Polynomial-Time Key Recovery Attack on the Faure-Loidreau Scheme based on Gabidulin Codes

Encryption schemes based on the rank metric lead to small public key sizes of order of few thousands bytes which represents a very attractive feature compared to Hamming metric-based encryption schemes where public key sizes are of order of hundreds of thousands bytes even with additional structures like the cyclicity. The main tool for building public key encryption schemes in rank metric is the McEliece encryption setting used with the family of Gabidulin codes. Since the original scheme proposed in 1991 by Gabidulin, Paramonov and Tretjakov, many systems have been proposed based on different masking techniques for Gabidulin codes. Nevertheless, over the years all these systems were attacked essentially by the use of an attack proposed by Overbeck. In 2005 Faure and Loidreau designed a rank-metric encryption scheme which was not in the McEliece setting. The scheme is very efficient, with small public keys of size a few kiloBytes and with security closely related to the linearized polynomial reconstruction problem which corresponds to the decoding problem of Gabidulin codes. The structure of the scheme differs considerably from the classical McEliece setting and until our work, the scheme had never been attacked. We show in this article that this scheme like other schemes based on Gabidulin codes, is also vulnerable to a polynomial-time attack that recovers the private key by applying Overbeck's attack on an appropriate public code. As an example we break concrete proposed $80$ bits security parameters in a few seconds.Comment: To appear in Designs, Codes and Cryptography Journa

Faster Beta Weil Pairing on BLS Pairing Friendly Curves with Odd Embedding Degree

Since the advent of pairing-based cryptography, various optimization methods that increase the speed of pairing computations have been exploited, as well as new types of pairings. This paper extends the work of Kinoshita and Suzuki who proposed a new formula for the $\beta$-Weil pairing on curves with even embedding degree by eliminating denominators and exponents during the computation of the Weil pairing. We provide novel formulas suitable for the parallel computation for the $\beta$-Weil pairing on curves with odd embedding degree which involve vertical line functions useful for sparse multiplications. For computations we used Miller\u27s algorithm combined with storage and multifunction methods. Applying our framework to BLS-$27$, BLS-$15$ and BLS-$9$ curves at respectively the $256$ bit, the $192$ bit and the $128$ bit security level, we obtain faster $\beta$-Weil pairings than the previous state-of-the-art constructions. The correctness of all the formulas and bilinearity of pairings obtained in this work is verified by a SageMath code

SAND: an AND-RX Feistel lightweight block cipher supporting S-box-based security evaluations

We revisit designing AND-RX block ciphers, that is, the designs assembled with the most fundamental binary operations---AND, Rotation and XOR operations and do not rely on existing units. Likely, the most popular representative is the NSA cipher \texttt{SIMON}, which remains one of the most efficient designs, but suffers from difficulty in security evaluation. As our main contribution, we propose \texttt{SAND}, a new family of lightweight AND-RX block ciphers. To overcome the difficulty regarding security evaluation, \texttt{SAND} follows a novel design approach, the core idea of which is to restrain the AND-RX operations to be within nibbles. By this, \texttt{SAND} admits an equivalent representation based on a $4\times8$ \textit{synthetic S-box} ($SSb$). This enables the use of classical S-box-based security evaluation approaches. Consequently, for all versions of \texttt{SAND}, (a) we evaluated security bounds with respect to differential and linear attacks, and in both single-key and related-key scenarios; (b) we also evaluated security against impossible differential and zero-correlation linear attacks. This better understanding of the security enables the use of a relatively simple key schedule, which makes the ASIC round-based hardware implementation of \texttt{SAND} to be one of the state-of-art Feistel lightweight ciphers. As to software performance, due to the natural bitslice structure, \texttt{SAND} reaches the same level of performance as \texttt{SIMON} and is among the most software-efficient block ciphers

The problem with the SURF scheme

There is a serious problem with one of the assumptions made in the security proof of the SURF scheme. This problem turns out to be easy in the regime of parameters needed for the SURF scheme to work. We give afterwards the old version of the paper for the reader's convenience.Comment: Warning : we found a serious problem in the security proof of the SURF scheme. We explain this problem here and give the old version of the paper afterward

