71 research outputs found

    Holmes: An Efficient and Lightweight Semantic Based Anomalous Email Detector

    Full text link
    Email threat is a serious issue for enterprise security, which consists of various malicious scenarios, such as phishing, fraud, blackmail and malvertisement. Traditional anti-spam gateway commonly requires to maintain a greylist to filter out unexpected emails based on suspicious vocabularies existed in the mail subject and content. However, the signature-based approach cannot effectively discover novel and unknown suspicious emails that utilize various hot topics at present, such as COVID-19 and US election. To address the problem, in this paper, we present Holmes, an efficient and lightweight semantic based engine for anomalous email detection. Holmes can convert each event log of email to a sentence through word embedding then extract interesting items among them by novelty detection. Based on our observations, we claim that, in an enterprise environment, there is a stable relation between senders and receivers, but suspicious emails are commonly from unusual sources, which can be detected through the rareness selection. We evaluate the performance of Holmes in a real-world enterprise environment, in which it sends and receives around 5,000 emails each day. As a result, Holmes can achieve a high detection rate (output around 200 suspicious emails per day) and maintain a low false alarm rate for anomaly detection

    An architectural-based approach to detecting spim in electronic means of communication

    Get PDF
    Spams are what users and developers should be aware of in all Internet-based communication tools (such as e-mail, websites, Social Networking Sites (SNS), instant messengers and so on). This is because spammers have not ceased from using these platforms to deceive and lure users into releasing vibrant and sensitive information (especially, financial details). This paper developed an architectural based technique for SPIM (Instant Message Spam or IM SPAM) detection using the classification method. The classification was done using the C4.5 classifier with a dataset of messages gotten from an instant messaging environment. The dataset served as the input to the classification algorithm method which was able to distinguish spam from non-spam messages. This classification method was depicted in a tree form to show its usefulness. The results show that its precision, recall and accuracy rate satisfied standard recommendation with a commendable error rate. The proposed technique will find implication in the reduction of the number of Internet users.Keywords: Social Networking sites, spammers, Instant message spam, C4.5 Classifiers, e-mails

    Fake News Detection with Deep Diffusive Network Model

    Get PDF
    In recent years, due to the booming development of online social networks, fake news for various commercial and political purposes has been appearing in large numbers and widespread in the online world. With deceptive words, online social network users can get infected by these online fake news easily, which has brought about tremendous effects on the offline society already. An important goal in improving the trustworthiness of information in online social networks is to identify the fake news timely. This paper aims at investigating the principles, methodologies and algorithms for detecting fake news articles, creators and subjects from online social networks and evaluating the corresponding performance. This paper addresses the challenges introduced by the unknown characteristics of fake news and diverse connections among news articles, creators and subjects. Based on a detailed data analysis, this paper introduces a novel automatic fake news credibility inference model, namely FakeDetector. Based on a set of explicit and latent features extracted from the textual information, FakeDetector builds a deep diffusive network model to learn the representations of news articles, creators and subjects simultaneously. Extensive experiments have been done on a real-world fake news dataset to compare FakeDetector with several state-of-the-art models, and the experimental results have demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed model

    ๊ฐœ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ง ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ž ํƒ์ง€

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ๊น€์ข…๊ถŒ.In the last decade we have witnessed the explosive growth of online social networking services (SNSs) such as Facebook, Twitter, Weibo and LinkedIn. While SNSs provide diverse benefits โ€“ for example, fostering inter-personal relationships, community formations and news propagation, they also attracted uninvited nuiance. Spammers abuse SNSs as vehicles to spread spams rapidly and widely. Spams, unsolicited or inappropriate messages, significantly impair the credibility and reliability of services. Therefore, detecting spammers has become an urgent and critical issue in SNSs. This paper deals with spamming in Twitter and Weibo. Instead of spreading annoying messages to the public, a spammer follows (subscribes to) normal users, and followed a normal user. Sometimes a spammer makes link farm to increase target accounts explicit influence. Based on the assumption that the online relationships of spammers are different from those of normal users, I proposed classification schemes that detect online social attackers including spammers. I firstly focused on ego-network social relations and devised two features, structural features based on Triad Significance Profile (TSP) and relational semantic features based on hierarchical homophily in an ego-network. Experiments on real Twitter and Weibo datasets demonstrated that the proposed approach is very practical. The proposed features are scalable because instead of analyzing the whole network, they inspect user-centered ego-networks. My performance study showed that proposed methods yield significantly better performance than prior scheme in terms of true positives and false positives.์ตœ๊ทผ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” Facebook, Twitter, Weibo, LinkedIn ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ง ์„œ๋น„์Šค๊ฐ€ ํญ๋ฐœ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ฑ์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ๋ชฉ๊ฒฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ง ์„œ๋น„์Šค๊ฐ€ ๊ฐœ์ธ๊ณผ ๊ฐœ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋‰ด์Šค ์ „ํŒŒ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ด์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ด ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ ๋ฐ˜ํ•ด ๋ฐ˜๊ฐ‘์ง€ ์•Š์€ ํ˜„์ƒ ์—ญ์‹œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ŠคํŒจ๋จธ๋“ค์€ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ง ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋ฅผ ๋™๋ ฅ ์‚ผ์•„ ์ŠคํŒธ์„ ๋งค์šฐ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ๋„“๊ฒŒ ์ „ํŒŒํ•˜๋Š” ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์•…์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ŠคํŒธ์€ ์ˆ˜์‹ ์ž๊ฐ€ ์›์น˜ ์•Š๋Š” ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€๋“ค์„ ์ผ์ปฝ๋Š”๋ฐ ์ด๋Š” ์„œ๋น„์Šค์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„์™€ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์†์ƒ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์ŠคํŒจ๋จธ๋ฅผ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ˜„์žฌ ์†Œ์…œ ๋ฏธ๋””์–ด์—์„œ ๋งค์šฐ ๊ธด๊ธ‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ง ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋“ค ์ค‘ Twitter์™€ Weibo์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ŠคํŒจ๋ฐ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์ŠคํŒจ๋ฐ๋“ค์€ ๋ถˆํŠน์ • ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์—๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ „ํŒŒํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์‹ ์—, ๋งŽ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์„ 'ํŒ”๋กœ์šฐ(๊ตฌ๋…)'ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋“ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ '๋งž ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰(๋งž ๊ตฌ๋…)'์„ ์ด๋Œ์–ด ๋‚ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋•Œ๋กœ๋Š” link farm์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ํŠน์ • ๊ณ„์ •์˜ ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๊ณ  ๋ช…์‹œ์  ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ŠคํŒจ๋จธ์˜ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ง์ด ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ง๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ฅผ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ • ํ•˜์—, ๋‚˜๋Š” ์ŠคํŒจ๋จธ๋“ค์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ง ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ž๋“ค์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜๋Š” ๋จผ์ € ๊ฐœ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ง ๋‚ด ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋“ค์€ ๊ฐœ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ง์˜ Triad Significance Profile (TSP)์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ Hierarchical homophily์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์˜๋ฏธ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์ด๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ Twitter์™€ Weibo ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋งค์šฐ ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ๋“ค์€ ์ „์ฒด ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•„๋„ ๊ฐœ์ธ ์‚ฌํšŒ๋ง๋งŒ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— scalableํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ธก์ •๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋น„ํ•ด true positive์™€ false positive ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค.1 Introduction 1 2 Related Work 6 2.1 OSN Spammer Detection Approaches 6 2.1.1 Contents-based Approach 6 2.1.2 Social Network-based Approach 7 2.1.3 Subnetwork-based Approach 8 2.1.4 Behavior-based Approach 9 2.2 Link Spam Detection 10 2.3 Data mining schemes for Spammer Detection 10 2.4 Sybil Detection 12 3 Triad Significance Profile Analysis 14 3.1 Motivation 14 3.2 Twitter Dataset 18 3.3 Indegree and Outdegree of Dataset 20 3.4 Twitter spammer Detection with TSP 22 3.5 TSP-Filtering 27 3.6 Performance Evaluation of TSP-Filtering 29 4 Hierarchical Homophily Analysis 33 4.1 Motivation 33 4.2 Hierarchical Homophily in OSN 37 4.2.1 Basic Analysis of Datasets 39 4.2.2 Status gap distribution and Assortativity 44 4.2.3 Hierarchical gap distribution 49 4.3 Performance Evaluation of HH-Filtering 53 5 Overall Performance Evaluation 58 6 Conclusion 63 Bibliography 65Docto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore