Bibliometric-enhanced Retrieval Models for Big Scholarly Information Systems

Bibliometric techniques are not yet widely used to enhance retrieval processes in digital libraries, although they offer value-added effects for users. In this paper we will explore how statistical modelling of scholarship, such as Bradfordizing or network analysis of coauthorship network, can improve retrieval services for specific communities, as well as for large, cross-domain large collections. This paper aims to raise awareness of the missing link between information retrieval (IR) and bibliometrics / scientometrics and to create a common ground for the incorporation of bibliometric-enhanced services into retrieval at the digital library interface.Comment: 4 pages, IEEE BigData 2013, Workshop on Scholarly Big Data: Challenges and Idea

The Symbiotic Relationship Between Information Retrieval and Informetrics

Informetrics and information retrieval (IR) represent fundamental areas of study within information science. Historically, researchers have not fully capitalized on the potential research synergies that exist between these two areas. Data sources used in traditional informetrics studies have their analogues in IR, with similar types of empirical regularities found in IR system content and use. Methods for data collection and analysis used in informetrics can help to inform IR system development and evaluation. Areas of application have included automatic indexing, index term weighting and understanding user query and session patterns through the quantitative analysis of user transaction logs. Similarly, developments in database technology have made the study of informetric phenomena less cumbersome, and recent innovations used in IR research, such as language models and ranking algorithms, provide new tools that may be applied to research problems of interest to informetricians. Building on the author’s previous work (Wolfram 2003), this paper reviews a sample of relevant literature published primarily since 2000 to highlight how each area of study may help to inform and benefit the other

The Role of Document Structure and Citation Analysis in Literature Information Retrieval

Literature Information Retrieval (IR) is the task of searching relevant publications given a particular information need expressed as a set of queries. With the staggering growth of scientific literature, it is critical to design effective retrieval solutions to facilitate efficient access to them. We hypothesize that particular genre specific characteristics of scientific literature such as metadata and citations are potentially helpful for enhancing scientific literature search. We conducted systematic and extensive IR experiments on open information retrieval test collections to investigate their roles in enhancing literature information retrieval effectiveness. This thesis consists of three major parts of studies. First, we examined the role of document structure in literature search through comprehensive studies on the retrieval effectiveness of a set of structure-aware retrieval models on ad hoc scientific literature search tasks. Second, under the language modeling retrieval framework, we studied exploiting citation and co-citation analysis results as sources of evidence for enhancing literature search. Specifically, we examined relevant document distribution patterns over partitioned clusters of document citation and co-citation graphs; we examined seven ways of modeling document prior probabilities of being relevant based on document citation and co-citation analysis; we studied the effectiveness of boosting retrieved documents with scores of their neighborhood documents in terms co-citation counts, co-citation similarities and Howard White's pennant scores. Third, we combined both structured retrieval features and citation related features in developing machine learned retrieval models for literatures search and assessed the effectiveness of learning to rank algorithms and various literature-specific features. Our major findings are as follows. State-of-the-art structure-ware retrieval models though reportedly perform well in known item finding tasks do not significantly outperform non-fielded baseline retrieval models in ad hoc literature information retrieval. Though relevant document distributions over citation and co-citation network graph partitions reveal favorable pattern, citation and co-citation analysis results on the current iSearch test collection only modestly improve retrieval effectiveness. However, priors derived from co-citation analysis outperform that derived from citation analysis, and pennant score for document expansion outperforms raw co-citation count or cosine similarity of co-citation counts. Our learning to rank experiments show that in a heterogeneous collection setting, citation related features can significantly outperform baselines.Ph.D., Information Studies -- Drexel University, 201