A tight lower bound for an online hypercube packing problem and bounds for prices of anarchy of a related game

We prove a tight lower bound on the asymptotic performance ratio $\rho$ of the bounded space online $d$-hypercube bin packing problem, solving an open question raised in 2005. In the classic $d$-hypercube bin packing problem, we are given a sequence of $d$-dimensional hypercubes and we have an unlimited number of bins, each of which is a $d$-dimensional unit hypercube. The goal is to pack (orthogonally) the given hypercubes into the minimum possible number of bins, in such a way that no two hypercubes in the same bin overlap. The bounded space online $d$-hypercube bin packing problem is a variant of the $d$-hypercube bin packing problem, in which the hypercubes arrive online and each one must be packed in an open bin without the knowledge of the next hypercubes. Moreover, at each moment, only a constant number of open bins are allowed (whenever a new bin is used, it is considered open, and it remains so until it is considered closed, in which case, it is not allowed to accept new hypercubes). Epstein and van Stee [SIAM J. Comput. 35 (2005), no. 2, 431-448] showed that $\rho$ is $\Omega(\log d)$ and $O(d/\log d)$, and conjectured that it is $\Theta(\log d)$. We show that $\rho$ is in fact $\Theta(d/\log d)$. To obtain this result, we elaborate on some ideas presented by those authors, and go one step further showing how to obtain better (offline) packings of certain special instances for which one knows how many bins any bounded space algorithm has to use. Our main contribution establishes the existence of such packings, for large enough $d$, using probabilistic arguments. Such packings also lead to lower bounds for the prices of anarchy of the selfish $d$-hypercube bin packing game. We present a lower bound of $\Omega(d/\log d)$ for the pure price of anarchy of this game, and we also give a lower bound of $\Omega(\log d)$ for its strong price of anarchy

Lower bound for 3-batched bin packing

Abstract In this paper we will consider a special relaxation of the well-known online bin packing problem. In a batched bin packing problem (BBPP)–defined by Gutin et al. (2005)–the elements come in batches and one batch is available for packing in a given time. If we have K ≥ 2 batches then we denote the problem by K -BBPP. In Gutin et al. (2005) the authors gave a 1.3871 … lower bound for the asymptotic competitive ratio (ACR) of any on-line 2 -BBBP algorithm. In this paper we investigate the 3-BBPP, and we give 1.51211 … lower bound for its ACR

Tight bounds for NF-based bounded-space online bin packing algorithms

In Zheng et al. (J Comb Optim 30(2):360–369, 2015) modelled a surgery problem by the one-dimensional bin packing, and developed a semi-online algorithm to give an efficient feasible solution. In their algorithm they used a buffer to temporarily store items, having a possibility to lookahead in the list. Because of the considered practical problem they investigated the 2-parametric case, when the size of the items is at most 1/2. Using an NF-based online algorithm the authors proved an ACR of 13/9 = 1.44 … for any given buffer size not less than 1. They also gave a lower bound of 4/3 = 1.33 … for the bounded-space algorithms that use NF-based rules. Later, in Zhang et al. (J Comb Optim 33(2):530–542, 2017) an algorithm was given with an ACR of 1.4243, and the authors improved the lower bound to 1.4230. In this paper we present a tight lower bound of h∞ (r) for the r-parametric problem when the buffer capacity is 3. Since h∞ (2) = 1.42312 …, our result—as a special case—gives a tight bound for the algorithm-class given in 2017. To prove that the lower bound is tight, we present an NF-based online algorithm that considers the r-parametric problem, and uses a buffer with capacity of 3. We prove that this algorithm has an ACR that is equal to the lower bounds for arbitrary r. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Online Two-Dimensional Vector Packing with Advice

We consider the online two-dimensional vector packing problem, showing a lower bound of $11/5$ on the competitive ratio of any {\sc AnyFit} strategy for the problem. We provide strategies with competitive ratio $\max\!\left\{2,6\big/\big(1+3\tan(\pi/4-\gamma/2)\big)+\epsilon\right\}$ and logarithmic advice, for any instance where all the input vectors are restricted to have angles in the range $[\pi/4-\gamma/2,\pi/4+\gamma/2]$, for $0\leq\gamma<\pi/3$ and $\max\left\{5/2,4\big/\big(1+2\tan(\pi/4-\gamma/2)\big)+\epsilon\right\}$ and logarithmic advice, for any instance where all the input vectors are restricted to have angles in the range $[\pi/4-\gamma/2,\pi/4+\gamma/2]$, for $0\leq\gamma\leq\pi/3$. In addition, we give a $5/2$-competitive strategy also using logarithmic advice for the unrestricted vectors case. These results should be contrasted to the currently best competitive strategy, FirstFit, having competitive ratio~$27/10$.Comment: 15 pages, 4 figures. This an extended version of an article published in "Algorithms and Complexity. CIAC 2021." Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12701. Springer, https://doi.org/10.100