651 research outputs found

    A Penalized-Likelihood Image Reconstruction Method for Emission Tomography, Compared to Postsmoothed Maximum-Likelihood With Matched Spatial Resolution

    Full text link
    Regularization is desirable for image reconstruction in emission tomography. A powerful regularization method is the penalized-likelihood (PL) reconstruction algorithm (or equivalently, maximum a posteriori reconstruction), where the sum of the likelihood and a noise suppressing penalty term (or Bayesian prior) is optimized. Usually, this approach yields position-dependent resolution and bias. However, for some applications in emission tomography, a shift-invariant point spread function would be advantageous. Recently, a new method has been proposed, in which the penalty term is tuned in every pixel to impose a uniform local impulse response. In this paper, an alternative way to tune the penalty term is presented. We performed positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography simulations to compare the performance of the new method to that of the postsmoothed maximum-likelihood (ML) approach, using the impulse response of the former method as the postsmoothing filter for the latter. For this experiment, the noise properties of the PL algorithm were not superior to those of postsmoothed ML reconstruction.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/85948/1/Fessler65.pd

    Development and implementation of efficient noise suppression methods for emission computed tomography

    Get PDF
    In PET and SPECT imaging, iterative reconstruction is now widely used due to its capability of incorporating into the reconstruction process a physics model and Bayesian statistics involved in photon detection. Iterative reconstruction methods rely on regularization terms to suppress image noise and render radiotracer distribution with good image quality. The choice of regularization method substantially affects the appearances of reconstructed images, and is thus a critical aspect of the reconstruction process. Major contributions of this work include implementation and evaluation of various new regularization methods. Previously, our group developed a preconditioned alternating projection algorithm (PAPA) to optimize the emission computed tomography (ECT) objective function with the non-differentiable total variation (TV) regularizer. The algorithm was modified to optimize the proposed reconstruction objective functions. First, two novel TV-based regularizersโ€”high-order total variation (HOTV) and infimal convolution total variation (ICTV)โ€”were proposed as alternative choices to the customary TV regularizer in SPECT reconstruction, to reduce โ€œstaircaseโ€ artifacts produced by TV. We have evaluated both proposed reconstruction methods (HOTV-PAPA and ICTV-PAPA), and compared them with the TV regularized reconstruction (TV-PAPA) and the clinical standard, Gaussian post-filtered, expectation-maximization reconstruction method (GPF-EM) using both Monte Carlo-simulated data and anonymized clinical data. Model-observer studies using Monte Carlo-simulated data indicate that ICTV-PAPA is able to reconstruct images with similar or better lesion detectability, compared with clinical standard GPF-EM methods, but at lower detected count levels. This implies that switching from GPF-EM to ICTV-PAPA can reduce patient dose while maintaining image quality for diagnostic use. Second, the 1 norm of discrete cosine transform (DCT)-induced framelet regularization was studied. We decomposed the image into high and low spatial-frequency components, and then preferentially penalized the high spatial-frequency components. The DCT-induced framelet transform of the natural radiotracer distribution image is sparse. By using this property, we were able to effectively suppress image noise without overly compromising spatial resolution or image contrast. Finally, the fractional norm of the first-order spatial gradient was introduced as a regularizer. We implemented 2/3 and 1/2 norms to suppress image spatial variability. Due to the strong penalty of small differences between neighboring pixels, fractional-norm regularizers suffer from similar cartoon-like artifacts as with the TV regularizer. However, when penalty weights are properly selected, fractional-norm regularizers outperform TV in terms of noise suppression and contrast recovery

    ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์  ์œ ๋„ PET ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ: ๋งค๋„๋Ÿฝ์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ์ ‘๊ทผ๊นŒ์ง€

