Black-Box Parallel Garbled RAM

In 1982, Yao introduced a fundamental technique of ``circuit garbling\u27\u27 that became a central building block in cryptography. Recently, the question of garbling general random-access memory (RAM) programs received a lot of attention in the literature where garbling an encrypted data can be done separately from garbling program(s) that execute on this (garbled) RAM. The most recent results of Garg, Lu, and Ostrovsky (FOCS 2015) achieve a garbled RAM with black-box use of any one-way functions and poly-log overhead of data and program garbling in all the relevant parameters, including program run-time. The advantage of their solution is that large data can be garbled first, and act as persistent garbled storage (e.g. in the cloud) and later programs can be garbled and sent to be executed on this garbled database in a non-interactive manner. One of the main advantages of cloud computing is not only that it has large storage but also that it has a large number of parallel processors. Despite multiple successful efforts on parallelizing (interactive) Oblivious RAM, the non-interactive garbling of parallel programs remained open until very recently. Specifically, Boyle, Chung and Pass in their upcoming TCC 2016 paper (see their recently updated eprint version) have recently shown how to garbled PRAM program with poly-logarithmic (parallel) overhead assuming non-black-box use of identity-based encryption. The question whether such a strong assumption and non-black-box use of such a strong assumption are needed. In this paper, we resolve this important open question and show how to garble parallel programs, with only black-box use one one-way functions and with only poly-log overhead in the (parallel) running time. Our result works for any number of parallel processors

TGh: A TEE/GC Hybrid Enabling Confidential FaaS Platforms

Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) suffer from performance issues when executing certain management instructions, such as creating an enclave, context switching in and out of protected mode, and swapping cached pages. This is especially problematic for short-running, interactive functions in Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) platforms, where existing techniques to address enclave overheads are insufficient. We find FaaS functions can spend more time managing the enclave than executing application instructions. In this work, we propose a TEE/GC hybrid (TGh) protocol to enable confidential FaaS platforms. TGh moves computation out of the enclave onto the untrusted host using garbled circuits (GC), a cryptographic construction for secure function evaluation. Our approach retains the security guarantees of enclaves while avoiding the performance issues associated with enclave management instructions

Lower Bounds for Oblivious Data Structures

An oblivious data structure is a data structure where the memory access patterns reveals no information about the operations performed on it. Such data structures were introduced by Wang et al. [ACM SIGSAC'14] and are intended for situations where one wishes to store the data structure at an untrusted server. One way to obtain an oblivious data structure is simply to run a classic data structure on an oblivious RAM (ORAM). Until very recently, this resulted in an overhead of $\omega(\lg n)$ for the most natural setting of parameters. Moreover, a recent lower bound for ORAMs by Larsen and Nielsen [CRYPTO'18] show that they always incur an overhead of at least $\Omega(\lg n)$ if used in a black box manner. To circumvent the $\omega(\lg n)$ overhead, researchers have instead studied classic data structure problems more directly and have obtained efficient solutions for many such problems such as stacks, queues, deques, priority queues and search trees. However, none of these data structures process operations faster than $\Theta(\lg n)$, leaving open the question of whether even faster solutions exist. In this paper, we rule out this possibility by proving $\Omega(\lg n)$ lower bounds for oblivious stacks, queues, deques, priority queues and search trees.Comment: To appear at SODA'1

TGh: A TEE/GC Hybrid Enabling Confidential FaaS Platforms

Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) suffer from performance issues when executing certain management instructions, such as creating an enclave, context switching in and out of protected mode, and swapping cached pages. This is especially problematic for short-running, interactive functions in Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) platforms, where existing techniques to address enclave overheads are insufficient. We find FaaS functions can spend more time managing the enclave than executing application instructions. In this work, we propose a TEE/GC hybrid (TGh) protocol to enable confidential FaaS platforms. TGh moves computation out of the enclave onto the untrusted host using garbled circuits (GC), a cryptographic construction for secure function evaluation. Our approach retains the security guarantees of enclaves while avoiding the performance issues associated with enclave management instructions

Lower Bounds for Multi-Server Oblivious RAMs

In this work, we consider the construction of oblivious RAMs (ORAM) in a setting with multiple servers and the adversary may corrupt a subset of the servers. We present an $\Omega(\log n)$ overhead lower bound for any $k$-server ORAM that limits any PPT adversary to distinguishing advantage at most $1/4k$ when only one server is corrupted. In other words, if one insists on negligible distinguishing advantage, then multi-server ORAMs cannot be faster than single-server ORAMs even with polynomially many servers of which only one unknown server is corrupted. Our results apply to ORAMs that may err with probability at most $1/128$ as well as scenarios where the adversary corrupts larger subsets of servers. We also extend our lower bounds to other important data structures including oblivious stacks, queues, deques, priority queues and search trees

MPC for MPC: Secure Computation on a Massively Parallel Computing Architecture

Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) is a model of computation widely believed to best capture realistic parallel computing architectures such as large-scale MapReduce and Hadoop clusters. Motivated by the fact that many data analytics tasks performed on these platforms involve sensitive user data, we initiate the theoretical exploration of how to leverage MPC architectures to enable efficient, privacy-preserving computation over massive data. Clearly if a computation task does not lend itself to an efficient implementation on MPC even without security, then we cannot hope to compute it efficiently on MPC with security. We show, on the other hand, that any task that can be efficiently computed on MPC can also be securely computed with comparable efficiency. Specifically, we show the following results: - any MPC algorithm can be compiled to a communication-oblivious counterpart while asymptotically preserving its round and space complexity, where communication-obliviousness ensures that any network intermediary observing the communication patterns learn no information about the secret inputs; - assuming the existence of Fully Homomorphic Encryption with a suitable notion of compactness and other standard cryptographic assumptions, any MPC algorithm can be compiled to a secure counterpart that defends against an adversary who controls not only intermediate network routers but additionally up to 1/3 - ? fraction of machines (for an arbitrarily small constant ?) - moreover, this compilation preserves the round complexity tightly, and preserves the space complexity upto a multiplicative security parameter related blowup. As an initial exploration of this important direction, our work suggests new definitions and proposes novel protocols that blend algorithmic and cryptographic techniques

Yes, There is an Oblivious RAM Lower Bound!

An Oblivious RAM (ORAM) introduced by Goldreich and Ostrovsky [JACM\u2796] is a (possibly randomized) RAM, for which the memory access pattern reveals no information about the operations performed. The main performance metric of an ORAM is the bandwidth overhead, i.e., the multiplicative factor extra memory blocks that must be accessed to hide the operation sequence. In their seminal paper introducing the ORAM, Goldreich and Ostrovsky proved an amortized $\Omega(\lg n)$ bandwidth overhead lower bound for ORAMs with memory size $n$. Their lower bound is very strong in the sense that it applies to the ``offline\u27\u27 setting in which the ORAM knows the entire sequence of operations ahead of time. However, as pointed out by Boyle and Naor [ITCS\u2716] in the paper ``Is there an oblivious RAM lower bound?\u27\u27, there are two caveats with the lower bound of Goldreich and Ostrovsky: (1) it only applies to ``balls in bins\u27\u27 algorithms, i.e., algorithms where the ORAM may only shuffle blocks around and not apply any sophisticated encoding of the data, and (2), it only applies to statistically secure constructions. Boyle and Naor showed that removing the ``balls in bins\u27\u27 assumption would result in super linear lower bounds for sorting circuits, a long standing open problem in circuit complexity. As a way to circumventing this barrier, they also proposed a notion of an ``online\u27\u27 ORAM, which is an ORAM that remains secure even if the operations arrive in an online manner. They argued that most known ORAM constructions work in the online setting as well. Our contribution is an $\Omega(\lg n)$ lower bound on the bandwidth overhead of any online ORAM, even if we require only computational security and allow arbitrary representations of data, thus greatly strengthening the lower bound of Goldreich and Ostrovsky in the online setting. Our lower bound applies to ORAMs with memory size $n$ and any word size $r \geq 1$. The bound therefore asymptotically matches the known upper bounds when $r = \Omega(\lg^2 n)$

Raziel: Private and Verifiable Smart Contracts on Blockchains

Raziel combines secure multi-party computation and proof-carrying code to provide privacy, correctness and verifiability guarantees for smart contracts on blockchains. Effectively solving DAO and Gyges attacks, this paper describes an implementation and presents examples to demonstrate its practical viability (e.g., private and verifiable crowdfundings and investment funds). Additionally, we show how to use Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Proofs (i.e., Proof-Carrying Code certificates) to prove the validity of smart contracts to third parties before their execution without revealing anything else. Finally, we show how miners could get rewarded for generating pre-processing data for secure multi-party computation.Comment: Support: cothority/ByzCoin/OmniLedge

Senate: A Maliciously-Secure MPC Platform for Collaborative Analytics

Many organizations stand to benefit from pooling their data together in order to draw mutually beneficial insights -- e.g., for fraud detection across banks, better medical studies across hospitals, etc. However, such organizations are often prevented from sharing their data with each other by privacy concerns, regulatory hurdles, or business competition. We present Senate, a system that allows multiple parties to collaboratively run analytical SQL queries without revealing their individual data to each other. Unlike prior works on secure multi-party computation (MPC) that assume that all parties are semi-honest, Senate protects the data even in the presence of malicious adversaries. At the heart of Senate lies a new MPC decomposition protocol that decomposes the cryptographic MPC computation into smaller units, some of which can be executed by subsets of parties and in parallel, while preserving its security guarantees. Senate then provides a new query planning algorithm that decomposes and plans the cryptographic computation effectively, achieving a performance of up to 145$\times$ faster than the state-of-the-art

Memory Checking for Parallel RAMs

When outsourcing a database to an untrusted remote server, one might want to verify the integrity of contents while accessing it. To solve this, Blum et al. [FOCS `91] propose the notion of memory checking. Memory checking allows a user to run a RAM program on a remote server, with the ability to verify integrity of the storage with small local storage. In this work, we define and initiate the formal study of memory checking for Parallel RAMs (PRAMs). The parallel RAM model is very expressive and captures many modern architectures such as multi-core architectures and cloud clusters. When multiple clients run a PRAM algorithm on a shared remote server, it is possible that there are concurrency issues that cause inconsistencies. Therefore, integrity verification is even more desirable property in this setting. Assuming only the existence of one-way functions, we construct an online memory checker (one that reports faults as soon as they occur) for PRAMs with $O(\log N)$ simulation overhead in both work and depth. In addition, we construct an offline memory checker (one that reports faults only after a long sequence of operations) with amortized $O(1)$ simulation overhead in both work and depth. Our constructions match the best known simulation overhead of the memory checkers in the standard single-user RAM setting. As an application of our parallel memory checking constructions, we additionally construct the first maliciously secure oblivious parallel RAM (OPRAM) with polylogarithmic overhead