4 research outputs found

    Prosessilouhintamallin luominen normaalimuutosprosessin tueksi

    Get PDF
    LiiketoimintaympĂ€ristö muuttuu ja yritykset pyrkivĂ€t pysymÀÀn muutosten mukana kehittĂ€mĂ€llĂ€ liiketoimintaprosesseja. TietojĂ€rjestelmĂ€t tuottavat paljon tietoa, jonka hyödyntĂ€minen on vielĂ€ vĂ€hĂ€istĂ€. Prosessilouhinta mahdollistaa tietojĂ€rjestelmien tuottaman tiedon kĂ€yttĂ€misen liiketoimintaprosessien kehittĂ€misessĂ€. TĂ€mĂ€ tutkimus on syntynyt kohdeyrityksen tarpeesta saada lisÀÀ lĂ€pinĂ€kyvyyttĂ€ ja parantaa tiedolla johtamista IT-palvelunhallintaan kuuluvan muutoksenhallinnan normaalimuutosprosessissa. Tutkimus seuraa suunnittelututkimusprosessin viitekehystĂ€. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli selvittÀÀ prosessilouhinnan edellytykset ja mahdollisuudet normaalimuutosprosessin tueksi. Tutkimuksessa suunniteltiin, luotiin ja arvioitiin artefakti, joka tĂ€ssĂ€ tapauksessa oli prosessilouhintamalli. Prosessilouhintamallin tavoitteena oli lisĂ€tĂ€ tutkittavan prosessin lĂ€pinĂ€kyvyyttĂ€ ja kehittÀÀ tiedolla johtamista. Prosessilouhintamallin suunnittelussa oli keskeistĂ€ tunnistaa lĂ€hdejĂ€rjestelmĂ€stĂ€ tarvittavat tiedot ja luoda tietoihin pohjautuva tapahtumaloki. Tapahtumaloki oli edellytys prosessilouhinnan suorittamiselle. Tutkimuksessa kĂ€ytettiin lĂ€hdejĂ€rjestelmĂ€n kehittĂ€jĂ€ympĂ€ristöstĂ€ saatuja tietoja, koska tuotantoympĂ€ristöön ei saatu tarvittavia kĂ€yttöoikeuksia tutkimuksen aikarajojen puitteissa. KehittĂ€jĂ€ympĂ€ristön tiedot olivat heikkolaatuisia, jotka aiheuttivat artefaktin arvioinnissa haasteita. Prosessilouhintamallin arviointi tapahtui haastattelemalla kohdeyrityksen muutoksenhallintaprosessin avainhenkilöitĂ€. Tutkimuksen tuloksena onnistuttiin luomaan prosessilouhintamalli sekĂ€ yleisesti syventĂ€mÀÀn kohdeyrityksen ymmĂ€rrystĂ€ ja osaamista prosessilouhinnasta. Luotu prosessilouhintamalli lisĂ€si prosessin lĂ€pinĂ€kyvyyttĂ€ esittĂ€mĂ€llĂ€ prosessin aikaiset tapahtumat. Tapauksia pystytÀÀn tarkastelemaan kokonaisuutena ja yksittĂ€isinĂ€. PÀÀtöksenteon taustalla on enemmĂ€n tietoa, kun prosessilouhintamallia kĂ€ytetÀÀn. NĂ€in ollen tiedolla johtaminen kehittyy ja kohdeyritys pystyy tunnistamaan ongelmakohdat tarkemmin, joihin resurssit voidaan kohdentaa tehokkaasti. Tutkimuksen avulla pystyttiin myös kasvattamaan kohdeyrityksen ymmĂ€rrystĂ€ teknologian mahdollisuuksista. Prosessilouhinnan laajempi kĂ€yttöönotto koettiin mahdolliseksi kohdeyrityksessĂ€. Haasteiksi koettiin lisĂ€resurssien tarve ja muutoksen merkittĂ€vyys. Prosessilouhinnan kĂ€yttöönotto vie aikaa ja vaatii sitoutumista koko yritykseltĂ€. Tutkimusprosessia seuraten kohdeyritys voi tarkastella muitakin prosesseja. Tutkimuksesta on hyötyĂ€ myös muille yrityksille, jotka ovat kiinnostuneita, miten toteuttaa yksi tunnistettu kĂ€yt-tötapaus. Seuraavana askeleena kohdeyritykselle on kĂ€yttÀÀ tuotantoympĂ€ristön tietoja, joiden avulla kehittÀÀ luotua prosessilouhintamallia ja analysoimalla prosessia syvĂ€llisesti. LisĂ€ksi kohdeyritys voi alkaa laajentamaan kĂ€yttöönottoa muihin prosesseihin.Business environment is changing, and companies try to keep up with change by developing business processes. Information systems produce lots of information which is not greatly utilised. Process mining enables the usage of data produced by systems in business process development. This research has originated from the target company’s needs to increase transparency and enhance knowledge management in change management’s normal change process. The research utilises design science research framework. The objective of the research was to investigate requirements and opportunities of process mining to support normal change process. In the research an artefact was designed, created, and evaluated which was a process mining model in this case. The objective of the process mining model was to increase transparency of the process and develop knowledge management. The essential part of designing process mining model was to identify required data from the source system and create an event log based on the data. Event log was required to perform process mining. Data from source system’s development environment was used in the research because access rights to production environment was not granted during the research timeframe. Development environment data was low quality which caused challenges during artefact’s evaluation phase. Evaluating the process mining model was conducted by interviewing target company’s key personnel in change management process. As a result of the research process mining model was successfully created and overall target company’s process mining knowledge was enhanced. The created process mining model increased transparency of the process by illustrating the activities during the process. Cases can be examined as a group and individually. There is more information available to support decision making. Therefore, knowledge management is evolving, and target company can efficiently identify problems where resources can be allocated. Target company was also able to gain more understanding about the opportunities of the technology. Extensive implementation of process mining was considered possible in target company. Perceived challenges to implementation are need for additional resources and magnitude of the change. Implementing process mining takes time and requires commitment from the whole company. By using the conducted research process target company can examine other processes as well. The research is useful for other companies which are interested to learn how specific use case was implemented. Next step for the target company is to use data from production environment to develop the created process mining model and analyse the process profoundly. In addition, implementation of process mining can be extended to other processes

