10,958 research outputs found
Online Deception Detection Refueled by Real World Data Collection
The lack of large realistic datasets presents a bottleneck in online
deception detection studies. In this paper, we apply a data collection method
based on social network analysis to quickly identify high-quality deceptive and
truthful online reviews from Amazon. The dataset contains more than 10,000
deceptive reviews and is diverse in product domains and reviewers. Using this
dataset, we explore effective general features for online deception detection
that perform well across domains. We demonstrate that with generalized features
- advertising speak and writing complexity scores - deception detection
performance can be further improved by adding additional deceptive reviews from
assorted domains in training. Finally, reviewer level evaluation gives an
interesting insight into different deceptive reviewers' writing styles.Comment: 10 pages, Accepted to Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing
(RANLP) 201
Much Ado About Time: Exhaustive Annotation of Temporal Data
Large-scale annotated datasets allow AI systems to learn from and build upon
the knowledge of the crowd. Many crowdsourcing techniques have been developed
for collecting image annotations. These techniques often implicitly rely on the
fact that a new input image takes a negligible amount of time to perceive. In
contrast, we investigate and determine the most cost-effective way of obtaining
high-quality multi-label annotations for temporal data such as videos. Watching
even a short 30-second video clip requires a significant time investment from a
crowd worker; thus, requesting multiple annotations following a single viewing
is an important cost-saving strategy. But how many questions should we ask per
video? We conclude that the optimal strategy is to ask as many questions as
possible in a HIT (up to 52 binary questions after watching a 30-second video
clip in our experiments). We demonstrate that while workers may not correctly
answer all questions, the cost-benefit analysis nevertheless favors consensus
from multiple such cheap-yet-imperfect iterations over more complex
alternatives. When compared with a one-question-per-video baseline, our method
is able to achieve a 10% improvement in recall 76.7% ours versus 66.7%
baseline) at comparable precision (83.8% ours versus 83.0% baseline) in about
half the annotation time (3.8 minutes ours compared to 7.1 minutes baseline).
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by collecting multi-label
annotations of 157 human activities on 1,815 videos.Comment: HCOMP 2016 Camera Read
On Cognitive Preferences and the Plausibility of Rule-based Models
It is conventional wisdom in machine learning and data mining that logical
models such as rule sets are more interpretable than other models, and that
among such rule-based models, simpler models are more interpretable than more
complex ones. In this position paper, we question this latter assumption by
focusing on one particular aspect of interpretability, namely the plausibility
of models. Roughly speaking, we equate the plausibility of a model with the
likeliness that a user accepts it as an explanation for a prediction. In
particular, we argue that, all other things being equal, longer explanations
may be more convincing than shorter ones, and that the predominant bias for
shorter models, which is typically necessary for learning powerful
discriminative models, may not be suitable when it comes to user acceptance of
the learned models. To that end, we first recapitulate evidence for and against
this postulate, and then report the results of an evaluation in a
crowd-sourcing study based on about 3.000 judgments. The results do not reveal
a strong preference for simple rules, whereas we can observe a weak preference
for longer rules in some domains. We then relate these results to well-known
cognitive biases such as the conjunction fallacy, the representative heuristic,
or the recogition heuristic, and investigate their relation to rule length and
plausibility.Comment: V4: Another rewrite of section on interpretability to clarify focus
on plausibility and relation to interpretability, comprehensibility, and
justifiabilit
- …