40,524 research outputs found
Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoning
Recent work on fairness in machine learning has focused on various
statistical discrimination criteria and how they trade off. Most of these
criteria are observational: They depend only on the joint distribution of
predictor, protected attribute, features, and outcome. While convenient to work
with, observational criteria have severe inherent limitations that prevent them
from resolving matters of fairness conclusively.
Going beyond observational criteria, we frame the problem of discrimination
based on protected attributes in the language of causal reasoning. This
viewpoint shifts attention from "What is the right fairness criterion?" to
"What do we want to assume about the causal data generating process?" Through
the lens of causality, we make several contributions. First, we crisply
articulate why and when observational criteria fail, thus formalizing what was
before a matter of opinion. Second, our approach exposes previously ignored
subtleties and why they are fundamental to the problem. Finally, we put forward
natural causal non-discrimination criteria and develop algorithms that satisfy
them.Comment: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, 2017
http://papers.nips.cc/paper/6668-avoiding-discrimination-through-causal-reasonin
Causal Confusion in Imitation Learning
Behavioral cloning reduces policy learning to supervised learning by training
a discriminative model to predict expert actions given observations. Such
discriminative models are non-causal: the training procedure is unaware of the
causal structure of the interaction between the expert and the environment. We
point out that ignoring causality is particularly damaging because of the
distributional shift in imitation learning. In particular, it leads to a
counter-intuitive "causal misidentification" phenomenon: access to more
information can yield worse performance. We investigate how this problem
arises, and propose a solution to combat it through targeted
interventions---either environment interaction or expert queries---to determine
the correct causal model. We show that causal misidentification occurs in
several benchmark control domains as well as realistic driving settings, and
validate our solution against DAgger and other baselines and ablations.Comment: Published at NeurIPS 2019 9 pages, plus references and appendice
Causal networks for climate model evaluation and constrained projections
Global climate models are central tools for understanding past and future climate change. The assessment of model skill, in turn, can benefit from modern data science approaches. Here we apply causal discovery algorithms to sea level pressure data from a large set of climate model simulations and, as a proxy for observations, meteorological reanalyses. We demonstrate how the resulting causal networks (fingerprints) offer an objective pathway for process-oriented model evaluation. Models with fingerprints closer to observations better reproduce important precipitation patterns over highly populated areas such as the Indian subcontinent, Africa, East Asia, Europe and North America. We further identify expected model interdependencies due to shared development backgrounds. Finally, our network metrics provide stronger relationships for constraining precipitation projections under climate change as compared to traditional evaluation metrics for storm tracks or precipitation itself. Such emergent relationships highlight the potential of causal networks to constrain longstanding uncertainties in climate change projections. Algorithms to assess causal relationships in data sets have seen increasing applications in climate science in recent years. Here, the authors show that these techniques can help to systematically evaluate the performance of climate models and, as a result, to constrain uncertainties in future climate change projections
- …