    Äriprotsesside ajaliste nĂ€itajate selgitatav ennustav jĂ€lgimine

    Get PDF
    Kaasaegsed ettevĂ”tte infosĂŒsteemid vĂ”imaldavad ettevĂ”tetel koguda detailset informatsiooni Ă€riprotsesside tĂ€itmiste kohta. Eelnev koos masinĂ”ppe meetoditega vĂ”imaldab kasutada andmejuhitavaid ja ennustatavaid lĂ€henemisi Ă€riprotsesside jĂ”udluse jĂ€lgimiseks. Kasutades ennustuslike Ă€riprotsesside jĂ€lgimise tehnikaid on vĂ”imalik jĂ”udluse probleeme ennustada ning soovimatu tegurite mĂ”ju ennetavalt leevendada. TĂŒĂŒpilised kĂŒsimused, millega tegeleb ennustuslik protsesside jĂ€lgimine on “millal antud Ă€riprotsess lĂ”ppeb?” vĂ”i “mis on kĂ”ige tĂ”enĂ€olisem jĂ€rgmine sĂŒndmus antud Ă€riprotsessi jaoks?”. Suurim osa olemasolevatest lahendustest eelistavad tĂ€psust selgitatavusele. Praktikas, selgitatavus on ennustatavate tehnikate tĂ€htis tunnus. Ennustused, kas protsessi tĂ€itmine ebaĂ”nnestub vĂ”i selle tĂ€itmisel vĂ”ivad tekkida raskused, pole piisavad. On oluline kasutajatele seletada, kuidas on selline ennustuse tulemus saavutatud ning mida saab teha soovimatu tulemuse ennetamiseks. Töö pakub vĂ€lja kaks meetodit ennustatavate mudelite konstrueerimiseks, mis vĂ”imaldavad jĂ€lgida Ă€riprotsesse ning keskenduvad selgitatavusel. Seda saavutatakse ennustuse lahtivĂ”tmisega elementaarosadeks. NĂ€iteks, kui ennustatakse, et Ă€riprotsessi lĂ”puni on jÀÀnud aega 20 tundi, siis saame anda seletust, et see aeg on moodustatud kĂ”ikide seni kĂ€sitlemata tegevuste lĂ”petamiseks vajalikust ajast. Töös vĂ”rreldakse omavahel eelmainitud meetodeid, kĂ€sitledes Ă€riprotsesse erinevatest valdkondadest. Hindamine toob esile erinevusi selgitatava ja tĂ€psusele pĂ”hinevale lĂ€henemiste vahel. Töö teaduslik panus on ennustuslikuks protsesside jĂ€lgimiseks vabavaralise tööriista arendamine. SĂŒsteemi nimeks on Nirdizati ning see sĂŒsteem vĂ”imaldab treenida ennustuslike masinĂ”ppe mudeleid, kasutades nii töös kirjeldatud meetodeid kui ka kolmanda osapoole meetodeid. Hiljem saab treenitud mudeleid kasutada hetkel kĂ€ivate Ă€riprotsesside tulemuste ennustamiseks, mis saab aidata kasutajaid reaalajas.Modern enterprise systems collect detailed data about the execution of the business processes they support. The widespread availability of such data in companies, coupled with advances in machine learning, have led to the emergence of data-driven and predictive approaches to monitor the performance of business processes. By using such predictive process monitoring approaches, potential performance issues can be anticipated and proactively mitigated. Various approaches have been proposed to address typical predictive process monitoring questions, such as what is the most likely continuation of an ongoing process instance, or when it will finish. However, most existing approaches prioritize accuracy over explainability. Yet in practice, explainability is a critical property of predictive methods. It is not enough to accurately predict that a running process instance will end up in an undesired outcome. It is also important for users to understand why this prediction is made and what can be done to prevent this undesired outcome. This thesis proposes two methods to build predictive models to monitor business processes in an explainable manner. This is achieved by decomposing a prediction into its elementary components. For example, to explain that the remaining execution time of a process execution is predicted to be 20 hours, we decompose this prediction into the predicted execution time of each activity that has not yet been executed. We evaluate the proposed methods against each other and various state-of-the-art baselines using a range of business processes from multiple domains. The evaluation reaffirms a fundamental trade-off between explainability and accuracy of predictions. The research contributions of the thesis have been consolidated into an open-source tool for predictive business process monitoring, namely Nirdizati. It can be used to train predictive models using the methods described in this thesis, as well as third-party methods. These models are then used to make predictions for ongoing process instances; thus, the tool can also support users at runtime
    corecore