207 research outputs found

    Quantum Entanglement: Separability, Measure, Fidelity of Teleportation and Distillation

    Full text link
    Quantum entanglement plays crucial roles in quantum information processing. Quantum entangled states have become the key ingredient in the rapidly expanding field of quantum information science. Although the nonclassical nature of entanglement has been recognized for many years, considerable efforts have been taken to understand and characterize its properties recently. In this review, we introduce some recent results in the theory of quantum entanglement. In particular separability criteria based on the Bloch representation, covariance matrix, normal form and entanglement witness; lower bounds, subadditivity property of concurrence and tangle; fully entangled fraction related to the optimal fidelity of quantum teleportation and entanglement distillation will be discussed in detail.Comment: 63 pages, 4 figure

    Measure of multipartite entanglement with computable lower bounds

    Full text link
    In this paper, we present a measure of multipartite entanglement (kk-nonseparable), kk-ME concurrence CkME(ρ)C_{k-\mathrm{ME}}(\rho) that unambiguously detects all kk-nonseparable states in arbitrary dimensions, where the special case, 2-ME concurrence C2ME(ρ)C_{2-\mathrm{ME}}(\rho), is a measure of genuine multipartite entanglement. The new measure kk-ME concurrence satisfies important characteristics of an entanglement measure including entanglement monotone, vanishing on kk-separable states, convexity, subadditivity and strictly greater than zero for all kk-nonseparable states. Two powerful lower bounds on this measure are given. These lower bounds are experimentally implementable without quantum state tomography and are easily computable as no optimization or eigenvalue evaluation is needed. We illustrate detailed examples in which the given bounds perform better than other known detection criteria.Comment: 12 pages, 3 figure

    Entanglement and magnetic order

    Full text link
    In recent years quantum statistical mechanics have benefited of cultural interchanges with quantum information science. There is a bulk of evidence that quantifying the entanglement allows a fine analysis of many relevant properties of many-body quantum systems. Here we review the relation between entanglement and the various type of magnetic order occurring in interacting spin systems.Comment: 29 pages, 10 eps figures. Review article for the special issue "Entanglement entropy in extended systems" in J. Phys. A, edited by P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and B. Doyo

    Multi-partite analysis of average-subsystem entropies

    Full text link
    So-called average subsystem entropies are defined by first taking partial traces over some pure state to define density matrices, then calculating the subsystem entropies, and finally averaging over the pure states to define the average subsystem entropies. These quantities are standard tools in quantum information theory, most typically applied in bipartite systems. We shall first present some extensions to the usual bipartite analysis, (including a calculation of the average tangle, and a bound on the average concurrence), follow this with some useful results for tripartite systems, and finally extend the discussion to arbitrary multi-partite systems. A particularly nice feature of tri-partite and multi-partite analyses is that this framework allows one to introduce an "environment" for small subsystems to couple to.Comment: Minor changes. 1 reference added. Published versio

    General Monogamy Inequality for Bipartite Qubit Entanglement

    Get PDF
    We consider multipartite states of qubits and prove that their bipartite quantum entanglement, as quantified by the concurrence, satisfies a monogamy inequality conjectured by Coffman, Kundu, and Wootters. We relate this monogamy inequality to the concept of frustration of correlations in quantum spin systems.Comment: Fixed spelling mistake. Added references. Fixed error in transformation law. Shorter and more explicit proof of capacity formula. Reference added. Rewritten introduction and conclusion
    corecore