5 research outputs found

    Cliques in the union of graphs

    Get PDF
    Let B and R be two simple graphs with vertex set V, and let G(B, R) be the simple graph with vertex set V, in which two vertices are adjacent if they are adjacent in at least one of Band R. For XβŠ†V, we denote by B|X the subgraph of B induced by X; let R|X and G(B, R)|X be defined similarly. A clique in a graph is a set of pairwise adjacent vertices. A subset UβŠ†V is obedient if U is the union of a clique of B and a clique of R. Our first result is that if B has no induced cycles of length four, and R has no induced cycles of length four or five, then every clique of G(B, R)is obedient. This strengthens a previous result of the second author, stating the same when B has no induced C_4 and R is chordal. The clique number of a graph is the size of its maximum clique. We say that the pair (B, R)is additive if for every XβŠ†V, the sum of the clique numbers of B|X and R|X is at least the clique number of G(B, R)|X. Our second result is a sufficient condition for additivity of pairs of graphs

    Red-blue clique partitions and (1-1)-transversals

    Get PDF
    Motivated by the problem of Gallai on (1βˆ’1)(1-1)-transversals of 22-intervals, it was proved by the authors in 1969 that if the edges of a complete graph KK are colored with red and blue (both colors can appear on an edge) so that there is no monochromatic induced C4C_4 and C5C_5 then the vertices of KK can be partitioned into a red and a blue clique. Aharoni, Berger, Chudnovsky and Ziani recently strengthened this by showing that it is enough to assume that there is no induced monochromatic C4C_4 and there is no induced C5C_5 in {\em one of the colors}. Here this is strengthened further, it is enough to assume that there is no monochromatic induced C4C_4 and there is no K5K_5 on which both color classes induce a C5C_5. We also answer a question of Kaiser and Rabinovich, giving an example of six 22-convex sets in the plane such that any three intersect but there is no (1βˆ’1)(1-1)-transversal for them

    A Characterisation of Strong Integer Additive Set-Indexers of Graphs

    Get PDF
    An integer additive set-indexer is defined as an injective function f:V(G)β†’2N0f:V(G)\rightarrow 2^{\mathbb{N}_0} such that the induced function gf:E(G)β†’2N0g_f:E(G) \rightarrow 2^{\mathbb{N}_0} defined by gf(uv)=f(u)+f(v)g_f (uv) = f(u)+ f(v) is also injective, where f(u)+f(v)f(u)+f(v) is the sumset of f(u)f(u) and f(v)f(v). If gf(uv)=kΒ βˆ€Β uv∈E(G)g_f(uv)=k~\forall~uv\in E(G), then ff is said to be a kk-uniform integer additive set-indexers. An integer additive set-indexer ff is said to be a strong integer additive set-indexer if ∣gf(uv)∣=∣f(u)∣.∣f(v)βˆ£Β βˆ€Β uv∈E(G)|g_f(uv)|=|f(u)|.|f(v)|~\forall ~ uv\in E(G). We already have some characteristics of the graphs which admit strong integer additive set-indexers. In this paper, we study the characteristics of certain graph classes, graph operations and graph products that admit strong integer additive set-indexers.Comment: 10 page
    corecore