratic Programming (QP) problem by considering the redundancy, the boundaries of joint angles and velocities of the system. The QP is solved using a convergent provable recurrent neural network that without calculating the pseudo-inversion of the Jacobian. Consequently, numerical experiments on 8-DoF modular robot and 14-DoF Baxter robot are conducted to show the superiority of the proposed strategy
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore