Hybrid and dynamic static criteria models for test case prioritization of web application regression testing

In software testing domain, different techniques and approaches are used to support the process of regression testing in an effective way. The main approaches include test case minimization, test case selection, and test case prioritization. Test case prioritization techniques improve the performance of regression testing by arranging test cases in such a way that maximize fault detection could be achieved in a shorter time. However, the problems for web testing are the timing for executing test cases and the number of fault detected. The aim of this study is to increase the effectiveness of test case prioritization by proposing an approach that could detect faults earlier at a shorter execution time. This research proposed an approach comprising two models: Hybrid Static Criteria Model (HSCM) and Dynamic Weighting Static Criteria Model (DWSCM). Each model applied three criteria: most common HTTP requests in pages, length of HTTP request chains, and dependency of HTTP requests. These criteria are used to prioritize test cases for web application regression testing. The proposed HSCM utilized clustering technique to group test cases. A hybridized technique was proposed to prioritize test cases by relying on assigned test case priorities from the combination of aforementioned criteria. A dynamic weighting scheme of criteria for prioritizing test cases was used to increase fault detection rate. The findings revealed that, the models comprising enhanced of Average Percentage Fault Detection (APFD), yielded the highest APFD of 98% in DWSCM and 87% in HSCM, which have led to improve effectiveness prioritization models. The findings confirmed the ability of the proposed techniques in improving web application regression testing

Test case prioritization using test case diversification and fault-proneness estimations

Context: Regression testing activities greatly reduce the risk of faulty software release. However, the size of the test suites grows throughout the development process, resulting in time-consuming execution of the test suite and delayed feedback to the software development team. This has urged the need for approaches such as test case prioritization (TCP) and test-suite reduction to reach better results in case of limited resources. In this regard, proposing approaches that use auxiliary sources of data such as bug history can be interesting. Objective: Our aim is to propose an approach for TCP that takes into account test case coverage data, bug history, and test case diversification. To evaluate this approach we study its performance on real-world open-source projects. Method: The bug history is used to estimate the fault-proneness of source code areas. The diversification of test cases is preserved by incorporating fault-proneness on a clustering-based approach scheme. Results: The proposed methods are evaluated on datasets collected from the development history of five real-world projects including 357 versions in total. The experiments show that the proposed methods are superior to coverage-based TCP methods. Conclusion: The proposed approach shows that improvement of coverage-based and fault-proneness based methods is possible by using a combination of diversification and fault-proneness incorporation

Clustering Test Cases to Achieve Effective and Scalable Prioritisation Incorporating Expert Knowledge

none4Pair-wise comparison has been successfully utilised in order to prioritise test cases by exploiting the rich, valuable and unique knowledge of the tester. However, the prohibitively large cost of the pairwise comparison method prevents it from being applied to large test suites. In this paper, we introduce a cluster-based test case prioritisation technique. By clustering test cases, based on their dynamic runtime behaviour, we can reduce the required number of pair-wise comparisons significantly. The approach is evaluated on seven test suites ranging in size from 154 to 1,061 test cases. We present an empirical study that shows that the resulting prioritisation is more eective than existing coverage-based prioritisation techniques in terms of rate of fault detection. Perhaps surprisingly, the paper also demonstrates that clustering (even without human input) can outperform unclustered coverage-based technologies, and discusses an automated process that can be used to determine whether the application of the proposed approach would yield improvement.Shin Yoo; Mark Harman; Paolo Tonella; Angelo SusiShin Yoo; Mark Harman; Paolo Tonella; Angelo Sus

Test Case Selection and Prioritization Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Review

Regression testing is an essential activity to assure that software code changes do not adversely affect existing functionalities. With the wide adoption of Continuous Integration (CI) in software projects, which increases the frequency of running software builds, running all tests can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. To alleviate that problem, Test case Selection and Prioritization (TSP) techniques have been proposed to improve regression testing by selecting and prioritizing test cases in order to provide early feedback to developers. In recent years, researchers have relied on Machine Learning (ML) techniques to achieve effective TSP (ML-based TSP). Such techniques help combine information about test cases, from partial and imperfect sources, into accurate prediction models. This work conducts a systematic literature review focused on ML-based TSP techniques, aiming to perform an in-depth analysis of the state of the art, thus gaining insights regarding future avenues of research. To that end, we analyze 29 primary studies published from 2006 to 2020, which have been identified through a systematic and documented process. This paper addresses five research questions addressing variations in ML-based TSP techniques and feature sets for training and testing ML models, alternative metrics used for evaluating the techniques, the performance of techniques, and the reproducibility of the published studies