PIE the search: searching PubMed literature for protein interaction information

Motivation: Finding protein-protein interaction (PPI) information from literature is challenging but an important issue. However, keyword search in PubMed® is often time consuming because it requires a series of actions that refine keywords and browse search results until it reaches a goal. Due to the rapid growth of biomedical literature, it has become more difficult for biologists and curators to locate PPI information quickly. Therefore, a tool for prioritizing PPI informative articles can be a useful assistant for finding this PPI-relevant information

The Protein-Protein Interaction tasks of BioCreative III: classification/ranking of articles and linking bio-ontology concepts to full text

BACKGROUND: Determining usefulness of biomedical text mining systems requires realistic task definition and data selection criteria without artificial constraints, measuring performance aspects that go beyond traditional metrics. The BioCreative III Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) tasks were motivated by such considerations, trying to address aspects including how the end user would oversee the generated output, for instance by providing ranked results, textual evidence for human interpretation or measuring time savings by using automated systems. Detecting articles describing complex biological events like PPIs was addressed in the Article Classification Task (ACT), where participants were asked to implement tools for detecting PPI-describing abstracts. Therefore the BCIII-ACT corpus was provided, which includes a training, development and test set of over 12,000 PPI relevant and non-relevant PubMed abstracts labeled manually by domain experts and recording also the human classification times. The Interaction Method Task (IMT) went beyond abstracts and required mining for associations between more than 3,500 full text articles and interaction detection method ontology concepts that had been applied to detect the PPIs reported in them.RESULTS:A total of 11 teams participated in at least one of the two PPI tasks (10 in ACT and 8 in the IMT) and a total of 62 persons were involved either as participants or in preparing data sets/evaluating these tasks. Per task, each team was allowed to submit five runs offline and another five online via the BioCreative Meta-Server. From the 52 runs submitted for the ACT, the highest Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC) score measured was 0.55 at an accuracy of 89 and the best AUC iP/R was 68. Most ACT teams explored machine learning methods, some of them also used lexical resources like MeSH terms, PSI-MI concepts or particular lists of verbs and nouns, some integrated NER approaches. For the IMT, a total of 42 runs were evaluated by comparing systems against manually generated annotations done by curators from the BioGRID and MINT databases. The highest AUC iP/R achieved by any run was 53, the best MCC score 0.55. In case of competitive systems with an acceptable recall (above 35) the macro-averaged precision ranged between 50 and 80, with a maximum F-Score of 55. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the ACT task of BioCreative III indicate that classification of large unbalanced article collections reflecting the real class imbalance is still challenging. Nevertheless, text-mining tools that report ranked lists of relevant articles for manual selection can potentially reduce the time needed to identify half of the relevant articles to less than 1/4 of the time when compared to unranked results. Detecting associations between full text articles and interaction detection method PSI-MI terms (IMT) is more difficult than might be anticipated. This is due to the variability of method term mentions, errors resulting from pre-processing of articles provided as PDF files, and the heterogeneity and different granularity of method term concepts encountered in the ontology. However, combining the sophisticated techniques developed by the participants with supporting evidence strings derived from the articles for human interpretation could result in practical modules for biological annotation workflows

A Supervised Learning Approach for Imbalanced Text Classification of Biomedical Literature Triage

This thesis presents the development of a machine learning system, called mycoSORT , for supporting the first step of the biological literature manual curation process, called triage. The manual triage of documents is very demanding, as researchers usually face the time-consuming and error- prone task of screening a large amount of data to identify relevant information. After querying scientific databases for keywords related to a specific subject, researchers generally find a long list of retrieved results, that has to be carefully analysed to identify only a few documents that show a potential of being relevant to the topic. Such an analysis represents a severe bottleneck in the knowledge discovery and decision-making processes in scientific research. Hence, biocurators could greatly benefit from an automatic support when performing the triage task. In order to support the triage of scientific documents, we have used a corpus of document instances manually labeled by biocurators as “selected” or “rejected”, with regards to their potential to indicate relevant information about fungal enzymes. This document collection is characterized by being large, since many results are retrieved and analysed to finally identify potential candidate documents; and also highly imbalanced, concerning the distribution of instances per relevance: the great majority of documents are labeled as rejected, while only a very small portion are labeled as selected. Using this dataset, we studied the design of a classification model to identify the most discriminative features to automate the triage of scientific literature and to tackle the imbalance between the two classes of documents. To identify the most suitable model, we performed a study of 324 classification models, which demonstrated the results of using 9 different data undersampling factors, 4 sets of features, and the evaluation of 2 feature selection methods as well as 3 machine learning algorithms. Our results demonstrated that the use of an undersampling technique is effective to handle imbalanced datasets and also help manage large document collections. We also found that the combination of undersampling and feature selection using Odds Ratio can improve the performance of our classification model. Finally, our results demonstrated that the best fitting model to support the triage of scientific documents is composed by domain relevant features, filtered by Odds Ratio scores, the use of dataset undersampling and the Logistic Model Trees algorithm

Text Mining for Protein-Protein Docking

Scientific publications are a rich but underutilized source of structural and functional information on proteins and protein interactions. Although scientific literature is intended for human audience, text mining makes it amenable to algorithmic processing. It can focus on extracting information relevant to protein binding modes, providing specific residues that are likely be at the binding site for a given pair of proteins. The knowledge of such residues is a powerful guide for the structural modeling of protein-protein complexes. This work combines and extends two well-established areas of research: the non-structural identification of protein-protein interactors, and structure-based detection of functional (small-ligand) sites on proteins. Text-mining based constraints for protein-protein docking is a unique research direction, which has not been explored prior to this study. Although text mining by itself is unlikely to produce docked models, it is useful in scoring of the docking predictions. Our results show that despite presence of false positives, text mining significantly improves the docking quality. To purge false positives in the mined residues, along with the basic text-mining, this work explores enhanced text mining techniques, using various language processing tools, from simple dictionaries, to WordNet (a generic word ontology), parse trees, word vectors and deep recursive neural networks. The results significantly increase confidence in the generated docking constraints and provide guidelines for the future development of this modeling approach. With the rapid growth of the body of publicly available biomedical literature, and new evolving text-mining methodologies, the approach will become more powerful and adequate to the needs of biomedical community