Cryptanalysis of Some Block Cipher Constructions

When the public-key cryptography was introduced in the 1970s, symmetric-key cryptography was believed to soon become outdated. Nevertheless, we still heavily rely on symmetric-key primitives as they give high-speed performance. They are used to secure mobile communication, e-commerce transactions, communication through virtual private networks and sending electronic tax returns, among many other everyday activities. However, the security of symmetric-key primitives does not depend on a well-known hard mathematical problem such as the factoring problem, which is the basis of the RSA public-key cryptosystem. Instead, the security of symmetric-key primitives is evaluated against known cryptanalytic techniques. Accordingly, the topic of furthering the state-of-the-art of cryptanalysis of symmetric-key primitives is an ever-evolving topic. Therefore, this thesis is dedicated to the cryptanalysis of symmetric-key cryptographic primitives. Our focus is on block ciphers as well as hash functions that are built using block ciphers. Our contributions can be summarized as follows: First, we tackle the limitation of the current Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) approaches to represent the differential propagation through large S-boxes. Indeed, we present a novel approach that can efficiently model the Difference Distribution Table (DDT) of large S-boxes, i.e., 8-bit S-boxes. As a proof of the validity and efficiency of our approach, we apply it on two out of the seven AES-round based constructions that were recently proposed in FSE 2016. Using our approach, we improve the lower bound on the number of active S-boxes of one construction and the upper bound on the best differential characteristic of the other. Then, we propose meet-in-the-middle attacks using the idea of efficient differential enumeration against two Japanese block ciphers, i.e., Hierocrypt-L1 and Hierocrypt-3. Both block ciphers were submitted to the New European Schemes for Signatures, Integrity, and Encryption (NESSIE) project, selected as one of the Japanese e-Government recommended ciphers in 2003 and reselected in the candidate recommended ciphers list in 2013. We construct five S-box layer distinguishers that we use to recover the master keys of reduced 8 S-box layer versions of both block ciphers. In addition, we present another meet-in-the-middle attack on Hierocrypt-3 with slightly higher time and memory complexities but with much less data complexity. Afterwards, we shift focus to another equally important cryptanalytic attack, i.e., impossible differential attack. SPARX-64/128 is selected among the SPARX family that was recently proposed to provide ARX based block cipher whose security against differential and linear cryptanalysis can be proven. We assess the security of SPARX-64/128 against impossible differential attack and show that it can reach the same number of rounds the division-based integral attack, proposed by the designers, can reach. Then, we pick Kiasu-BC as an example of a tweakable block cipher and prove that, on contrary to its designers’ claim, the freedom in choosing the publicly known tweak decreases its security margin. Lastly, we study the impossible differential properties of the underlying block cipher of the Russian hash standard Streebog and point out the potential risk in using it as a MAC scheme in the secret-IV mode

SURF: A new code-based signature scheme

There is a serious problem with one of the assumptions made in the security proof of the SURF scheme. This problem turns out to be easy in the regime of parameters needed for the SURF scheme to work. We give afterwards the old version of the paper for the reader's convenience

Renforcement formel et automatique de politiques de sécurité dans des applications Android par réécriture

Autant les applications Android ont réussi à positionner Android parmi les systèmes d'exploitation les plus utilisés, autant elles ont facilité aux créateurs de maliciels de s'introduire et de compromettre ses appareils. Une longue liste de menaces causées par les applications téléchargées vise l'intégrité du système et la vie privée de ses utilisateurs. Malgré l'évolution incessante du système Android pour améliorer son mécanisme de sécurité, le niveau de sophistication des logiciels malveillants a augmenté et s'adapte continuellement avec les nouvelles mesures. L'une des principales faiblesses menaçant la sécurité de ce système est le manque abyssal d'outils et d'environnements permettant la spécification et la vérification formelle des comportements des applications avant que les dommages ne soient causés. À cet égard, les méthodes formelles semblent être le moyen le plus naturel et le plus sûr pour une spécification et une vérification rigoureuses et non ambiguës de telles applications. Notre objectif principal est de développer un cadre formel pour le renforcement de politiques de sécurité dans les applications Android. L'idée est d'établir une synergie entre le paradigme orienté aspect et les méthodes formelles. L'approche consiste à réécrire le programme de l'application en ajoutant des tests de sécurité à certains points soigneusement sélectionnés pour garantir le respect de la politique de sécurité. La version réécrite du programme préserve tous les bons comportements de la version originale qui sont conformes à la politique de sécurité et agit contre les mauvais.As much as they have positioned Android among the most widely used operating systems, Android applications have helped malware creators to break in and infect its devices. A long list of threats caused by downloaded applications targets the integrity of the system and the privacy of its users. While the Android system is constantly evolving to improve its security mechanism, the malware's sophistication level is skyrocketing and continuously adapting with the new measures. One of the main weaknesses threatening smartphone security is the abysmal lack of tools and environments that allow formal specification and verification of application behaviors before damage is done. In this regard, formal methods seem to be the most natural and secure way for rigorous and unambiguous specification and verification of such applications. Our ultimate goal is to formally enforce security policies on Android applications. The main idea is to establish a synergy between the aspect-oriented paradigm and formal methods such as the program rewriting technique. The approach consists of rewriting the application program by adding security tests at certain carefully selected points to ensure that the security policy is respected. The rewritten version of the program preserves all the good behaviors of the original one that comply with the security policy and acts against the bad ones