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2021. 2. ์ด์žฌ์„ฑ.Advances in simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) technology have led to an active investigation of the anatomy-guided regularized PET image reconstruction algorithm based on MR images. Among the various priors proposed for anatomy-guided regularized PET image reconstruction, Bowsherโ€™s method based on second-order smoothing priors sometimes suffers from over-smoothing of detailed structures. Therefore, in this study, we propose a Bowsher prior based on the l1 norm and an iteratively reweighting scheme to overcome the limitation of the original Bowsher method. In addition, we have derived a closed solution for iterative image reconstruction based on this non-smooth prior. A comparison study between the original l2 and proposed l1 Bowsher priors were conducted using computer simulation and real human data. In the simulation and real data application, small lesions with abnormal PET uptake were better detected by the proposed l1 Bowsher prior methods than the original Bowsher prior. The original l2 Bowsher leads to a decreased PET intensity in small lesions when there is no clear separation between the lesions and surrounding tissue in the anatomical prior. However, the proposed l1 Bowsher prior methods showed better contrast between the tumors and surrounding tissues owing to the intrinsic edge-preserving property of the prior which is attributed to the sparseness induced by l1 norm, especially in the iterative reweighting scheme. Besides, the proposed methods demonstrated lower bias and less hyper-parameter dependency on PET intensity estimation in the regions with matched anatomical boundaries in PET and MRI. Moreover, based on the formulation of l1 Bowsher prior, the unrolled network containing the conventional maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization (ML-EM) module was also proposed. The convolutional layers successfully learned the distribution of anatomically-guided PET images and the EM module corrected the intermediate outputs by comparing them with sinograms. The proposed unrolled network showed better performance than ordinary U-Net, where the regional uptake is less biased and deviated. Therefore, these methods will help improve the PET image quality based on the anatomical side information.์–‘์ „์ž๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋‹จ์ธต์ดฌ์˜ / ์ž๊ธฐ๊ณต๋ช…์˜์ƒ (PET/MRI) ๋™์‹œ ํš๋“ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์œผ๋กœ MR ์˜์ƒ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์  ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ •๊ทœํ™” ๋œ PET ์˜์ƒ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ฌ๋„์žˆ๋Š” ํ‰๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ •๊ทœํ™” ๋œ PET ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ „ ์ค‘ 2์ฐจ ํ‰ํ™œํ™” ์‚ฌ์ „ํ•จ์ˆ˜์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ Bowsher์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋•Œ๋•Œ๋กœ ์„ธ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ํ‰ํ™œํ™”๋กœ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์„ ๊ฒช๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์›๋ž˜ Bowsher ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด l1 norm์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ Bowsher ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ•จ์ˆ˜์™€ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์ ์ธ ์žฌ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ด ๋งค๋„๋Ÿฝ์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์  ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‹ซํžŒ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์›๋ž˜ l2์™€ ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ l1 Bowsher ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋น„๊ต ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์—์„œ ๋น„์ •์ƒ์ ์ธ PET ํก์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ž‘์€ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์€ ์›๋ž˜ Bowsher ์ด์ „๋ณด๋‹ค ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ l1 Bowsher ์‚ฌ์ „ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋” ์ž˜ ๊ฐ์ง€๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์›๋ž˜์˜ l2 Bowsher๋Š” ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์  ์˜์ƒ์—์„œ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€๊ณผ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์กฐ์ง ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์—†์„ ๋•Œ ์ž‘์€ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์—์„œ์˜ PET ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ l1 Bowsher ์‚ฌ์ „ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ํŠนํžˆ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์  ์žฌ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์—์„œ l1 ๋…ธ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์œ ๋„๋œ ํฌ์†Œ์„ฑ์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ข…์–‘๊ณผ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์กฐ์ง ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ๋Œ€๋น„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ PET๊ณผ MRI์˜ ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์  ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ PET ๊ฐ•๋„ ์ถ”์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํŽธํ–ฅ์ด ๋” ๋‚ฎ๊ณ  ํ•˜์ดํผ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์ข…์†์„ฑ์ด ์ ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, l1Bowsher ์‚ฌ์ „ ํ•จ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋‹ซํžŒ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ML-EM (maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization) ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ํŽผ์ณ์ง„ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋„ ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ปจ๋ณผ๋ฃจ์…˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์–ด๋Š” ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ๋„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ PET ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•™์Šตํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, EM ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์€ ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ์ถœ๋ ฅ๋“ค์„ ์‚ฌ์ด๋…ธ๊ทธ๋žจ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์ž˜ ๋“ค์–ด๋งž๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ํŽผ์ณ์ง„ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋Š” ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ํก์ˆ˜์„ ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋œ ํŽธํ–ฅ๋˜๊ณ  ํŽธ์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์ ์–ด, ์ผ๋ฐ˜ U-Net๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์€ ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์  ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ PET ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Backgrounds 1 1.1.1. Positron Emission Tomography 1 1.1.2. Maximum a Posterior Reconstruction 1 1.1.3. Anatomical Prior 2 1.1.4. Proposed l_1 Bowsher Prior 3 1.1.5. Deep Learning for MR-less Application 4 1.2. Purpose of the Research 4 Chapter 2. Anatomically-guided PET Reconstruction Using Bowsher Prior 6 2.1. Backgrounds 6 2.1.1. PET Data Model 6 2.1.2. Original Bowsher Prior 7 2.2. Methods and Materials 8 2.2.1. Proposed l_1 Bowsher Prior 8 2.2.2. Iterative Reweighting 13 2.2.3. Computer Simulations 15 2.2.4. Human Data 16 2.2.5. Image Analysis 17 2.3. Results 19 2.3.1. Simulation with Brain Phantom 19 2.3.2.Human Data 20 2.4. Discussions 25 Chapter 3. Deep Learning Approach for Anatomically-guided PET Reconstruction 31 3.1. Backgrounds 31 3.2. Methods and Materials 33 3.2.1. Douglas-Rachford Splitting 33 3.2.2. Network Architecture 34 3.2.3. Dataset and Training Details 35 3.2.4. Image Analysis 36 3.3. Results 37 3.4. Discussions 38 Chapter 4. Conclusions 40 Bibliography 41 Abstract in Korean (๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก) 52Docto

    TomograPy: A Fast, Instrument-Independent, Solar Tomography Software

    Full text link
    Solar tomography has progressed rapidly in recent years thanks to the development of robust algorithms and the availability of more powerful computers. It can today provide crucial insights in solving issues related to the line-of-sight integration present in the data of solar imagers and coronagraphs. However, there remain challenges such as the increase of the available volume of data, the handling of the temporal evolution of the observed structures, and the heterogeneity of the data in multi-spacecraft studies. We present a generic software package that can perform fast tomographic inversions that scales linearly with the number of measurements, linearly with the length of the reconstruction cube (and not the number of voxels) and linearly with the number of cores and can use data from different sources and with a variety of physical models: TomograPy (http://nbarbey.github.com/TomograPy/), an open-source software freely available on the Python Package Index. For performance, TomograPy uses a parallelized-projection algorithm. It relies on the World Coordinate System standard to manage various data sources. A variety of inversion algorithms are provided to perform the tomographic-map estimation. A test suite is provided along with the code to ensure software quality. Since it makes use of the Siddon algorithm it is restricted to rectangular parallelepiped voxels but the spherical geometry of the corona can be handled through proper use of priors. We describe the main features of the code and show three practical examples of multi-spacecraft tomographic inversions using STEREO/EUVI and STEREO/COR1 data. Static and smoothly varying temporal evolution models are presented.Comment: 21 pages, 6 figures, 5 table
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore